Open 456: Faith Plus One [Game Over]

ISO · Post Post #1200 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:18 pm

Welp

Looking for a replacement for Antihero

Majiffy · Post Post #1201 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:24 pm

Rufcking lawfl.

ISO · Post Post #1202 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:16 am

chkflip replaces Antihero!

ISO · Post Post #1203 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:18 am

Votecount 5.2

[1] chkflip (Zar)
[1] shos (RachMarie)

[3] Not Voting (chkflip, Majiffy, shos)

With 5 alive, it is 3 to lynch.

Let me know if you see any problems.

Deadline is in: (expired on 2012-12-30 09:00:00)

shos · Post Post #1204 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:21 am

I get a computer tomorrow so yay. I promise content

Majiffy · Post Post #1205 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:30 am

Good.

shos · Post Post #1206 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:33 pm

In case you didn't get the message majiffy, I joined the army 13 days ago, and that's why I became inactive. I I'm on my way home now do ill read your case in around two hours

Majiffy · Post Post #1207 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:51 pm

Well that's just adorable.

chkflip · Post Post #1208 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:58 pm

I helped get this game into fruition. It's Darth Yoshi's baby. I love it. Give me a two days to read up, that's a lot of pages.

shos · Post Post #1209 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:00 pm

I know right ^_^

chkflip · Post Post #1210 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:56 pm

1176/1178 rub me the wrong way. "Hey, it's LYLO you guys... so I'm going to throw a vote out there after fully announcing that scum could quick-hammer at any time."

1195 is excuses on top of excuses. Why couldn't this be said instead of "lolsheepsauce" in 1178? Because it's bullshit, that's why.

On this alone I'm comfortable lynching RachMarie, but I'll go back to reading the game for more reads/connections.

I'd appreciate it if everyone unvoted, however, unless you are certain without a doubt that your vote is on scum. I'd like to know why.

shos, we're all waiting for that post you were going to get to. So do please get to it. Thanks.

shos · Post Post #1211 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:37 am

Yeah please give me some time here yo. I caught up with one game so far and have 2 more games to catch up with and stuff. I got back from the army like 5 hours ago and only organized and told stories and ate and did some checkups irl till now so I'm slowly getting to it. I'm terribly tired, but I'll do it today, hold your breaths. just gimme an hour or so, probably even less.

shos · Post Post #1212 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:12 am

Yo I caught up with that other game. I'm dead tired. seriously. Ima wake up in some few hours and get here.

shos · Post Post #1213 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:31 am

Holy shit man I just read your case and I have absolutely no case to defend against

