... this however would not explain my result lolIn post 780, Random Nurse wrote: If I were Scum, it'd be much easier for me to claim VT than going out on such a limb.
i cannot tell if this is intentional or not
... this however would not explain my result lolIn post 780, Random Nurse wrote: If I were Scum, it'd be much easier for me to claim VT than going out on such a limb.
In post 788, medeia wrote:... this however would not explain my result lolIn post 780, Random Nurse wrote: If I were Scum, it'd be much easier for me to claim VT than going out on such a limb.
i cannot tell if this is intentional or not
In post 791, skitter30 wrote: Is
Jk
Checker
Bulletproof
Roleblocker
Ascetic
Balanced?
Plz someone who is good at this help me
In post 796, medeia wrote: but i don't actually know how often designers try to make the mafia powers line up with the towns
In post 799, skitter30 wrote: - he really, really hates protective roles and scum having no way to guarantee a kill
In post 803, ChicagoTypewriter wrote: The possibility has been raised that Random Nurse is a Mafia Roleblocker instead of Town Jailkeeper, right?
In post 795, medeia wrote: 5 vanilla town
odd-night checker
two-shot bulletproof
1 mafia ascetic/jailkeeper/roleblocker/etc
1 mafia ?
i don't know i guess to me it's not like a 'false positive' in the sense that 'this person is very probably a scums and must be eliminated' to meIn post 804, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't think false positives make sense in a micro because micros are too small[2 mislims until elo] so its p gamebreakingIn post 796, medeia wrote: so i potentially get false positives from jailkeeper and roleblocker, but true positive from ascetic,
like if we don't have any useful information then thats just bad setup design
In post 807, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: i think
odd night checker
2 shot bulletproof
2 mafia ascetic
5 VT
makes sense as a setup
if mafia had a roleblocker it would not really make sense imo
In post 813, ceejayvinoya wrote:In post 725, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i think if hes town we're gonna loseIn post 723, sheepsaysmeep wrote: pooky do u think anything about ceeja vinoya
wow this was a bit rude
In post 821, sheepsaysmeep wrote: imagine media is scum, tried to nightkill someone other than chicago, was blocked by nurse's jail
In post 833, medeia wrote:In post 821, sheepsaysmeep wrote: imagine media is scum, tried to nightkill someone other than chicago, was blocked by nurse's jail
and then what?
i somehow divined that i was jailed and decided to fakeclaim?
despite being widely townread and despite the fact that chicagotypewriter had already provided another plausible explanation for the missing nightkill?
In post 832, medeia wrote:In post 813, ceejayvinoya wrote:In post 725, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i think if hes town we're gonna loseIn post 723, sheepsaysmeep wrote: pooky do u think anything about ceeja vinoya
wow this was a bit rude
hm
not really sure how much sense this makes either
like i think(?) ceejayvinoya is generally townread here and our chances seem worse to me if he's scum
are you worried that ceejayvinoya will be miseliminated at some point if he's town? or that his view of the game is wrong and he's unlikely to find the scums? or..?
In post 826, skitter30 wrote: Idk abt random nurse but idk if we flip them either
mm, actually could still do the no nightkill thing towards this end i guess, sighIn post 836, medeia wrote: prevents a nightkill tonight then it confirms random nurse
In post 847, Random Nurse wrote:In post 796, medeia wrote:In post 791, skitter30 wrote: Is
Jk
Checker
Bulletproof
Roleblocker
Ascetic
Balanced?
Plz someone who is good at this help me
uh, well i not good at this, but! i am here
so i potentially get false positives from jailkeeper and roleblocker, but true positive from ascetic,
i kinda think the roleblocker would probably be something else if this were the case? like maybe 1-shot strongman or a rolecop or something
just seems like so many potential false positives and! hard for mafias to interact with both the jailkeeper and bulletproof
but i don't actually know how often designers try to make the mafia powers line up with the towns
no database for micro normals because they're usually not played in the normal queue +/
Being jailed wouldn't you not get any result if you tried using an investigative PR? You would just get "No Result," correct?
In post 849, Random Nurse wrote:In post 848, medeia wrote:In post 847, Random Nurse wrote:In post 796, medeia wrote:In post 791, skitter30 wrote: Is
Jk
Checker
Bulletproof
Roleblocker
Ascetic
Balanced?
Plz someone who is good at this help me
uh, well i not good at this, but! i am here
so i potentially get false positives from jailkeeper and roleblocker, but true positive from ascetic,
i kinda think the roleblocker would probably be something else if this were the case? like maybe 1-shot strongman or a rolecop or something
just seems like so many potential false positives and! hard for mafias to interact with both the jailkeeper and bulletproof
but i don't actually know how often designers try to make the mafia powers line up with the towns
no database for micro normals because they're usually not played in the normal queue +/
Being jailed wouldn't you not get any result if you tried using an investigative PR? You would just get "No Result," correct?
i believe this is true of most investigative prs but
checker is simply checking to see whether it gets a result or no result however
like ‘result’ = successful, ‘no result’ = not successful
and i would get an identical not successful regardless of why the check failed i believe
...
...
