In post 423, Performer wrote:
409 - a VT Mafia??
419 – Wanderer, he mentioned a VT Mafia, which makes no sense
In post 425, SilverWolf wrote:
I honestly think grayfoxxxx believes if he claims VT, that means he's town. Like, I think he really believes that and he may actually be town for thinking like this.
In post 427, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 425, SilverWolf wrote:
I honestly think grayfoxxxx believes if he claims VT, that means he's town. Like, I think he really believes that and he may actually be town for thinking like this.
Ok sorry I have to ask.
Am I supposed to think I'm NOT town if I'm VT. I mean the role is VanillaTownie.
In post 425, SilverWolf wrote:In post 423, Performer wrote:
409 - a VT Mafia??
419 – Wanderer, he mentioned a VT Mafia, which makes no sense
I honestly think grayfoxxxx believes if he claims VT, that means he's town. Like, I think he really believes that and he may actually be town for thinking like this.
Performer-VT Mafia to me=Mafia Goon. Basically scum with no PR.
In post 426, SilverWolf wrote:You know what else I don't like?
Accountant replaced out of this game due to some RL issues but immediately joined another game and is posting regularly in that one starting 3 days after replacing out of this one.
To me, that means I can't townread CDB.
In post 431, Wanderer-nl wrote:
grok
ɡräk/
verbUSinformal
verb: grok; 3rd person present: groks; past tense: grokked; past participle: grokked; gerund or present participle: grokking
understand (something) intuitively or by empathy.
(It was a new word for me too, not hard to look it up though).
The rest of your points are such huge misrepping of how the conversation went because you seem to be accusing Grayfox of those things while he came up with none of that himself.
In post 434, Performer wrote:In post 426, SilverWolf wrote:You know what else I don't like?
Accountant replaced out of this game due to some RL issues but immediately joined another game and is posting regularly in that one starting 3 days after replacing out of this one.
To me, that means I can't townread CDB.
People leave games for all sorts of reasons. Though it's annoying to me too, on the bright side, CDB isn't inactive.
In post 431, Wanderer-nl wrote:
grok
ɡräk/
verbUSinformal
verb: grok; 3rd person present: groks; past tense: grokked; past participle: grokked; gerund or present participle: grokking
understand (something) intuitively or by empathy.
(It was a new word for me too, not hard to look it up though).
The rest of your points are such huge misrepping of how the conversation went because you seem to be accusing Grayfox of those things while he came up with none of that himself.
You don't think someone could be BP Mafia, Mafia Goon, or some other mafia role, while saying they're VT Mafia? Who on earth would even come up with that? Townies just state they're VT, not something improbable like VT Mafia.
It's funny you suddenly say I'm misrepresenting something when all of day 1, he spoke of following through with a reads list or some sort of analysis. Then on day 2 he talks his way out of doing so.
Sounds to me like you're trying to misrepresent me for genuine scumhunting.
In post 432, SilverWolf wrote:Expedience (7) - All Alone,SilverWolf, absta101, Akarin,Slandaar, ChannelDelibird,Davsto
MarioManica4 (1)-Expedience
ChannelDelibird (1) - MarioManiac4
Not Voting (4) - Wanderer-nl, Grayfoxxx, Performer
Struck out those I know are not scum.
So, while it's possible it was an all town wagon, I'm thinking it's got a scum on it.
So at least one of All Alone, absta101, Akarin, CDB are likely scum.
Off-at least one of MM4, Wanderer, Grayfoxxxx, Performer are likely scum.
Most mini's of this size have 3 scum so I'm going with that assumption as of right now.
So I'll be ISOing and meta diving some of these folks and seeing what I can find out.
In post 436, Wanderer-nl wrote:
This is a 10 vs 3 town vs mafia mod-confirmed setup. No need to assume, we are certain of this. The rest of this post is kind of duh, so I'm looking forward to what you find. By kind of duh I mean it's pretty obvious this is the case and it looks like you put in work but really you did nothing but copy the vc, crossed out the names of flips and Davsto and yourself, and then make 2 pools of the remaning players. Duh.
