In post 2472, Nero Cain wrote:I'd really appreciate it if you'd read the game.
i am reading the game ftr. i missed like 2% ... where i skimmed like 2 pages and didn't realize sanges was screened. don't use that against me like it's something
In post 2472, Nero Cain wrote:I'd really appreciate it if you'd read the game.
In post 2474, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 2472, Nero Cain wrote:So you don't think the TWL slot looks "super duper town", however, I am also scummy for thinking the same thing as you?
no sangres doesn't look super duper town
!
In post 2472, Nero Cain wrote:So you don't think the TWL slot looks "super duper town", however, I am also scummy for thinking the same thing as you?
In post 2471, Mantisdreamz wrote:like i said before i think i may be buying into mala's frustrations
This seems pretty nullish to me. I think fake frustration or being frustrated over something that there's not really a need to be frustrated over is scummy. True, Mala seems frustrated for no good reason all the time...like that last game we played, there was a player named Neil and according to his own words (in endgame) he had decided to intentionally play scummy to not get shot. Well during the course of the game I suspected Neil who was basically baiting me into thinking he was scum...so anyways, Mala just started throwing a fit and yelling at me b/c I didn't have the same inside information that she had but I would think that her being "frustrated" would carry over to her being scum or are you saying that when she is scum she doesn't show frustration? Like I haven't (and don't really have any intention to) metadive her and I don't remember playing with her as scum so please explain the differences between malatown and malascum.
I've said about 2 or 3 times that the reason that I originally found them scummy 'cause Mala tried to write off Brian's guilty as fake. I'd really appreciate it if you'd read the game.
What do you think about my recent responds?
In post 2472, Nero Cain wrote:
I've said about 2 or 3 times that the reason that I originally found them scummy 'cause Mala tried to write off Brian's guilty as fake.
I'd really appreciate it if you'd read the game.
What do you think about my recent responds?
In post 2359, sangres wrote:IIRC there's one vote on SnowStorm. Ours.
Your disagreement re SnowStorm keeps reminding of your disagreement with me in the Advance Wars game about ABR. I think it was because you thought it was scummy of me in that game too.
In post 2365, Nikanor wrote:I don't see how Mala claiming her identity changes peoples' reads on her, especially when a few of those people had already hunched it.
In post 2369, Bookitty wrote:Nikanor is suspect to me because of events surrounding the BROseidon claim and his own comments regarding playing "neutrally" (my wording, not his) in case he was the Sleeper. This didn't feel like a town thought process to me. Also, Nikanor didn't want to be screened and made it quite clear at that time.
In post 2369, Bookitty wrote:Mantisdreamz is continually behind the game but trying to post things that look relevant. This looks like trying to stay off the radar while contributing little or nothing. The most recent case occurred after your question,when Mantis was still trying to determine who should be the screen.
In post 2378, THE WRONG WAGON wrote:Also VR is still a lame scan for all the same reasons as before.
In post 2389, Porochaz wrote:Snowstorm seems scummy.
In post 2391, Nikanor wrote:Just thought of this now: there probably is a Cylon ninja, but ooba performed the kill n1 because he would have the least chance of being RB'd on n1. The risk of him being tracked was moot because he had been inspected anyway. I believe that ValiliaRei stopped last night's nightkill by protecting Toogeloo.
In post 2447, sangres wrote:P, you asked us about Brian. We have some concerns. Will flesh them out tonight.
In post 2464, Nikanor wrote:d3: ValiliaRei (After she was practically cleared by Brian)
In post 2413, ValiliaRei wrote:You're the one who isn't understanding my question - why is a policy lynch better than lynching someone you find scummy, no matter how slight?
In post 2421, Toogeloo wrote:Policy Lynches should be reserved for when it's clearly advantageous to do so and when no other reasonable lynch can be determined.In post 2420, AngryPidgeon wrote:If you don't like PLs then you don't like PLs. RIP is a PL because he is hard to understand and extremely frustrating. Plus, I don't see any compelling reasons to be townreading him right now.