Could you share a paraphrased role PM on this?
In post 850, medeia wrote:In post 849, Random Nurse wrote:In post 848, medeia wrote:In post 847, Random Nurse wrote:In post 796, medeia wrote:In post 791, skitter30 wrote: Is
Jk
Checker
Bulletproof
Roleblocker
Ascetic
Balanced?
Plz someone who is good at this help me
uh, well i not good at this, but! i am here
so i potentially get false positives from jailkeeper and roleblocker, but true positive from ascetic,
i kinda think the roleblocker would probably be something else if this were the case? like maybe 1-shot strongman or a rolecop or something
just seems like so many potential false positives and! hard for mafias to interact with both the jailkeeper and bulletproof
but i don't actually know how often designers try to make the mafia powers line up with the towns
no database for micro normals because they're usually not played in the normal queue +/
Being jailed wouldn't you not get any result if you tried using an investigative PR? You would just get "No Result," correct?
i believe this is true of most investigative prs but
checker is simply checking to see whether it gets a result or no result however
like ‘result’ = successful, ‘no result’ = not successful
and i would get an identical not successful regardless of why the check failed i believe
...
...
Could you share a paraphrased role PM on this?
i mean,
checks someone to see whether my action was successful
can also link the wiki if you want or you can ask the mod
In post 854, skitter30 wrote:How do u feel abt voting pookyIn post 837, medeia wrote:mm, actually could still do the no nightkill thing towards this end i guess, sighIn post 836, medeia wrote: prevents a nightkill tonight then it confirms random nurse
nevermind
In post 896, medeia wrote: just dunno how pooky would be so sure
In post 879, Random Nurse wrote: IF CT flips Town, then I'd say look at Medeia since I did jail her and there was no NK—maybe she performed the NK action (look into this late game).
In post 890, ChicagoTypewriter wrote: It's becoming increasingly likely to me that you are, in fact, a mafia aesthetic (hence the town odd-checker); and likely there's a hidden town pr right now with information gathering powers (i.e. cop or something) that has claimed VT
In post 891, Random Nurse wrote: You say that, but it's too convenient knowing that I jailed Medeia Night 1.
If I were Scum I'd have no reason to counter-claim in response to your Bulletproof claim. It'd be so much easier to just pretend to be a VT.
In post 892, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: also we could just no lim here if we want to get fancy and see who dies with the JK leashed to the Checker
In post 885, Random Nurse wrote: Why do you refuse to vote Chicago, Sheep?
In post 879, Random Nurse wrote: VOTE: Chicago
I think Chicago is the optimal lim today. I claimed Jailkeeper because I don't believe his Bulletproof claim; I don't see BP and JK in the same setup but I'm not 100% on that. If you lim me you lose your JK early, but chances are extremely high I'll be NK'd tonight anyways. There is a chance Scum opts to leave me alive Night 2 to set me up for a mis-lim Day 3.
IF CT flips Town, then I'd say look at Medeia since I did jail her and there was no NK—maybe she performed the NK action (look into this late game).
In post 909, sheepsaysmeep wrote: Have fun training
In post 938, ChicagoTypewriter wrote: Okay, so I think I haven't been keeping up - I know there's a thought that the town JK should have JK'd me last night which would be pretty good play; but there are equally valid play options, right?
In post 923, skitter30 wrote:like i said i don't hate thisIn post 920, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: and the scum would only be able to shoot in one of the VT claims and that narrows the field for us.
if the scum shoot RN and he's town obviously that also helps us more than if we were to eliminate him here
In post 941, Random Nurse wrote: I personally feel a Chicago lim today would help sort out the mystery of these various claims, but if not today, then when? Day 3? Do I need to get NK'd before Town lims CT?
In post 943, Random Nurse wrote: To be honest you sound worried that I would push you as Mafia when I wasn't currently thinking it when you mentioned this.
In post 945, Random Nurse wrote:In post 944, medeia wrote:In post 943, Random Nurse wrote: To be honest you sound worried that I would push you as Mafia when I wasn't currently thinking it when you mentioned this.
it felt like that's what you were saying to me here with the 'various claims' thing and you said it earlier as well like
'let's eliminate chicagotypewriter! but if it's not chicagotypewriter then maybe it's medeia...'
like you've just been ignoring why that doesn't make sense
Why do you think it doesn't make sense?
I jailed you last night. There was no night kill. It's of course a possibility that it was you who attempted it.
Again, I don't know if that's what happened, but please don't presume that scenario is impossible.
In post 899, medeia wrote:In post 879, Random Nurse wrote: IF CT flips Town, then I'd say look at Medeia since I did jail her and there was no NK—maybe she performed the NK action (look into this late game).
i just recently discussed this with sheepsaysmeep but
if i were the one performing the nightkill and my nightkill was blocked by your jailkeeper action
how would i have known i was jailkept in order to claim checker with an unsuccessful result?
and why would i have done so when i was widely townread instead of just like 'oh maybe i was saved'? (which i still think is possible for what it's worth like if you're town it seems somewhat likely to me that i was saved like i am quite often nightkilled and i don't think scums generally view me as someone to miseliminate in the future) especially given that chicagotypewriter had already provided another possible explanation for the missing nightkill with his claim
also i know that scenario is impossibleIn post 945, Random Nurse wrote: but please don't presume that scenario is impossible.
