In post 3311, Sensei wrote:Why are you voting pisskop, again?
Because of his contradiction about Dwlee's flavor, originally. And it is staying there, as a self-preservation vote, unless something better comes up.
In post 3311, Sensei wrote:Why are you voting pisskop, again?
In post 3306, Sensei wrote:You, as an alignment cop, being such firm believer in that there can't be overlap in claims ever, should have been a lot more positive on a beeboy scumflip then you were.
I'm like 99% positive that you're scum.
In post 3323, Sensei wrote:Like, maybe if he'd of said something to the effect of not wanting to CC right away to get some results first? I might of bought that.
In post 3326, Sensei wrote:In post 3324, Dwlee99 wrote:just realized the logic I used was wrong because of the fact that xkyfu would have to cc his scum partner and that if xkyfu is scum if gives no insight on cakes' alignment.
It doesn't give much insight but I think it makes cakes more likely town at least.
In post 3371, Phoenix Wright wrote:He didn't move and the scum killed that night. Why wouldn't I trust him?
In post 3374, Sensei wrote:Why is that suspicious?
Just because his reasoning was awful doesn't mean that it wasn't honest.
In post 3418, Phoenix Wright wrote:Actually, just realized that his lynch pool includes basically everyone lol.
In post 3417, Nahdia wrote:We should still lynch this imo. Yes, he towntold when the hammer was over his head. Everyone does.
In post 3430, Nahdia wrote:You're vote is on PK btw SirCakez... Xkfyu is still at L-1. Not that I'm saying you should hammer him right now, but the thread isn't about to lock.
In post 3426, SirCakez wrote:In post 3424, Xkfyu wrote:SirCakez, Sensei, and pisskop are my top 3. The other two were just after thoughts.
However, I don't think Cakez and Sensei are scum together, but I could definitely see Cakez and pisskop. If Sensei is scum, I'd say it's either with Dwlee or pisskop, but probably Dwlee.
See those first two are half of why people are scumreading you. Sensei being scum is ridiculously unlikely.
In post 3428, Nahdia wrote:His vote is even a "self-preservation" vote.
In post 3435, SirCakez wrote:I thought PW hammered?
In post 3439, pisskop wrote:Still rather have cakez to xk.
In post 3438, Nahdia wrote:I can respect that but you've made no statements as to who is scum as of late until now when you're sitting at L-1. You've just been slyly pointing out possibly scummy things in a few people.
In post 3437, SirCakez wrote:Because he lead wagons on Beeboy day 1 and 2, and his play in general has been very townie.
In post 3446, pisskop wrote:survivalism is a poor justification. when does my survivalism start as the counter?
what about cakrz?
In post 3447, SirCakez wrote:In post 3442, Nahdia wrote:I've gone back and fourth on SirCakez today but meh.
SirCakez who are you going to neighborize?
I'm not going to answer that wtf
Xk I do think it was a bus but busses aren't generally lead by the same person two days in a row.
In post 3448, SirCakez wrote:Inb4 PK wants me lynched because if Xk is lynched it will out him as scum
In post 3453, SirCakez wrote:PK and Nahdia makes sense as a scum team to me.
In post 3457, pisskop wrote:i dont get why bussing is where you guys go. distancing is the better play, especially when doubt crept in
In post 3460, Nahdia wrote:What if you happen to neighborize the kill target and Phoenix happens to track you?In post 3447, SirCakez wrote:In post 3442, Nahdia wrote:I've gone back and fourth on SirCakez today but meh.
SirCakez who are you going to neighborize?
I'm not going to answer that wtf
Answer it. There's 0 reason not to.
In post 3462, Nahdia wrote:Well if he visits two different people........
In post 3468, pisskop wrote:this isnt mylo but yea i forgot he did
In post 3473, Dwlee99 wrote:I am down for that plan, xkfyu.
In post 3474, Nahdia wrote:I mean, I see no harm trying. But I don't see why scum can't be Loved.
In post 3484, Nahdia wrote:Scum can be loved/hated. They're usually town but it's not universal.
In post 3487, SirCakez wrote:You can test it if you really want but scum quick hammer is a good possibility.
In post 3491, SirCakez wrote:In post 3486, Xkfyu wrote:It would at least establish whether or not he is telling the truth about being loved. If he's lynched then we've caught scum. Otherwise, people can just move right back to me.
Ew
In post 3500, Phoenix Wright wrote:In post 3492, pisskop wrote:There was a time for that, and it was not when you were wagoned.
Good point actually. Why'd you only bring this up now, Xfkyu?
In post 3503, Dwlee99 wrote:NAHDIA. STOP. ANSWERING. FOR. PEOPLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
In post 3508, Phoenix Wright wrote:Pisskop's post that I quoted made me wonder if the whole Sircakez thing was a last ditch desperate attempt to take attention off himself. If it if it was and you didn't answer for him, he might've given answer that sounded nervous or like bs. But you gave him an out.
In post 3512, Nahdia wrote:Cakez being loved doesn't confirm him as town by any means >_>
In post 3515, pisskop wrote:Did we all forget that play is the best indicator of alignment?
In post 3517, Nahdia wrote:This is almost definitely a waste of time.
In post 3517, Nahdia wrote:This is almost definitely a waste of time.
In post 3520, pisskop wrote:We arent testing passive modifiers. If we wagon on cakez Im aiming for a lynch
In post 3523, Nahdia wrote:If you guys manage to get a SirCakez wagon to 4 I'll quickly place the 5th vote and remove it, but for now my vote stays. This feels frivolous, I can't imagine anyone fakeclaiming something so easily testable.
In post 3526, pisskop wrote:Survivalism is great and all, but this is ridiculous.
In post 3528, Nahdia wrote:There's only 1 scum besides Cakez. You don't know their mindset. Maybe they're not even posting rn. Maybe they just don't want all those votes to transition to their buddy, regardless of it being a "test".
In post 3531, Nahdia wrote:No.
In post 3536, pisskop wrote:See those assumptions.
Theres no reason to. I would have let town bring it up I think. Its a safeguard if you claim it as scum, a way to say, see, look Im actually this comepletely irrelevant thing too!
In post 3537, pisskop wrote:And so what if he was? Beeboy told the truth about being a rolecop.
In post 3542, Nahdia wrote:The only person whose role claim is seriously cast into suspicion here is you, Xkfyu. Everyone else I believe their claim, though their alignment is still up in the air.