In post 370, Lying Cat wrote:Okay, here's the rub. I'm soloing this game for the foreseeable future. sthar8 may come back, he may not, but I intend to rock the shit out of this game for him.
Rock the shit out of it.
Now who should I be voting?
In post 369, Thor665 wrote:Concrete is trying to become one, trying very hard.
In post 371, Lying Cat wrote:Thor, I'm not getting off my vanity wagon on you. It's too nice and shiny. And I'm too hip to follow all the other kids around. If all of your friends were lynching people, would you just follow along blindly?
In post 374, Concrete Angels wrote:I have a couple of games with him, mostly ongoing because he replaces in like a Constantine (without the trolling), and from his play in those games I made a value judgement. I conclude that he has a high propensity to be a mislynch target. Thus, I'm setting the sensitivity meter on vedith to low.
In post 377, Thor665 wrote:What does that have to do with lurking?
Did he lurk a lot in those games you read?
Was he mislynched for being a lurker?
In post 368, pistachi0n wrote:What do you think about Vedith and Concrete Angels?
In post 378, Concrete Angels wrote:In post 377, Thor665 wrote:What does that have to do with lurking?
Did he lurk a lot in those games you read?
Was he mislynched for being a lurker?
Considering the fact that these questions are regarding ongoing games, I'm suggesting that MS not explain those particular reasons any further, and stick to ideas based on this game.
If you have a point or conclusion you are trying to reach with questions about MS' read on Vedith, get to it. Otherwise, it just looks like questions for the sake of questions.
Most people find my reason's weak. You won't be the first and sure as shit won't be the last.
Why were you town reading a spot on page one?
Can you say they were strong?
I just do what I feel when I read things, maybe I should stop that but I see scum stubble more when pushed then town.
In post 229, Ankamius wrote:No, the wagon was town driven. It was scum-sheeped.
In post 236, pistachi0n wrote:Farside you are making me suspicious.
Asking for name claims and justifying it with vague "I have a reason"
In post 382, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I have no issue with your questioning; just the path it was going. the rephrasing is fine I think.
In post 385, massive wrote:What, was me saying "farside town (gut)" not good enough for you?
In post 354, Vedith wrote:
So, Cataphant - When you are back, lets talk. I assume 228 is about your counter wagon? Can we go more in depth about that? At this stage myself, Concrete and Ank were on you. I'd like to see what you think of 229. Regardless of what you think of me. Do you think that any scum were on this wagon?
In post 371, Lying Cat wrote:It occurs to me that Cataphant never responded to my questions before my absence. I'd like to rectify that. Cataphant, why do you believe farside to be town?
Thor, I'm not getting off my vanity wagon on you. It's too nice and shiny. And I'm too hip to follow all the other kids around. If all of your friends were lynching people, would you just follow along blindly?
In post 385, massive wrote:What, was me saying "farside town (gut)" not good enough for you?
In post 389, Cataphant wrote:The fact we are voting you suggests you, really, doesn't it? Like, what was the point of that question? I'm assuming Ank is not calling herself scum, and calling it town driven, so by POE she must think CA is scummy. Unless she was talking about the original wagon on you, which was 'Concrete Angels, Thor665, Cataphant, Hecatia Lapislazuli'. If Ank thinks some of those were 'scum sheeping', I think you should ask her who, not us 0.0
In post 390, farside22 wrote:In post 387, Concrete Angels wrote:I assume you meant subtle because "sutle" is not a word.
Bingo.
In post 391, Vedith wrote:In post 389, Cataphant wrote:The fact we are voting you suggests you, really, doesn't it? Like, what was the point of that question? I'm assuming Ank is not calling herself scum, and calling it town driven, so by POE she must think CA is scummy. Unless she was talking about the original wagon on you, which was 'Concrete Angels, Thor665, Cataphant, Hecatia Lapislazuli'. If Ank thinks some of those were 'scum sheeping', I think you should ask her who, not us 0.0
I said regardless of me. Of course you think I'm scum but how about the other 2 on yours?
In post 381, Thor665 wrote:In post 378, Concrete Angels wrote:In post 377, Thor665 wrote:What does that have to do with lurking?
Did he lurk a lot in those games you read?
Was he mislynched for being a lurker?
Considering the fact that these questions are regarding ongoing games, I'm suggesting that MS not explain those particular reasons any further, and stick to ideas based on this game.
If you have a point or conclusion you are trying to reach with questions about MS' read on Vedith, get to it. Otherwise, it just looks like questions for the sake of questions.
You are well aware of how I scumhunt so this feels pretty pathetic as a raised issue.
Allow me to rephrase the question to a yes/no one with no discussion of ongoing games included;
In MS's opinion - is specific game lurking part of Vedith's town meta?
There, that is a legit question that *can* be answered.
In post 375, Concrete Angels wrote:In post 370, Lying Cat wrote:Okay, here's the rub. I'm soloing this game for the foreseeable future. sthar8 may come back, he may not, but I intend to rock the shit out of this game for him.
Rock the shit out of it.
Now who should I be voting?
If you're scum I'll rock the shit out of you. This time with ETL boost. Be warned.
If you're town, date me ^^
Ms
In post 377, Thor665 wrote:In post 371, Lying Cat wrote:Thor, I'm not getting off my vanity wagon on you. It's too nice and shiny. And I'm too hip to follow all the other kids around. If all of your friends were lynching people, would you just follow along blindly?
If I was voting a wagon that was going nowhere and wasn't pushing it - I'd hope so.
Then again, I try to play pro-town, so there may be a difference in playstyle there.