Mini 1564 - Nyctapolis (~owari~)

[Shattered Viewpoint]

Have we

seriously

not lynched anyone yet?

C'mon, I got things to do.

[Tanzklaue]

Have we

seriously

not lynched anyone yet?

C'mon, I got things to do.

wanting a lynch not even 12 hours after the day started is antitown. come on, not even everyone confirmed yet.

faking a dayvig shot is just as antitown. not that it would've been less antitown if the shot wasn't fake, as you shot less than 12 hours into the day with neither consensus about who to shoot nor real evidence or potential information on the line.

FTL, it's safe to assume that there is enough information to work with to leave RVS. why put what seems to be a random vote on RB if there are much more important targets for your vote like

VOTE: Shattered Viewpoint

also Raging Bull isn't a newb. i can assure you that he knows what he is doing.

so am i.

[Tanzklaue]

do I* grammar schmammar am i right?

[Empking]

IL, I'm wavering on, but CD definitely would have known better.

Unvote,
Vote: CD

[Raging Bull]

Oh so RB this is your first game even though you signed up a few months ago, correct?

Yes.

VOTE: Number_0ne


it is omgus

Why would you think he sucks for giving you a random vote at the start of the game? And why does he suck more than everyone else who did the same thing?

VOTE: iamsteve
I am more comfortable with this vote now thanks. I'm surprise you question my vote and not anyone else. Especially blatantly posting something like omgus, you should know it was half ass vote.

Also I suppose that shot was fake shot seeing as mod posted.

And why the hell wasn't my vote counted?

[Cheery Dog]

What am I meant to have known better? If it's Believing Shattered Viewpoint, I don't think I've played with him as that account.

[pieguyn]

And why the hell wasn't my vote counted?

Missed it, sorry. The VC has been fixed to reflect this.

[InsidiousLemons]

As much as what shattered viewpoint did would have been a bad idea if he were vig, I feel like it was, in actuality, a badly set up reaction test. Who knows, there's a small chance steve might've scumclaimed, although I doubt it. I also feel like scum wouldn't draw that much attention to themselves right off the bat, but pretty much this exact thing happened tk mmea few games ago and the bastard ended up being scum who won. I'm nit saying it's likely, but it's certainly a possibility.

[Empking]

What am I meant to have known better? If it's Believing Shattered Viewpoint, I don't think I've played with him as that account.

Its believing a day two day via, especially one where the shooter voter somebody right after.

[Empking]

it believing a page two vig.

[Cheery Dog]

What am I meant to have known better? If it's Believing Shattered Viewpoint, I don't think I've played with him as that account.

Its believing a day two day via, especially one where the shooter voter somebody right after.

Doesn't stop it from being a terrible choice of who to fakekill.

[iamsteve]

As much as what shattered viewpoint did would have been a bad idea if he were vig, I feel like it was, in actuality, a badly set up reaction test. Who knows, there's a small chance steve might've scumclaimed, although I doubt it. I also feel like scum wouldn't draw that much attention to themselves right off the bat, but pretty much this exact thing happened tk mmea few games ago and the bastard ended up being scum who won. I'm nit saying it's likely, but it's certainly a possibility.

Hi again, InsidiousLemons

This is the third time you are jumping in to do the defense for someone, why? Aren't you curious how they are going to react towards the accusations themselves?

Btw: Do I come across offensive or something? Just trying to solve the game here.

[undo]

3 pages already? Am I the only one who lives in a reasonable timezone?

VOTE: iamsteve

You don't question OMGUS-RV unless you're scum trying too hard to fake scumhunt.

And

FoS: Shattered

. Pretending to be a dayvig and pushing for a lynch in page 3 is, at best, careless play. At worst, it's an "all-in" scum move. He's been around long enough to go for the latter.

[InsidiousLemons]

As much as what shattered viewpoint did would have been a bad idea if he were vig, I feel like it was, in actuality, a badly set up reaction test. Who knows, there's a small chance steve might've scumclaimed, although I doubt it. I also feel like scum wouldn't draw that much attention to themselves right off the bat, but pretty much this exact thing happened tk mmea few games ago and the bastard ended up being scum who won. I'm nit saying it's likely, but it's certainly a possibility.

Hi again, InsidiousLemons

This is the third time you are jumping in to do the defense for someone, why? Aren't you curious how they are going to react towards the accusations themselves?

Btw: Do I come across offensive or something? Just trying to solve the game here.

I suppose I am being a bit overly defensive. At the same time, I still feel, as I said, that its far from impossible for SV to be scum. Also I like your play much more now, so UNVOTE: , VOTE: Shattered Viewpoint. If my reasoning ia correct, why did you feel the need to put THAT much pressure on steve? If its incorrect, please explain your actions.

[InsidiousLemons]

^^ forgot to say, still FOS steve.

[InsidiousLemons]

^
Also I shouldn't have said I like your play a lot more, more like I liks jt enough to not be actively trying to lynch you

[Number_0ne]

wanting a lynch not even 12 hours after the day started is antitown. come on, not even everyone confirmed yet.

faking a dayvig shot is just as antitown. not that it would've been less antitown if the shot wasn't fake, as you shot less than 12 hours into the day with neither consensus about who to shoot nor real evidence or potential information on the line.

VOTE: Shattered Viewpoint

In what way are SV's actions antitown? No one actually wants a lynch 12 hours into the game, before even posting. Also, I fail to see how his fake shot is bad. It seemed more like he was hoping he shot a really stupid scum than anything else. I don't see how you could take that post seriously. No one shoots 12 hours into the first day with little information (I hope).

[notSakura]

Man, I'd love lynching evil Remilia.

YOU GUYS WONT GET PAST ME

I intend to vote them until they prove their worth

If their worth isn't proven by page 15 they must swing

[dwsnsl5]

In gonna go ahead and unvote iamsteve because his reaction to being "killed" wasn't what I would stereotype as scum. So there's that.

[dwsnsl5]

UNVOTE: iamsteve

[InsidiousLemons]

Man, I'd love lynching evil Remilia.

YOU GUYS WONT GET PAST ME

I intend to vote them until they prove their worth

If their worth isn't proven by page 15 they must swing

What is this? Why are you keeping your vote on Remilia when there are clearly more evidence-based wagons?

In gonna go ahead and unvote iamsteve because his reaction to being "killed" wasn't what I would stereotype as scum. So there's that.

Yeah, pretty much my reasoning as well.

[notSakura]

What is this? Why are you keeping your vote on Remilia when there are clearly more evidence-based wagons?

What wagons are more "evidence-based"?

[InsidiousLemons]

What is this? Why are you keeping your vote on Remilia when there are clearly more evidence-based wagons?

What wagons are more "evidence-based"?

iamsteve is slightly scummy, Viewpoint is wasting discussion time, while Remilia has done nothing anti-town that I can see thus far. Care to explain?

[notSakura]

Wait, you say that iamsteve is slightly scummy but you agreed that he wasn't doing scum-oriented reactions to being killed, and on top of that your vote is still on CD, why is that?

[notSakura]

Why is imasteve slightly scummy?

SV is always lurkaderpy and scummy (

vigthispls

)

I'm voting them because they have to make themselves obvious town to me because if they're scum they won't and if they're town that means putting this game together will be e z. I always aim to sort the people I'm familiar with and love to work with first (in this game it's p much just them)

pedit

HI SAKURA