In post 949, Random Nurse wrote: Did you claim Checker before or after I claimed Jailkeeper?
In post 733, medeia wrote:In post 728, sheepsaysmeep wrote: I think if anyone else had a mechanism of stopping the nightkill they should just hardclaim?
if no one does then chicago is 100% confirmed town which is nice
and if something gets outed then oh well the day before MELO is an ok day for massclaim anyways
i, kinda want to massclaim here anyway for related and un-related reasons i guess
like in theory chicagotypewriter could have not nightkilled to try to confirm self and such so not 100%
but also,
i am an odd-night checker and my action on random nurse last night was not successful which is the only maybe relevant result i am capable of (i think) and there's probably a reason my role is in the setup, so
or at the very least for random nurse to claim or if someone else has an explanation for the above and also if there's another reason for the missing nightkill? i guess
In post 953, Random Nurse wrote:In post 950, medeia wrote:In post 949, Random Nurse wrote: Did you claim Checker before or after I claimed Jailkeeper?
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
before
...
Hm. The post #s check out.
However, Mafia Checkers are possible.
Meaning, you being Scum is still possible.
In post 967, Random Nurse wrote:In post 966, ChicagoTypewriter wrote: So your theory is the scum have a checker "just cause"?
I'm saying it's possible.
hm, kinda wanna ask what your current read of me is thenIn post 996, Random Nurse wrote:In post 988, skitter30 wrote: She's like >95% town via reads, which i trust more than mechanics
Why are u trying to convince me she's scum
I'm not trying to convince you she's Scum. I'm trying to convince you she's not 100% Town as if she's mod-confirmed.
Understand the difference?
In post 984, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: the obvious answer for why scum medeia would know to claim checker is if she was the mafia who carried out the nightkill and it wasnt on mr bulletproof so she knows she got blocked.
In post 999, Random Nurse wrote:In post 997, medeia wrote:In post 967, Random Nurse wrote:In post 966, ChicagoTypewriter wrote: So your theory is the scum have a checker "just cause"?
I'm saying it's possible.
but do you think it is likely?
like to me it felt like you might have been trying to position yourself to try to eliminate me in case of chicagotypewriter green flip which conveniently would win the game for scum!you
and now you're on some sort of quest to get everyone to concede that i am in fact not an innocent child
which given but that doesn't make me anymore likely to be a scums? and i feel like there are a lot of things pointing towards the fact that i am town here which you're ignoring to say
'but it is possible!!' as if you just want people to doubt
I don't like how you're squirming like this.
I'm saying it's possible you're still Scum. Point blank. PERIOD.
STOP. TRYING. to pretend otherwise.
You're trying to make it sound like there's NO WAY you could POSSIBLY be Scum. I'm not even arguing you're Scum: I just don't like you trying to pretend you're mod-confirmed Town.
In post 1001, Random Nurse wrote: I WAS Townreading ypu Day 1. Then I jailed you Night 1 and the NK magically didn't happen.
SO, there's different possibilities here.
I DO NOT like you trying, ON DAY 2, to pretend you're mod-confirmed Town. You can STILL be Scum, but you FIGHTING me on that mere fact is NOT looking good in my eyes.
In post 989, sheepsaysmeep wrote: I'll stop myself from repeating after this last time that this posting is like blaringly Town Random Nurse to me if I have any idea how to read him lol
In post 1005, Random Nurse wrote: Also, don't put me in a box on how I play as Town. I'm perfectly happy engaging with anyone when I am able.
In post 1024, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: mb its better to no lim rather than lim random nurse because if he's town he's going to get NKed
In post 903, medeia wrote:but if we're going to eliminate random nurse here anyway then maybe we consider sleeping first? because when we sleep becomes less meaningful i think and! if we were going to eliminate random nurse and random nurse is nightkilled then that is obviously beneficial
In post 1031, brassherald wrote: UNVOTE:
Yeah random nurse is not a good elim. What was Ceejay thinking? I can't say because I didn't read if he explained it
In post 1012, sheepsaysmeep wrote: theyre just so different that my gut is screaming
In post 818, Random Nurse wrote: gutvibes screaming on that one.
In post 1033, brassherald wrote: It's not mod confirmed by any stretch of the imagination, but now if rn is town we're just doing mafia's job for them.
I also think in terms of balance right now the jailkeeper is an odd man out role for town. It's a smaller set up. But on the off chance that it is town I'd rather hit RN day 3 and no elim today over that claim today.
I'm blanking on the math here but it also may just be better play to no elim on a day with even players get all info we can from day 2 and then see what happens Night 2. It may actually mathematically get us to an endgame where we need to get the right elimination at the same time whether we eliminate today or not
In post 1037, brassherald wrote:What is the point of this?In post 1035, medeia wrote:In post 1012, sheepsaysmeep wrote: theyre just so different that my gut is screamingIn post 818, Random Nurse wrote: gutvibes screaming on that one.