Hey I used that logic on gamma.In post 470, qubixes wrote:For what it's worth, I could see lane's play being long term thinking who is an easier mislynch after GL/me dies.
But I don't think it applies to lane
Hey I used that logic on gamma.In post 470, qubixes wrote:For what it's worth, I could see lane's play being long term thinking who is an easier mislynch after GL/me dies.
Great! That's going to be so helpful!In post 474, Dunnstral wrote:Consider me buddiedIn post 469, qubixes wrote:Wow.. Looks like Dunn was right after all
To me it seems the other way around with gamma. Short term, frank looks like the easier lynch with the strange argument against Howard, so I would expect a long-term thinking scum!gamma to prefer a Howard lynch. Do you disagree? (I guess it is all kind of academic if we're both getting lynched...)In post 475, Dunnstral wrote:Hey I used that logic on gamma.In post 470, qubixes wrote:For what it's worth, I could see lane's play being long term thinking who is an easier mislynch after GL/me dies.
But I don't think it applies to lane
"His case on howard isnt bad, and even though thats all hes talked about, Im going to scum read him" "oh yeah let me buddy the courage group.also im going to press howard on the points frank brought up tomorrow"In post 482, Gamma Emerald wrote:Looking back over Frank's ISO it's not his case on Howard that I have issues with. There's some shady stuff all over. Specifically throwing shade at the Courage group, which I think is all-town.
VOTE: Frank
This. My reads in each group reaffirms my read on others. So I am using a bit of circular logic in which group is all-town.In post 197, FrankJaeger wrote:I wonder what scum will do if they are the last hammer, and their buddy is on the lynch block
Can you give us your scum reads as of right now.In post 477, qubixes wrote:Great! That's going to be so helpful!In post 474, Dunnstral wrote:Consider me buddiedIn post 469, qubixes wrote:Wow.. Looks like Dunn was right after allTo me it seems the other way around with gamma. Short term, frank looks like the easier lynch with the strange argument against Howard, so I would expect a long-term thinking scum!gamma to prefer a Howard lynch. Do you disagree? (I guess it is all kind of academic if we're both getting lynched...)In post 475, Dunnstral wrote:Hey I used that logic on gamma.In post 470, qubixes wrote:For what it's worth, I could see lane's play being long term thinking who is an easier mislynch after GL/me dies.
But I don't think it applies to lane
Why do you think it doesn't apply to Lane? Btw, I read most of his ISO as rather clean, going in direction I would have (probably) tried to explore if I were in the game at that point. Maybe the quick pivot on my/GL's slot means he's more likely than not town. Anyway, I'd still lynch GL over Lane for sure at this point.
In post 476, FrankJaeger wrote:Vote staying on howard.
So whats up gamma?
Tick tock
Btw not going to scum read tomorrow you in the event im wrong.
I would understand if you scumread me (slightly).
In post 484, FrankJaeger wrote:"His case on howard isnt bad, and even though thats all hes talked about, Im going to scum read him" "oh yeah let me buddy the courage group.also im going to press howard on the points frank brought up tomorrow"In post 482, Gamma Emerald wrote:Looking back over Frank's ISO it's not his case on Howard that I have issues with. There's some shady stuff all over. Specifically throwing shade at the Courage group, which I think is all-town.
VOTE: Frank
is what scum gamma would be saying here.
But town gamma would point out the shady posts so we can talk about them.
He would also give us insight into his CAT theory (Courage All Town)
Oops. I was intending to ask how Frank progressed from the first post to the second.In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 476, FrankJaeger wrote:Vote staying on howard.
So whats up gamma?
Tick tock
Btw not going to scum read tomorrow you in the event im wrong.
I would understand if you scumread me (slightly).In post 484, FrankJaeger wrote:"His case on howard isnt bad, and even though thats all hes talked about, Im going to scum read him" "oh yeah let me buddy the courage group.also im going to press howard on the points frank brought up tomorrow"In post 482, Gamma Emerald wrote:Looking back over Frank's ISO it's not his case on Howard that I have issues with. There's some shady stuff all over. Specifically throwing shade at the Courage group, which I think is all-town.
VOTE: Frank
is what scum gamma would be saying here.
But town gamma would point out the shady posts so we can talk about them.
He would also give us insight into his CAT theory (Courage All Town)
what is "this" to you?In post 485, Gamma Emerald wrote:This. My reads in each group reaffirms my read on others. So I am using a bit of circular logic in which group is all-town.In post 197, FrankJaeger wrote:I wonder what scum will do if they are the last hammer, and their buddy is on the lynch block
What progression?In post 488, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oops. I was intending to ask how Frank progressed from the first post to the second.In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 476, FrankJaeger wrote:Vote staying on howard.