In post 435, Wanderer-nl wrote:
Nobody claimed to be VT mafia. Silverwolf confused VT with vanilla and thought Grayfox' claim could still mean he was mafia, while really he claimed VANILLATOWN
In post 437, SilverWolf wrote:
Second, where does it say anywhere that this is a 10 vs 3 town vs mafia mod-confirmed setup? I've never played in a mini that says what the setup is before hand. Those are open setups. This isn't. How in the hell do you know this? I read the opening posts so it isn't there. Although I did see we only have 12 players where most minis have 13. So how do you know so much? Only scum know what the town v scum set-up is because they know how many scum there are.
In post 439, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 437, SilverWolf wrote:
Second, where does it say anywhere that this is a 10 vs 3 town vs mafia mod-confirmed setup? I've never played in a mini that says what the setup is before hand. Those are open setups. This isn't. How in the hell do you know this? I read the opening posts so it isn't there. Although I did see we only have 12 players where most minis have 13. So how do you know so much? Only scum know what the town v scum set-up is because they know how many scum there are.
Oh shit I mixed that up with another game. Silverwolf, I'm sorry about that.
In post 440, SilverWolf wrote:In post 439, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 437, SilverWolf wrote:
Second, where does it say anywhere that this is a 10 vs 3 town vs mafia mod-confirmed setup? I've never played in a mini that says what the setup is before hand. Those are open setups. This isn't. How in the hell do you know this? I read the opening posts so it isn't there. Although I did see we only have 12 players where most minis have 13. So how do you know so much? Only scum know what the town v scum set-up is because they know how many scum there are.
Oh shit I mixed that up with another game. Silverwolf, I'm sorry about that.
Or you tried to fake a townslip. Is the game ongoing or can you link it? Otherwise, I'll go searching myself later today.
In post 403, SilverWolf wrote:In post 402, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 401, SilverWolf wrote:I don't think we are going to be able to get grayfoxxxx's alignment
Again it's VT
I really don't like how you did nothing D1. All this analysis incoming shit from you for days, while never delivering on it is straight up BS. You've made a lot of excuses and basically only posted to defend yourself.
I'm not talking about your role. I'm talking about your alignment.
The reason I'm not voting you straight up for this is ongoing shit I can't discuss. But I will vote for you if you have another day where you don't do shit. There's no reason, even if you are phone posting, or even if you don't know what's going on in the game, you can't give your opinions on things.
I can't stand lurkers and anti-town players. I want to lynch them in every game I play. So I expect more from you this day phase.
You've been calling GrayFox and Wanderer scummy, yet you aren't voting either of them. Why is that?In post 394, Akarin wrote:No idea what the vote count is, but Foxxxxy is my preferred lynch at the moment.
Precisely because he is the only person scum reading you... You could easily point to WIFOM and potentially get away with no suspicion.In post 413, Wanderer-nl wrote:Also, would I want to kill the one person who was scumreading me? That seems stupid, but oh well.
You wasn't voting for him so you couldn't have unvoted and stopped the hammer. I mean, you stated intent to hammer yourself, you only do that if you aren't already voting the person.But then Expedience posted a lot and scum would minimize associations sowhen I saw those posts by Expedience I was ready to unvote, only to realize the thread was locked because Davsto hammered 2 freaking minutes after Expedience's claim.
In post 434, Performer wrote:Sounds to me like you're trying to misrepresent me for genuine scumhunting.
In post 446, absta101 wrote:@WandererPrecisely because he is the only person scum reading you... You could easily point to WIFOM and potentially get away with no suspicion.In post 413, Wanderer-nl wrote:Also, would I want to kill the one person who was scumreading me? That seems stupid, but oh well.
You wasn't voting for him so you couldn't have unvoted and stopped the hammer. I mean, you stated intent to hammer yourself, you only do that if you aren't already voting the person.But then Expedience posted a lot and scum would minimize associations sowhen I saw those posts by Expedience I was ready to unvote, only to realize the thread was locked because Davsto hammered 2 freaking minutes after Expedience's claim.
Also, your reason for calling him town is weak. I don't see how Expedience posting a lot when he was L-1 is enough to turn your scum read of him into a town read. You stated intent to hammer because you were afraid Davsto wouldn't hammer. That's how strong your scum read of Expedience was.