I can't think of a reason that could motivate his change, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
The obvious event preceding it was Cephrir's claim, implying that Cephrir's claim had some such effect on his attitude, but if it's just that Reck interacts with Cephrir's ability, you'd think he'd want to claim now to ensure that Cephrir would use his ability in a certain way, since it's a night action.
I have no particular issue with massclaim at this point, but I'm fine with delaying it and assessing whether the pattern of asking for it and asking for it to be delayed end up making sense.
In post 3093, shos wrote:well, you started out by claiming to be all-worst result, and then took it back immediately when prompted? we still don't know if exists/who a tracker. Also, how does the flavor fit with the miller thing? when the mod fucks up the VC explains the vote switch, but not the miller.
That's how I remembered it. I didn't have any particular reason to care what kind of miller I am after my first post and forgot. I have no particular scum motivation for forgetting, so it's quite apparent my not feeling like rereading my role PM at that moment is not alignment indicative.
In post 3095, shos wrote:At first you claim non-standard miller.
Then you say you return the worst result to everything.
Then, when prompted, you take that back, saying it's just X/Not X.
so what's non-standard? and how does this fit flavor?
As best I am aware regular millers just turn up guilty to regular cops/"appear as mafia to investigation" etc. I would also turn up guilty to some non standard roles. Like I dunno, probably if there was some stupid role like a fairy/not fairy cop I would give them a strange result.
could you elaborate on the "non standardness" of the wording of X/not X?
I already did
In post 3105, Wisdom wrote:So what do you guys think of reck spamming in favor of massclaim yet now wanting to delay it?
I wish he would stop being a cagey fuck and answer the question, but there could be a legitimate reason I guess... just because I can't think of it doesn't mean it's fake
In post 3106, Iecerint wrote:I can't think of a reason that could motivate his change, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
The obvious event preceding it was Cephrir's claim, implying that Cephrir's claim had some such effect on his attitude, but if it's just that Reck interacts with Cephrir's ability, you'd think he'd want to claim now to ensure that Cephrir would use his ability in a certain way, since it's a night action.
I have no particular issue with massclaim at this point, but I'm fine with delaying it and assessing whether the pattern of asking for it and asking for it to be delayed end up making sense.
I would think he'd then be encouraging me not to do nothing tonight.
In post 3110, Cephrir wrote:I would think he'd then be encouraging me not to do nothing tonight.
Yes, I stipulated as much partly to remind him indirectly if it would in fact be necessary (if town), or to limit the ability for him to "misunderstand" aspects of your role tomorrow when he claims such that the implied goods don't show up (if scum).
