Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

White Narcissus · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:42 pm

In post 197, ZeL1nK2 wrote:
In post 194, White Narcissus wrote:
In post 192, ZeL1nK2 wrote:I don't think your assessment of "overreacting" was correct, either. Whatever tone you read in the wall he wrote back on page four was entirely different to how I read it...

I am not talking about the wall, tho i didn't like the wall either, i'm talking about #157
~Sakura

Yes, but I'm pretty sure Mikazuki was referring to this when she talked about the "overreaction" so it doesn't matter what you were talking about.

And now we will never know, because Mika will say she was referring to that post now regardless.
"I'm pretty sure" doesn't cut it.
~Sakura

ZZZX · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:43 pm

Also refusing the system is anti town for now

White Narcissus · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:44 pm

I would really appreciate if people would let me scumhunt instead of interfering with it... TIA
~Sakura

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:45 pm

"I'm pretty sure" was a euphemism for "you'd have to be blind to think otherwise".

White Narcissus · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:46 pm

In post 203, ZeL1nK2 wrote:"I'm pretty sure" was a euphemism for "you'd have to be blind to think otherwise".

I rather be thought of blind than let scum hide.
~Sakura

Mikazuki · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:52 pm

Anka: Nothing to read on. Null.

Thor and Loki: (Ermagerd Loki <3) Starts off with game mechanics discussion, wants to quicklynch NS for no reason, but that's just early game stuff. Suspicion of Gaiden makes sense, as does his stance on Taly. Also a calm and logical approach to the game, very tentative slight town lean.

ZZZX: Also nothing much, although agree that the system is probably a good idea. Null.

Skold: Not much here either, again, I don't agree with finding Taly's speculation suspicious, but that's not alignment indicative as I can see where he's coming from. Feels town, but null pending morecontent.

notscience · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:53 pm

they want to quicklynch me because theyre both bullies

also your read on them O.o

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:56 pm

I have been thinking that perhaps Loki suggested a quicklynch on notscience because they fear him as a strong town voice.

What do you have to say for yourself, Loki?

Thor and Loki · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:56 pm

In post 175, notscience wrote:top

It might be possible for us to get a single kill thanks to darkness depending on how much the darkness multiplier increases darkness, but it's probably not a route worth pursuing.

White Narcissus · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:58 pm

not liking mika. Her reads look more like summaries of what happened rather than analysis and are generally too wishy-washy. Slight scum on Taly when she doesn't even agree with the accusation on him feels opportunistic too.

~Wis

Thor and Loki · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:58 pm

In post 207, ZeL1nK2 wrote:I have been thinking that perhaps Loki suggested a quicklynch on notscience because they fear him as a strong town voice.

What do you have to say for yourself, Loki?

That was my initial thought because I misread my role PM and thought I was scum: hence my immediate retraction of the suggestion.

Good catch, though.

Mikazuki · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:58 pm

Shadowcat: Nothing to read, null.

Lufan: See above.

Witness: Not sure about his attitude towards the game so far, he's not a new player so I'm a little surprised at 69, but then again he does at least mention base line reads. Null.

Gaiden: Really wants to get the game going, very little content. As T&L pointed out, he does not vote despite thinking it's a good idea. Null, teeny tiny possibility of a scum lean if I squint.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:01 pm

Looking at Gaiden's signature, I imagine you'd have better luck milking a stone than getting content out of him. And in both cases, I'm not sure the effort is worth any potential reward.

Mikazuki · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:01 pm

In post 209, White Narcissus wrote:not liking mika. Her reads look more like summaries of what happened rather than analysis and are generally too wishy-washy. Slight scum on Taly when she doesn't even agree with the accusation on him feels opportunistic too.

~Wis

I'm scum reading based on a different basis to you, just because I am scum reading someone, does not mean I need to agree with every accusation against them.

I'm literally trying to get through this as fast as I can because I have an assignment I need to start like 2 days ago, excuse me for not bring my A game today.

White Narcissus · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:02 pm

You're also being awfully defensive.

~Wis

Thor and Loki · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:03 pm

Mikazuki's opening seems fine. I don't need people to take strong definitive stances just yet.

White Narcissus · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:04 pm

also not really a different basis than me, I also disliked his vote and talked about it. So you basically stated disagreement with my first accusation on him and sheeped the second. Wishy-washy.

~Wis

Sakura Hana · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:05 pm

In post 215, Thor and Loki wrote:Mikazuki's opening seems fine.

What
What
What

WHAT

Seriously WHAT.
What's fine about that opening

White Narcissus · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:05 pm

In post 217, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 215, Thor and Loki wrote:Mikazuki's opening seems fine.

What
What
What

WHAT

Seriously WHAT.
What's fine about that opening

Me

Mikazuki · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:06 pm

Defensive? Really? Explaining why you're wrong is defensive?

I could do this all day but I actually do need to go. I'll check back in as much as I can today.

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:06 pm

In post 212, ZeL1nK2 wrote:Looking at Gaiden's signature, I imagine you'd have better luck milking a stone than getting content out of him. And in both cases, I'm not sure the effort is worth any potential reward.

my old sig was about how good i am at "obfuscating stupidity" as scum.

Mikazuki · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:07 pm

Please, if I wanted to sheep you, I'd actually be sheeping you.

White Narcissus · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:07 pm

In post 217, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 215, Thor and Loki wrote:Mikazuki's opening seems fine.

What
What
What

WHAT

Seriously WHAT.
What's fine about that opening

just nacho disagreeing with all my reads because its fun

~Wis

Ankamius · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:10 pm

Sakura is notscience scum?

notscience · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:11 pm

In post 223, Ankamius wrote:Sakura is notscience scum?

Yes.

Read the game.