It's Day 3, and Policy Lynching viability shouldn't really exist at this point.
In post 2486, Porochaz wrote:
Im not against this, but at the same time (and to answer Brians question) Snowstorm is emerging to be one of the best two wagons. LLD and Snowstorm have not played well. LLD is getting better and Snow is getting worse. I expect more from LLD, which we are kinda getting, almost. Snowstorms last post swings it too him,the LLD vote with no other content in that postmakes me happy to
vote Snowstorm
Time to step up a bit.
In post 2487, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2486, Porochaz wrote:
Im not against this, but at the same time (and to answer Brians question) Snowstorm is emerging to be one of the best two wagons. LLD and Snowstorm have not played well. LLD is getting better and Snow is getting worse. I expect more from LLD, which we are kinda getting, almost. Snowstorms last post swings it too him,the LLD vote with no other content in that postmakes me happy to
vote Snowstorm
Time to step up a bit.
In my defense, she did it first.I confronted her with my opinion on her explanation on why she thought my day 1 voting patterns were suspicious and she replied with a vote. I was trying to get a read on her, while she didn't even care to answer me and defend her pov, nor did she bother to explain her vote either, which as far as I know is based on my day 1 votees "making sense from a scum perspective". And yet, you vote me saying she's playing better and I'm placing votes "with no other content"? Bullshit.
In post 2489, Porochaz wrote:Your NO U defence is scummy. If you want me to believe you are town, change the record.
In post 2490, Brian Skies wrote:In post 2489, Porochaz wrote:Your NO U defence is scummy. If you want me to believe you are town, change the record.
Why is it okay for LLD to do something you think is scummy, but not Snowstorm?
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2490, Brian Skies wrote:In post 2489, Porochaz wrote:Your NO U defence is scummy. If you want me to believe you are town, change the record.
Why is it okay for LLD to do something you think is scummy, but not Snowstorm?
Show me where I've done what Prozac has described.
In post 2424, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2400, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2399, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
These three kind of exemplify what I'm talking about. For most of the early stages he sits on the Andrius wagon, which I'm certain he's content to do, he can claim to be applying pressure and not be totally lying.
The Toog vote isn't that awful in content, but in hindsight looks dreadful. With the so many people who are either dead or basically alignment confirmed on the 5 man Bro wagon, it's hard to see more scum being there at the moment. On the other hand, Snowstorm moving to Toog and creating a viable counterwagon works decently to give Bro a chance to work his way out.
When is becomes clear (after Prozac unvotes to avoid an early L-1) that Brosideon will be lynched today, Snow takes the chance to get on the wagon, make it L-1, and try and scoop some town cred without having to hammer.
It's not a perfect vote analysis, I mean it's one day, but the motivations of his votes make a lot of sense from a scum perspective.
You mean, the motivations you creatively assigned to my votes?
I voted Andrius because he was my strongest lead and I sat on his wagon until I was unhappy with it.
Toog wagon, you're aware you were on it, right? (Is that why you say it wasn't "that awful in content"?) Do you really think BRO had a chance? There wasn't much momentum to the Toog wagon, scum would be fooling themselves if they thought they could save BRO by pushing a Toog lynch.
I didn't vote BRO for imaginary town cred, I voted him because he was getting lynched, and to get a lynch, we need votes! (Funny, you were the hammer. Did you do it for town cred?)
Are you scum reading me?
Vote: Snowstorm
In post 2429, THE WRONG WAGON wrote:My townread on Mantis is slowly dying. Dying.
It's obv that she's not reading the game, but she's skimming and trying to look useful rather than actually being useful.
Not realizing the sangres' screen was locked bothered me.
I could potentially see her flipping scum.
Sangres is bothering me because neither Fery nor Nacho is trying to sort us out, which is awk af tbh.
