because it seems like out of my two scum reads, Mochaman could be the one closest to being lynched today because the only two votes on tojam2 are me and jachawk who I don't think has participated in a while. Maybe he has no profile picture and I'm confusing his posts with tojam2s. I have no clue.
As for now I'll throw my vote on whoever I think is scummiest VOTE: tojam2
I didn't like his reasoning for voting hawkleader nor his claim.
I'm only going to vote between the two(hawkleader3 and tojam2). Giving the mafia 2 claims for the night would be very dangerous. But I've never witnessed it myself, so I can only speculate.
In post 207, MochaMan wrote:As for now I'll throw my vote on whoever I think is scummiest VOTE: tojam2
I didn't like his reasoning for voting hawkleader nor his claim.
I'm only going to vote between the two(hawkleader3 and tojam2). Giving the mafia 2 claims for the night would be very dangerous. But I've never witnessed it myself, so I can only speculate.
That was the worst sheep on a counter wagon I've ever seen
I am not going to lynch a newbie on one wishy washy post, esspecially since I otherwise didn't have problems with him. I may be wrong about PC although he's not really helping himself. Lets see the best in a human being there.
What I am geniunly bothered with is the eventi/lia slot. I already posted how I didn't like eventi's last post, where he proddodges and points to someone who should be replaced. That wasn't great.
In post 204, Lia wrote:I'd still prefer to lynch hawkleader but if that isn't coming off then I wouldn't object to lynching jachawk, Natsu or Mocha.
Natsu's post 194 adds to my scum lean on him. And why an intent to vote rather than an actual vote?
As he's no longer at L-1
Vote: hawkleader
But this vote, I really dislike. Hawk claimed in between him being on l-1, him no longer being on l-1, and this. It was an event, but Lia doesn't mention it, just coasts on her earlier suspicion and the fact that there is a wagon. That is way too easy.
vote lia
Surrender, imagine and of course wear something nice.
Mochaman never really struck me as scummy till now
In post 193, MochaMan wrote:UNVOTE: I don't even know what's happening in this game anymore.
In post 199, mykonian wrote:Given that I'm IC I should probably expand on that post. That post by mochaman is very scummy, although the tell as I learned it was mostly effective in face to face/chat mafia. The town takes a turn or is a bit unpredictable and the scum loses track of where the game is going, but do feel the need to show that they are active. In face to face/chat it's easier to see when someone needs time to think the possibilities/threats through (which is more a thing for scum) so they get in the awkward position where they feel the need to post soon to not seem to be lurking, and otoh don't really want to say something stupid.
And that's the issue with that post really. Town wouldn't mind saying something stupid, because how stupid could it be to have a scumread on someone and say that people should be voting that. Given that Mochaman otherwise here hasn't struck me as the intimidated newbie, which could be another reason someone makes a post like that, I think that's a decent reason to put mocha on ones scumlist.
I think mykonian's post tries a bit too hard to find scum intent in what mochaman said, I am not convinced that mochaman is the right person to lynch.
On the other hand,
In post 204, Lia wrote:I'd still prefer to lynch hawkleader but if that isn't coming off then I wouldn't object to lynching jachawk, Natsu or Mocha.
Natsu's post 194 adds to my scum lean on him. And why an intent to vote rather than an actual vote?
As he's no longer at L-1
Vote: hawkleader
The post suggests an intent to lynch one of 4 people (including myself), but does not provide much reasoning. It appears that the intention is to lynch somebody rather than an effort to lynch scum.
In post 204, Lia wrote:I'd still prefer to lynch hawkleader but if that isn't coming off then I wouldn't object to lynching jachawk, Natsu or Mocha.
Natsu's post 194 adds to my scum lean on him. And why an intent to vote rather than an actual vote?
As he's no longer at L-1
Vote: hawkleader
But this vote, I really dislike. Hawk claimed in between him being on l-1, him no longer being on l-1, and this. It was an event, but Lia doesn't mention it, just coasts on her earlier suspicion and the fact that there is a wagon. That is way too easy.