So whats up gamma?
Tick tock
Btw not going to scum read tomorrow you in the event im wrong.
I would understand if you scumread me (slightly).In post 484, FrankJaeger wrote:"His case on howard isnt bad, and even though thats all hes talked about, Im going to scum read him" "oh yeah let me buddy the courage group.also im going to press howard on the points frank brought up tomorrow"In post 482, Gamma Emerald wrote:Looking back over Frank's ISO it's not his case on Howard that I have issues with. There's some shady stuff all over. Specifically throwing shade at the Courage group, which I think is all-town.
VOTE: Frank
is what scum gamma would be saying here.
But town gamma would point out the shady posts so we can talk about them.
He would also give us insight into his CAT theory (Courage All Town)
So the fact that 80 percent of the town is fine with whats goin on is ok?In post 490, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think there is scum in Wisdom and Power (Frank and Dunn). This means Courage is all-town. The lack of conflict they seem to have feels like it comes from a group with no scum. My scum suspects have also behaved in ways that imply Courage is town.
I see you changing your read on me.In post 491, FrankJaeger wrote:What progression?In post 488, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oops. I was intending to ask how Frank progressed from the first post to the second.In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 476, FrankJaeger wrote:Vote staying on howard.
So whats up gamma?
Tick tock
Btw not going to scum read tomorrow you in the event im wrong.
I would understand if you scumread me (slightly).In post 484, FrankJaeger wrote:"His case on howard isnt bad, and even though thats all hes talked about, Im going to scum read him" "oh yeah let me buddy the courage group.also im going to press howard on the points frank brought up tomorrow"In post 482, Gamma Emerald wrote:Looking back over Frank's ISO it's not his case on Howard that I have issues with. There's some shady stuff all over. Specifically throwing shade at the Courage group, which I think is all-town.
VOTE: Frank
is what scum gamma would be saying here.
But town gamma would point out the shady posts so we can talk about them.
He would also give us insight into his CAT theory (Courage All Town)
Those posts have 2 different points
What?In post 493, Gamma Emerald wrote:I see you changing your read on me.In post 491, FrankJaeger wrote:What progression?In post 488, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oops. I was intending to ask how Frank progressed from the first post to the second.In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 476, FrankJaeger wrote:Vote staying on howard.
So whats up gamma?
Tick tock
Btw not going to scum read tomorrow you in the event im wrong.
I would understand if you scumread me (slightly).In post 484, FrankJaeger wrote:"His case on howard isnt bad, and even though thats all hes talked about, Im going to scum read him" "oh yeah let me buddy the courage group.also im going to press howard on the points frank brought up tomorrow"In post 482, Gamma Emerald wrote:Looking back over Frank's ISO it's not his case on Howard that I have issues with. There's some shady stuff all over. Specifically throwing shade at the Courage group, which I think is all-town.
VOTE: Frank
is what scum gamma would be saying here.
But town gamma would point out the shady posts so we can talk about them.
He would also give us insight into his CAT theory (Courage All Town)
Those posts have 2 different points
In the first post you hardly sr me, in the second you say what I did was scum motivated.
Can you elaborate?In post 490, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think there is scum in Wisdom and Power (Frank and Dunn). This means Courage is all-town. The lack of conflict they seem to have feels like it comes from a group with no scum. My scum suspects have also behaved in ways that imply Courage is town.
They seem to be nitpicking.In post 496, FrankJaeger wrote:Can you elaborate?In post 490, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think there is scum in Wisdom and Power (Frank and Dunn). This means Courage is all-town. The lack of conflict they seem to have feels like it comes from a group with no scum. My scum suspects have also behaved in ways that imply Courage is town.
They cant figure out who could be scum so theyre all town is what it looks like your saying.
Which post?In post 498, Gamma Emerald wrote:They seem to be nitpicking.In post 496, FrankJaeger wrote:Can you elaborate?In post 490, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think there is scum in Wisdom and Power (Frank and Dunn). This means Courage is all-town. The lack of conflict they seem to have feels like it comes from a group with no scum. My scum suspects have also behaved in ways that imply Courage is town.
They cant figure out who could be scum so theyre all town is what it looks like your saying.
Also there the fact that you threw shade in the post I quoted, and Dunn has hard-defended you while pretty much ignoring the Courage group.