~Mala
In post 2470, Mantisdreamz wrote:because even what TWL said, sangres hasn't really been trying to figure out their alignment.
i guess i'm still waiting for them to look super duper town. and it has not happened.
In post 2494, SnowStorm wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2490, Brian Skies wrote:In post 2489, Porochaz wrote:Your NO U defence is scummy. If you want me to believe you are town, change the record.
Why is it okay for LLD to do something you think is scummy, but not Snowstorm?
Show me where I've done what Prozac has described.
Here:
In post 2424, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2400, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2399, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
These three kind of exemplify what I'm talking about. For most of the early stages he sits on the Andrius wagon, which I'm certain he's content to do, he can claim to be applying pressure and not be totally lying.
The Toog vote isn't that awful in content, but in hindsight looks dreadful. With the so many people who are either dead or basically alignment confirmed on the 5 man Bro wagon, it's hard to see more scum being there at the moment. On the other hand, Snowstorm moving to Toog and creating a viable counterwagon works decently to give Bro a chance to work his way out.
When is becomes clear (after Prozac unvotes to avoid an early L-1) that Brosideon will be lynched today, Snow takes the chance to get on the wagon, make it L-1, and try and scoop some town cred without having to hammer.
It's not a perfect vote analysis, I mean it's one day, but the motivations of his votes make a lot of sense from a scum perspective.
You mean, the motivations you creatively assigned to my votes?
I voted Andrius because he was my strongest lead and I sat on his wagon until I was unhappy with it.
Toog wagon, you're aware you were on it, right? (Is that why you say it wasn't "that awful in content"?) Do you really think BRO had a chance? There wasn't much momentum to the Toog wagon, scum would be fooling themselves if they thought they could save BRO by pushing a Toog lynch.
I didn't vote BRO for imaginary town cred, I voted him because he was getting lynched, and to get a lynch, we need votes! (Funny, you were the hammer. Did you do it for town cred?)
Are you scum reading me?
Vote: Snowstorm
It's what Poro described, a post with a vote and no content.
In post 2494, SnowStorm wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2490, Brian Skies wrote:In post 2489, Porochaz wrote:Your NO U defence is scummy. If you want me to believe you are town, change the record.
Why is it okay for LLD to do something you think is scummy, but not Snowstorm?
Show me where I've done what Prozac has described.
Here:
In post 2424, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2400, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2399, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
These three kind of exemplify what I'm talking about. For most of the early stages he sits on the Andrius wagon, which I'm certain he's content to do, he can claim to be applying pressure and not be totally lying.
The Toog vote isn't that awful in content, but in hindsight looks dreadful. With the so many people who are either dead or basically alignment confirmed on the 5 man Bro wagon, it's hard to see more scum being there at the moment. On the other hand, Snowstorm moving to Toog and creating a viable counterwagon works decently to give Bro a chance to work his way out.
When is becomes clear (after Prozac unvotes to avoid an early L-1) that Brosideon will be lynched today, Snow takes the chance to get on the wagon, make it L-1, and try and scoop some town cred without having to hammer.
It's not a perfect vote analysis, I mean it's one day, but the motivations of his votes make a lot of sense from a scum perspective.
You mean, the motivations you creatively assigned to my votes?
I voted Andrius because he was my strongest lead and I sat on his wagon until I was unhappy with it.
Toog wagon, you're aware you were on it, right? (Is that why you say it wasn't "that awful in content"?) Do you really think BRO had a chance? There wasn't much momentum to the Toog wagon, scum would be fooling themselves if they thought they could save BRO by pushing a Toog lynch.
I didn't vote BRO for imaginary town cred, I voted him because he was getting lynched, and to get a lynch, we need votes! (Funny, you were the hammer. Did you do it for town cred?)
Are you scum reading me?
Vote: Snowstorm
It's what Poro described, a post with a vote and no content.