The first line of my post was a direct response to hawkleader's claim so I don't see how you can say I ignored it. I said in 151 that I'd be voting hawkleader if he wasn't already at L-2 but to consider my vote there, so I was theoretically already on the wagon.
In post 210, jachawk wrote:The post suggests an intent to lynch one of 4 people (including myself), but does not provide much reasoning. It appears that the intention is to lynch somebody rather than an effort to lynch scum.
The reasoning for all but Mocha was in my earlier posts. The intention is to lynch my top scumread. However, deadline is approaching so we need to work towards the best lynch we can agree on rather than miss the lynch by not consolidating votes. We do still have a couple of days though so I'm sticking to my vote for the moment.
In post 211, tojam2 wrote:Vote intentions are fairly normal Lia.
And you haven't justified you vote, so for now...
Vote intentions tend to be used only when there's some reason for not voting (e.g. risk of hammer).
The justification for my vote is in 163 which I presume you've read? What's your opinion on my reasons?
no sorry, I don't get that post. I don't see a first line talking about hawkleaders claim. The fact that you wanted to vote him in your first post of the game really doesn't matter given that something did change after that.
Surrender, imagine and of course wear something nice.
I've been liking Mocha as town. I think scum would make use of the little activity but it seems like he wants to contribute. Fortunately, my vote has forced him out of his shell a bit imo.
In post 204, Lia wrote:I'd still prefer to lynch hawkleader but if that isn't coming off then I wouldn't object to lynching jachawk, Natsu or Mocha.
Natsu's post 194 adds to my scum lean on him. And why an intent to vote rather than an actual vote?
In post 210, jachawk wrote:The post suggests an intent to lynch one of 4 people (including myself), but does not provide much reasoning. It appears that the intention is to lynch somebody rather than an effort to lynch scum.
The reasoning for all but Mocha was in my earlier posts. The intention is to lynch my top scumread. However, deadline is approaching so we need to work towards the best lynch we can agree on rather than miss the lynch by not consolidating votes. We do still have a couple of days though so I'm sticking to my vote for the moment.
It appears that you are referring to your initial posts to justify your choice. This kind of ignores all the discussion that has occurred after your initial post, suggesting that you had pre-decided whom to lynch right from the moment you joined the game.
In post 204, Lia wrote:I'd still prefer to lynch hawkleader but if that isn't coming off then I wouldn't object to lynching jachawk, Natsu or Mocha.
Natsu's post 194 adds to my scum lean on him. And why an intent to vote rather than an actual vote?
In post 210, jachawk wrote:The post suggests an intent to lynch one of 4 people (including myself), but does not provide much reasoning. It appears that the intention is to lynch somebody rather than an effort to lynch scum.
The reasoning for all but Mocha was in my earlier posts. The intention is to lynch my top scumread. However, deadline is approaching so we need to work towards the best lynch we can agree on rather than miss the lynch by not consolidating votes. We do still have a couple of days though so I'm sticking to my vote for the moment.
It appears that you are referring to your initial posts to justify your choice. This kind of ignores all the discussion that has occurred after your initial post, suggesting that you had pre-decided whom to lynch right from the moment you joined the game.
You have reiterated that Lia knows who is town and who isn't.
Sorry for being away, been a bit busy. I think I'm finally going to vote for PC and leave it there throughout the deadline. He acts like he knows exactly who the mafia is, which doesn't seem common to me for a town to know this on Day 1. I tried looking at his other games but it appears that they are all ongoing.
In post 223, Natsu wrote:Sorry for being away, been a bit busy. I think I'm finally going to vote for PC and leave it there throughout the deadline. He acts like he knows exactly who the mafia is, which doesn't seem common to me for a town to know this on Day 1. I tried looking at his other games but it appears that they are all ongoing.
VOTE: PhantomCobalt
Could you point out what parts of my posts show "I know who the mafia is"
