@Ank
This is pure bullshit and you already know it just from how you worded this section. You're correct in that I didn't say it as 'possible scum', 'potential scum', or even 'very likely scum.' You might also notice that I didn't put 'confirmed scum' or any other variant either.You're grasping at straws and the fact that you're trying to force the engagement shut directly after doing it is really slimy.
blah blah blah you are guilty as charged, I see.
I'm doing the very opposite. I'm directly confronting you, and asking you to talk about your motivation and reads. Well, specifically because I think they are fake, but getting you to talk is how others and I can resolve if you are more scummy/less scummy than other players. Consider my engagements with SB, Kilga, Sakura, and Pieguy from day 1. I'm always going somewhere. Now it's your turn.
When I posted my list of reads, you asked for one or two sentences for every scum read (which was half the game at that point). I'd like to see you do the same thing, please.
This is a false question. Thinking someone is town from interactions is completely different from agreeing with them. I think Malakittens is wrong (beyond what she was already wrong on), but I don't think the thought processes are scum-motivated. The only thing that's really weird about her play is how she got to the conclusion that there has to be a scum in our neighborhood, but it doesn't translate very strongly to scum behavior.
You listed Mala as 'probably town', despite many players scum reading her, based on these supposed interactions in your topic that nobody can read except Mala and Kilga. Town are very likely to have to lynch between you, Katsuki and Mala in day 4. Can you give us some reason for being able to rule out Mala or yourself as scum? I accept you can't copy from the topic, but can you post comment numbers, say why you think it's town, and then we can at least have Kilga agree/disagree if what you said make sense.
Otherwise we have no way to identify if you are just fabricating reads.
Yet you're the only person who I have an issue with a scumread of me on.
I can read people attacking me better than any other situation I end up in, and your attack pings harder every time you post about it.
I have an issue with bad votes. You consolidate voted 48 hours away from phase end, and did nothing to support/stop a Drezi lynch. It increasingly seems likely that Ooba is scum, so that means when you had a choice of three wagons, you consolidated on to the main lynch counterwagon to scum. And didn't re-evaluate. You were around and could have done something, and I contend that town would have. You didn't do anything, and I think that's the scum mindset.
"I can read people attacking etc" that is what we call confirmation bias, chum.
I'm asking you to explain your reads in greater detail because your preliminary explanations do not make intuitive sense.
GIF was attacking my scumread on Rylai because of the global track card he played on D1. I was listing off reasons that would make it less harmful for scum to have it as one of their powers. How exactly is this fake content or fluff?
Huh, so I'm not the 'only player' who has an issue ^_~
Although I will agree that I would like it if Rylai stepped up their play. It's too easy to handwave somebody as town because they have a town-sounding ability. Scumdocs do exist, after all.
OK I'll drop this point.
We literally just went full circle.
No we literally did not.
I want you to explain why you were sitting around at the end of the phase, with the sudden emergence of a third wagon whom you were supposedly town reading, and did nothing to support him (given Ooba had more votes than I did at this point and Ooba is increasingly likely to be scum). I don't accept "nobody asked my opinion" as a valid reason. This is a communative game, you are supposed to give your opinion no matter how stupid sounding it might be.
You didn't update your vote or even address why maintaining your vote park was okay, which would also have been acceptable. After I said that your actions were indicative of a scum read on Drezi, you said you didn't have a scum read on Drezi.
If you were really town reading Drezi, as you said you were, I feel that a town player would have said or done something. You didn't do anything except post 'Hi' after being called out for lurking.
Ooba is probably dying this phase along with Dan. If Ooba flips scum, (which you seem to agree with since you've got Ooba dropping down towards scum in your read list) then you're caught voting on the town counterwagon to scum, alongside flipped scum Sakura and Dan. The motive of your inaction and bad vote is the critical question that must be resolved before Ooba flips. I'm asking you to explain this thought in great detail because this is the sole point that your alignment can be demonstrated easily by you. And I'm seeing you evade and actually double back instead of answering evenly, and so I think the reason is -> you are scum.
How are those two statements you quoted any different?
In your point c, you imply that your role has some value (some strategic value) that is wasted if you die. That means that there's a strategic reason for why scum might want to kill you, e.g spell cards/abilities you have.
In your follow up, you left this out.
You then ramble on about scum wifom
Unless my reads happen to be spot on or they're wary of me suddenly slingshotting onto the right track, killing me is a waste of time for them.
and how scum would rather kill useful, contributing townies, that by coincidence, might include you.
These points are not in alignment, just like your reads are not in alignment, just like your actions day 1 are not in alignment.
This statement came out of nowhere too.
I'm seeing town stagnate/lose motivation because we have a confirmed scum and the secondary wagon, Ooba, isn't doing anything to defend itself. So I want to get a headstart on the next day phase by looking for a third (and fourth) lynch candidate. When we have MuffinMan, who isn't obligated to play any further, posting more content than most of the town combined, that's a problem.
