In post 1380, Amrun wrote:Personally, that wasn’t at all why I voted for you. I didn’t suspect eth0s at that point so obviously my reads were sucking then. Sorry!!
I think the next time I’m in a game where one player who eventually flips scum, does a really weird thing, like allegedly trying to randomly try to lynch a player for a “reaction test”, I’m going to be super suspicious of the player who was targeted.
I was even more shocked that Flicker slot who basically supported this inanity, wound up being the NK. Like did anyone seriously expect that slot to flip town after that?
Killing a50 was my greatest mistake. It was originally gonna be drew because I was getting PR vibes. Idek why I changed to a50, I guess paranoid over his potential.
In post 1384, eth0s wrote:Killing a50 was my greatest mistake. It was originally gonna be drew because I was getting PR vibes. Idek why I changed to a50, I guess paranoid over his potential.
In post 1385, Dannflor wrote:killing a replacement is always a fine move as scum if you're not immediately worried about anyone alive
No Dann, I agree with eth0s here. Flicker slot could have been a very easy mislynch. That slot had massive associations with Shos. But in general, if you have no better reason, sure.
@eth0s, Drew would have been a good NK, since as you now know, I was on Robb.
Like if someone had "Accidentally" hammered, would I be suspicious of them? Yes.
Would they be the one most at fault? Yes.
Would I feel there is a possibility that that you contributed to foul play? Yes.
Would that feeling be amplified in cases where the hammerer flips scum? Yes.
In post 1390, eth0s wrote:Like if someone had "Accidentally" hammered, would I be suspicious of them? Yes.
Would they be the one most at fault? Yes.
Would I feel there is a possibility that that you contributed to foul play? Yes.
Would that feeling be amplified in cases where the hammerer flips scum? Yes.
I could not vehemently disagree more with this. I am far far less suspicious of quickhammers on scum than town, because it really makes little sense for scum to do that
In post 1392, eth0s wrote:But why? Scum commonly quick hammer themselves to cut the day short and leave less discussion. Therefore partners have the same motivation.
Not likely, especially on D1 of a micro. Occams Razor says that unless you actually have meta on that player to assume that, Robb’s solve of always lynching offwagon first - unless you have an objectively scummy player - see Dunn in RJN - makes the most sense Ask RC.
However if you have good reason to tr everyone offwagon, then you need to look there but scum and town is far more likely to insta quickhammer town than either are scum. And more often than not - as YOUR play obviously proves here - scum usually makes it a point to hide inconspicuously on a any wagon and not go out of their way to put a target on their back. Scum!me wouldn’t be dumb enough to put a target on myself like that. I would have definitely waited for whatever claim and only bus with consensus. Why? Because I’m not an idiot.
