In post 95, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:So, instead of leaving you and just killing you at night he decides to attack you because...
You're right, I had zero mentions of you. I was interested in a Runner wagon and his responses make me think he could be town and now I'm interested in doing something else. I fail to see where I seek support for voting you.
It's dumb because it relies on the doc staying alive.
Nah. I read your past games. You are confident in your play. You would engage and play aggressively.
re: plan - You clearly didn't do the math. If you're going to make comments like that, can you please do the math first? Thanks.
In post 96, Flubbernugget wrote:FG so you seem to have believed the cop claim but are now proposing a no lynch for extra investigations?
Did you read my 26 where I say Esp's probably just kidding?
Because you obviously didn't read it.
In post 97, Espeonage wrote:This is categorically incorrect.
Pressure votes on inactive slots have never been, and never will be a good motivator. Pressure votes are only effective for getting differing content out of an active slot that is difficult to read either way.
Pressure votes on scum reads are also inherently scummy bc you are aiming to prove your read right to the rest of the game.
Inactives? There are no inactives in this game. Everyone's clearly here to some degree, reading.
Voting them will make them come defend themselves at the very least.
If you disagree with what I'm saying, that's fine, but don't expect to change my opinions.