In post 38, northsidegal wrote:haha, this is such a weird scenario because SS doesn't have the title thread ego'd.
arguably this is game-breaking, arguably this is exactly the sort of shenanigans that i was inviting with this game. either way, i'm still loving watching this game so far, and i hope it's just as interesting for the players.
oh yeah i love that
they edited the post
Oh, that's dirty. Especially if Kitsune was in fact Isis like I initially thought.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
Enter wrote:Komainu reads tonally like a firebringer that is actually trying to play the game, a read which is likely heavily biased by the fact that their avatars are similar.
This is funny because in the early game I was kinda imitating Firebringer, the choice of which was certainly biased by the fact that the avatars are similar
He was sort of my model for the type of play I was going for, though I did shift it to be more analytical and introspective as the game went on.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
at least when it comes to the avatar, i don't think i can disagree.
your name was originally supposed to be kuda-gitsune, but i wasn't allowed to make that a username. i suppose it's because it has a dash? which i guess i thought i could include
I feel bad about editing my post in the title thread overcorrecting like that. I tried to make the least substantive comment I could rather than feign some particular person when I edited the post once I determined that the title thread lets you edit but not delete post (for reasons I surely don't understand, you can't delete posts even if they're the most recent)
You should have just blanked it out. That would have been perfectly reasonable I think and not imply anything, since it's obvious you blanked it because you weren't supposed to post there on that account.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
Kim was lots of fun and Hectic is a lot of fun. That makes sense.
It makes lots of sense for Kirk to be Dunnstral, I figured if he made a chart in a game he'd use ascii stuff instead of paint, but I guess that was an errant assumption without reasoning for it.
Man I'm pretty sure I would have won if you didn't edit your post to one that directly contradicted something you had just posted :/
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
In post 1018, Something_Smart wrote:You should have just blanked it out. That would have been perfectly reasonable I think and not imply anything, since it's obvious you blanked it because you weren't supposed to post there on that account.
I didn't think of this, for some reason. Cognitively maybe because I know a post with no text isn't allowed by the forums, but I should have just done a period.