Open 431 - Sword Swallowing - Game Over

Thomas · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:25 pm

When? Right now you are interrogating me and before... I dunno. "It's complicated" came from facebook. So should I ask you "any scumhunting justification for this question?" Right now you're just asking weird questions. Do you play like this in all games?

Scigatt · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:42 am

In post 25, Thomas wrote:When? Right now you are interrogating me and before... I dunno. "It's complicated" came from facebook. So should I ask you "any scumhunting justification for this question?" Right now you're just asking weird questions. Do you play like this in all games?

Posts 17 and 19 were asking for the relevance of what's quoted w.r.t. scumhunting. If that's not trying to get out of RVS, then what is?

Siveure DtTrikyp · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:16 am

Progressing the RVS.

Who's the best player in this group? Let's lynch that person...

On second thoughts, no, bad idea. We want a choice for scums between confirmed innocents and townie players.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:23 am

I think the best player in this group is between Amrun, Scigatt and myself, considering we have the most experience (I've actually been playing for probably two years now, since I started offsite).
Regardless that's a stupid plan, unless Amrun and Scigatt are scum, which would actually be kinda funny :V

Scigatt · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:37 am

In post 27, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Progressing the RVS.

Who's the best player in this group? Let's lynch that person...

On second thoughts, no, bad idea. We want a choice for scums between confirmed innocents and townie players.

What confirmed innocents? Unless you think the scum are extremely ballsy/stupid, there will be effectively none.

Siveure DtTrikyp · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:21 am

If we lynch anyone and they don't die, they're confirmed innocent. Those confirmed innocents. If that person is also a VI, it's not necessarily scums best interest to shoot them.

Scigatt · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:25 am

In post 30, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:If we lynch anyone and they don't die, they're confirmed innocent. Those confirmed innocents. If that person is also a VI, it's not necessarily scums best interest to shoot them.

But that creates a 'backlog' of confirmed innocents, which would be dangerous in lylo for the scum.

splitfarvle · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:47 am

Going out of town on short notice.

V/LA until Monday

Thomas · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 1:33 pm

I'm gonna link you to the wiki because you don't understand what RQS is: http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=RQS

Scigatt · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:38 pm

In post 33, Thomas wrote:I'm gonna link you to the wiki because you don't understand what RQS is: http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=RQS

I was trying to get us out of it. That's all we need now.

Thomas · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:23 pm

Well it's not easy to do when nobody is posting.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:35 pm

Post.

Scigatt · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:44 pm

In post 36, Om of the Nom wrote:Post.

Very funny.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:46 pm

I'm a comedian :3

TheShadow · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:11 pm

lol...

Seriously though, no activity means nothing to analyze to help get out of RVS...

Om of the Nom · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:13 pm

I claim scum.
My partner is saulres.

Discuss.

Thomas · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:19 pm

I'm blacklisting Om of the Nom.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:21 pm

LOL.
That was such an obvious joke claim.
As if you would have taken it seriously.

TheShadow · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:22 pm

And here comes a modkill..

If he is scum, that's a violation of General Rule 2.

Mod in General Rule 2 wrote:Play to win. Players want to win legitimately, don't ruin their enjoyment by playing against your wincon.

If not, then it brings in General Rule 10, re: rule 2.

Mod in General Rule 10 wrote:Pretending to break a rule will be treated the same as breaking the rule.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:24 pm

That isn't playing against my wincon.
It's a joke claim, you shouldn't even take it seriously.

Thomas · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:26 pm

So was that a pro-town thing to do?

Om of the Nom · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:27 pm

Well the action itself wasn't pro-town, but it wasn't meant to be. It was supposed to make discussion and get people to post, and that's exactly what it did. Therefore the result is pro-town.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:28 pm

In other words I'm actually playing to my wincon if you actually look close enough.

Thomas · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:28 pm

Oh so we are creating discussion towards you and that is pro-town because you're scum?

Om of the Nom · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:30 pm

It's only towards me if you direct it towards me. I made the joke claim to get people to post and discuss things instead of lazing around and doing nothing. I got us completely out of the RVS. If this isn't pro-town then I don't know what is.