that's just a bunch of links and calling names. this is what I tend to call usually 'forced case 101' - go over a person's entire ISO and point out 'bad' things in it. so that's practically what you did - whenever I said something good about CE you say I'm defending buddy, whenever I vote him I'm bussing, whenever I'm voting someone else it's a wagonhop, etc. your case - is not a case - but merely a fake scumhunting attempt, and a really bad one. get out of that tunnel if you're town man. read up antihero's slot. think a little. you're a good player mostly, so it seems like you just got lazy here, picked a person and ISOed him and tunnel him to the end of the world(which passed 10 minutes ago - 21:22 21/12/2012)...

~~~

I'm not going to vote yet because this chkflip needs to catch up and comment and stuff, but I have to say that I think it seriously sucks that he replaced in just now, because now he cannot defend against any antihero case I may build. so it's going to be kinda hard on me to try and rethink my vote; the best option possible for him is to actually make a better, more in depth and convincing case on someone else (probably rach or maj) and make me vote THEM.

at the moment, I'm like 90% sure antihero slot was scum; so the real big question is if it is rach or maj. I'll go with something like 75% that it is Majiffy, but I really need to reread rach for this kind of analysis.

Majiffy · Post Post #1214 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:58 am

In post 1213, shos wrote:Holy shit man I just read your case and I have absolutely no case to defend against

In post 1213, shos wrote:this is what I tend to call usually 'forced case 101' - go over a person's entire ISO and point out 'bad' things in it.

It's funny, you posted this as a direct response to me and yet so much of this looks like an appeal to other people.

In post 1213, shos wrote:whenever I said something good about CE you say I'm defending buddy, whenever I vote him I'm bussing, whenever I'm voting someone else it's a wagonhop, etc.

And all of these are completely valid claims. I'm sorry you're having difficulty rectifying that you've shown your hand.

In post 1213, shos wrote:your case - is not a case - but merely a fake scumhunting attempt, and a really bad one. get out of that tunnel if you're town man. read up antihero's slot. think a little.

So I'm fake scumhunting, which implies I'm scum - because why would town fake scumhunting - and yet you appeal to me to lynch Antihero. Mmhmm. Again; are you talking to me, or are you just trying to discredit my case on you with a load of rhetoric?

In post 1213, shos wrote:you're a good player mostly, so it seems like you just got lazy here, picked a person and ISOed him and tunnel him to the end of the world

Cute attempt to sway me with ego. Not going to work.

Also, please go ahead and click that meta link in my signature and point out

one time

I randomly picked a person and then just built a case and tunneled them all game. Scum or town, I don't care.

Shos scum for days.

shos · Post Post #1215 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:07 pm

1. Appeal to other people..? Is that bad?

2. Do you realize that it's catch 22?
You've condemned me regardless of what I do.

3.yes I am trying to discredit yourcayour car our case obviously.

4.im sorry, but perhaps I mixed it_ have I I said anything about meta?

Majiffy · Post Post #1216 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:42 pm

In post 1215, shos wrote:1. Appeal to other people..? Is that bad?

The way in which you're doing it - indirectly, through a dismissive "argument" with me - yes.

In post 1215, shos wrote:2. Do you realize that it's catch 22?
You've condemned me regardless of what I do.

Funny thing about being scum, that.

In post 1215, shos wrote:3.yes I am trying to discredit yourcayour car our case obviously.

Refute and discredit are two very different things, mind you. But thanks for admitting to anti-town behavior.

In post 1215, shos wrote:4.im sorry, but perhaps I mixed it_ have I I said anything about meta?

I'm just saying that it makes no sense to assume I'm doing something that makes no sense for me to ever do, ever.

Zar · Post Post #1217 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:13 pm

blatant prod dodge. Will read tomorrow evening.

ISO · Post Post #1218 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:21 pm

If anyone is V/LA over the weekend, now might be a good time to say so.

chkflip · Post Post #1219 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:46 pm

RachMarie + shos/Zar, I think.

VOTE: RachMarie

shos · Post Post #1220 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:56 pm

In post 1216, Majiffy wrote:
In post 1215, shos wrote:1. Appeal to other people..? Is that bad?

The way in which you're doing it - indirectly, through a dismissive "argument" with me - yes.

In post 1215, shos wrote:2. Do you realize that it's catch 22?
You've condemned me regardless of what I do.

Funny thing about being scum, that.

In post 1215, shos wrote:3.yes I am trying to discredit yourcayour car our case obviously.

Refute and discredit are two very different things, mind you. But thanks for admitting to anti-town behavior.

In post 1215, shos wrote:4.im sorry, but perhaps I mixed it_ have I I said anything about meta?

I'm just saying that it makes no sense to assume I'm doing something that makes no sense for me to ever do, ever.

1 - I don't get it. if I said, "Yo zar!" before everything I wrote - aka, appeal to them directly - it makes it okay? what "argument" are you talking about? there is really no content discussion here; you just picked everything I did and called it bad names. I really don't get it.

2 - ????
you mean, "funny thing about being in a tunnel" maybe?

3. I discredit your case by saying that there is nothing for me to refute. at all. how is that anti-town behavior?

4. why does it make no sense? you replcaed into a 40+ pages game, so instead of reading it all, you picked a person and never said anything about anyone else at all. your response btw is in no way related to my question, lol.

In post 1219, chkflip wrote:RachMarie + shos/Zar, I think.

VOTE: RachMarie

any reasoning for that? why did you exclude Majiffy?

shos · Post Post #1221 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:57 pm

also just in case you didn't notice - we're in lylo, so you should really be sure when you place a vote >_>

chkflip · Post Post #1222 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:02 pm

Majiffy-slot reads null-leaning-town to me.

Why didn't you assure Zar or RachMarie that it was lylo?

shos · Post Post #1223 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:09 pm

because they have been in the game longer, so they probably already know it's lylo...you just replaced in...

chkflip · Post Post #1224 (ISO) » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:11 pm

Fair enough, just something that popped out as interesting to me.

I think, at this point, we should all come forward with full reads on everyone in the game. That should help us move forward.

I understand everyone has their reads and have clearly stated them but us going over them again should help with clarity.