Mini 333 Street Racing Mafia {Game Over!}

Mariyta · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:59 am

Yes. There's a reason people try to give the cop tips on who to investigate.

Plus, he listed 2 options. I gave him the one I felt would be more.... beneficial.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 11:03 am

In regard to directing a cop, it's somewhat like having a choice between an extra lynch and a one-shot vigilante. I'd rather have the lynch because there's more information being put into it, even if the scum can sway it a little.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 11:36 am

By the way, FierceDiety is Innocent.

still voting Eroto

Mariyta · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 11:51 am

So.... people we can pretty much confirm (at least in my mind)

MBF-cop
Spamwise-confirmed by Mike
FD-Confirmed by Mike
Me (Mariyta)- Mason
My mason buddy- Confirmed by me.

That's now 5 confirmeds, 4 unconfirmeds.

DGB
Channel
Dodgy
Yos

Yos or Channel are my 2 top suspects.

Dodgy · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:04 pm

Mariyta, BIG Mistake, HUGE!!!
You just outed your partner and he might not have wanted to be outed!

Mariyta · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:08 pm

Damn.

I'm an idiot.

Mariyta · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:08 pm

Damn.

I'm an idiot.

Mariyta · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:09 pm

/sigh. Clearly not a good day.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:11 pm

Eroto is a mason too huh? Heheh. Oh well. It's okay that you let it slip because now we've pretty much got 5 confirmed innocents and four unknown. Now we just lynch one at a time until we win.

Unvote, vote ChannelDeliburd

mikeburnfire · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:26 pm

Hmmn.... a thought occurs. If we have a SK instead of a Vigilante, then we're in trouble, yeah? Maybe we should have our vigilante claim. If we have no vig then this might not be so easy afterall.

Erotomachia · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:41 pm

Well, well....

Yes, I'm Mariyta's partner. Hopefully we can use that to our advantage, as mikeburnfire said, with all our confirmed innocents.

I'm tempted to vote for CD at the moment.

The vig/SK would be among the 4 unconfirmed. So if the vig claims, we would only have to worry about 3 people. So I think mikeburnfire's right that it would be beneficial.
I have no idea what would happen if there's a SK.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:47 pm

Could somebody explain why I'm getting votes?

Out of the four unconfirmed players, I'm currently more suspicious of DrippingGoofball. Those strange early posts jumping to conclusions about masons are, in my view, the scummiest behaviour out of us four. It's as good a place to start as any, so

Vote: DrippingGoofball

Dodgy · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:43 pm

Ok, I never like to reveal my role but I am the Vig.
I had only one night kill and once that kill was made I can no longer kill. I am town. It was me that bumped Coron off, hence when Day 2 started and Mariyta said

Atticus isn't a surprise. I never would've suspected Coron,

I replied with

Well Coron wasn't a suprise to me.

I killed Coron because he seemed shifty to me but mostly because through most of the game, he seemed to think I was scum, so I had to get rid of him, but his shiftiness turned out to be a good hunch in the end.
My comment about it not being a suprise that Coron was scum was was partly because I suspected him but mostly as a hint to the town that I was the vig.
So now Ive outed myself, which I hate doing but under the circumstances, It is definately in the towns interest.

Dodgy · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:44 pm

So we can now conclude that we have no SK in this game.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 12:52 am

Possibly. Or maybe you're a lying SK. We'll burn that bridge when we come to it. First we need to take out the following people

DGB
Channel
Yos

If you "vig" anybody else Dodgy, make no mistake that we will kill you next as a precaution.

Mariyta · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:35 am

ChannelDelibird wrote:Could somebody explain why I'm getting votes?

Out of the four unconfirmed players, I'm currently more suspicious of DrippingGoofball. Those strange early posts jumping to conclusions about masons are, in my view, the scummiest behaviour out of us four. It's as good a place to start as any, so
Vote: DrippingGoofball

Are they really so strange though? In street racing, people usually race with buddies. They do the same in professional racing.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:40 am

Mariyta wrote:
ChannelDelibird wrote:Could somebody explain why I'm getting votes?

Out of the four unconfirmed players, I'm currently more suspicious of DrippingGoofball. Those strange early posts jumping to conclusions about masons are, in my view, the scummiest behaviour out of us four. It's as good a place to start as any, so
Vote: DrippingGoofball
Are they really so strange though? In street racing, people usually race with buddies. They do the same in professional racing.

I know that, but she was being so premature with it that it didn't sit right at all. And she certainly didn't say that was why she was doing it.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:48 am

Well, we don't actually know mikeburnfire is sane yet, right? He could still be naieve, as all he's gotten so far is innocents.

At this point I am sure Mike's a good guy, but I'm not sure we know he sanity; in fact, I have a very specific reason to suspect there might be as high as a 50/50 chance he's naieve.

Machiavellian-Mafia · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:41 am

It's time for the 1st vote count of DOOM in this 2nd day of action:

2 - ChannelDelibird (Mariyta, mikeburnfire)
1 - DrippingGoofball (ChannelDelibird)

Not voting: Dodgy, DrippingGoofball, Yosarian2, SpamWise, FierceDeity, Erotomachia

Remember, 5 rockets are needed to kill someone!

Machiavellian-Mafia · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:51 am

Due to SpamWise's 10+ days of inactivity in this game and on the entire MafiaScum forums, I will start looking for a replacement.

Mariyta · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:16 am

Yosarian2 wrote:Well, we don't actually know mikeburnfire is sane yet, right? He could still be naieve, as all he's gotten so far is innocents.

At this point I am sure Mike's a good guy, but I'm not sure we know he sanity; in fact, I have a very specific reason to suspect there might be as high as a 50/50 chance he's naieve.

Please elaborate, because it will change strategy drastically....

Yosarian2 · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:24 am

Mariyta wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:Well, we don't actually know mikeburnfire is sane yet, right? He could still be naieve, as all he's gotten so far is innocents.

At this point I am sure Mike's a good guy, but I'm not sure we know he sanity; in fact, I have a very specific reason to suspect there might be as high as a 50/50 chance he's naieve.
Please elaborate, because it will change strategy drastically....

I'm not going to elaborate today. Just something to keep in mind.

Mariyta · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:50 am

How on earth do you expect us to make an informed decision if you refuse to tell us why you think Mike is 50/50 naive???

Unvote, Vote: Yos

because I think he's full of crap.

FierceDeity · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:53 am

Oi, name changed again. You should stop doing that.

Anyways, yeah, Mike is sane. I can 100% confirm that.

I'll post more in a little while, doctors appointmen.

Mariyta · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:39 am

If Mike is naive, it means he has to be wrong about FD AND Spamwise. I don't believe that's true. The likelihood of having 4 scum (and him hitting both right off the bat) is extremely small. So, until I have a reason to believe he's wrong, I must believe Yos is a) scum, or b) naive himself.