In post 101, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I'm going to spend time going over page 2 posts to explain why I thought you were taking it more seriously than he was. I found you too serious, I voted you, I have now moved on. Why don't you do the same?
Because assessing motivation is one of the clearest ways I know of to find scum. If you actually thought I was taking it more seriously, you wouldn't have to look up page 2 posts; you could just tell us what you were thinking at the time.
Also, I've seen games go out of RVS in page 1 if someone made a serious scumslip. I don't think we were in RVS at the point you made your comment. I want to know why you thought we were still in RVS.
I'm still null on Garmr. Not no-information null, but conflicting information null. I don't like his joke posts, but I also think they drew a lot of attention to him in the early part of the game. I'm not sure that's something scum would do. That said, I don't buy the "gambit" comment. Trying to act very very scummy isn't usually a productive way to catch scum in my opinion -- it's more likely to catch town who spot what they believe to be scumtells and vote accordingly. So still null on Garmr.
I'm still thinking about 2birds1stone. The "I am trying to look awesomely townie" thing is the exact opposite of Garmr's "I'm trying to look horribly scummy" and both seem odd from a town perspective.
Gun to my head, I'd probably vote 2birds1stone of the two mentioned. That said, they aren't the only two choices out there.
What do you think of Prohawk, Victor?
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
