Moospiker (2)- Jdodge, starrie
Jdodge (2)- KaHuJo, KrisReizer
KaHuJo (1)- afatchic
afatchic (1)- charter
KrisReizer (1)- Moospiker
this is exactly what we had the half a page argument about, if you wanna agree that fine, as long as you explain yourself in the process, this just looks like buddying up.starrie wrote:At this moment, but I'll read it through soon again, I'll support Jdodge.
unvote Vote:KrisReizer
Sorry! I just kind of assumed from the name... ^^; My profuse apologies.afatchic wrote:KR- please check my gender sign. lol.
That's called a defense. When someone attacks you, you're supposed to defend yourself. In a logic game, I do that by showing the flaws in the arguments that state that I am scum. I've given support for all my actions. Where's your support for this accusation?charter wrote:So... KR is grossly reacting to everything, especially comments directed at himself.
The problem with this statement is that it is only a statement. Where is the evidence? Where is the support for your argument? How can you justify a vote against me without saying any more than "is KR wrong with his arguments"?starrie wrote:Also, I just read the discussion fast, so I'll have to do my detailed version about it, but from what I've seen, is KR wrong with his arguments.
Note really accusing you, just throwing my opinion out there.KrisReizer wrote:That's called a defense. When someone attacks you, you're supposed to defend yourself. In a logic game, I do that by showing the flaws in the arguments that state that I am scum. I've given support for all my actions. Where's your support for this accusation?charter wrote:So... KR is grossly reacting to everything, especially comments directed at himself.
No. (also I just noticed that your name isn't a bunch of random letters, haha)afatchic wrote:does anyone else see a problem with my post 25 and 41? i think they fit thee situation good.
That's fine, but you should justify it if you plan on throwing it around.charter wrote:
Not really accusing you, just throwing my opinion out there.
25 was fine, but 41 didn't say much.afatchic wrote:does anyone else see a problem with my post 25 and 41? i think they fit thee situation good.
Halfway to being lynched? Hardly. There was one vote before mine, and a random one at that. I wanted to turn up the pressure, so I did. I explained that I was ready to unvote if a bandwagon should form, indicating that I was pressure voting, not lynch voting. This was seen as an opening by most of the players and I've spent the rest of the game breaking down the arguments against me.Avinyl wrote:
c) KrisReizers strange vote of JDodge while being ready to jump off if he would be lynched. I could understand if it was a first vote, but it was already halfways to lynch.
In conclusion,Vote Krisreizer
I believe I have done that already. Take a look at any of the arguments that I am scum. No one has offered a shred of evidence. In case anyone thinks of responding to this post asking for specific instances, I want to state that I have them all quoted in my prior posts.afatchic wrote: but you still should make an attempt to defend yourself KR.
Avinyl wrote:Unvote KrisReizer. I didn't notice starrie voted after the votecount.
afatchic, I just felt that you were trying to appear to be posting, but not really helping. I am not sure about it.
Avinyl wrote:c) KrisReizers strange vote of JDodge while being ready to jump off if he would be lynched. I could understand if it was a first vote, but it was already halfways to lynch.
You've had your claims disproven by short, concise lines of logic, and you then continue to argue that they're trueKrisReizer wrote:I gave specific instances and an analysis. You've given sentences that disagree and do nothing else.JDodge wrote: Yet you don't have to give anything to support your claims?
JESUS. FUCKING. CHRIST. YOU ASK IF IT WAS THE CASE OR IF YOU WERE MISTAKEN, I SAY YOU'RE MISTAKEN, YOU CONTINUE ON AS IF I SAID YOU WEREN'T.KR wrote:All right, given that I was correct about your meaning, you have contradicted yourself. Why did you change your opinion so suddenly? And, in case you want to ask me for evidence, go ahead and look at my last post to refresh your memory.JDodge wrote:Not the case.Kris Reizer wrote:
I may have misread your statement. By 'stir the pot', I assumed you meant that you agreed about the alternative uses of voting. If this was not the case, you may say so, and I'll happily drop this particular line.
So... how exactly does stopping aKR wrote:Don't take me out of context. I said that misdirection must be used if a non-scum player is to be lynched because they are not scum and will behave as such. Therefore, only scum benefit from lying.JDodge wrote:Of course! It's notKR wrote:
Explain yourself. What could a townie lie about and benefit? Note, of course, that concealing a power role is not lying. It's keeping information secret. If the target of an attack is scum, than logic will support that conclusion. If the target is town, some amount of misdirection must be used to make the target appear scummy.lying, it's justnot being entirely truthful. And did you just say you'd misdirect the town to make anyone you think scum appear scummy?
The only evidence that exists is what exists in the mod's posts. Show me where in the mod's posts that it says "X is scum" or "Y is town" or what have you, and I'll give you that.KR wrote:How? Opinions prove nothing; they are absolutely subjective. Evidence is what shows guilt.JDodge wrote:Opinions are important.KR wrote: Evidence, please? Your statement is an opinion.
I defended myself against bullshit claims. Don't blame me for you being a blithering nitwit.KR wrote:Don't blame me just because you can't explain yourself properly. It's a basic tactic to use a vote to put pressure on someone, just look at any game on this site. I'll agree that there are methods of pressure that don't involve a vote, but seeing how much you squirmed as soon as I made mine, I'm happy with my choice.JDodge wrote: This is the bullshit I was talking about. I said that you have to "stir the soup", which you can dojust as easily without voting, then you attribute it to voting. You're dense.
Scum can benefit just as much from discussion. It's kind of hard to steer the town when you aren't saying anything. Are you seriously new enough that you think everything isKR wrote:That's fine, but you didn't add anything to the discussion, which makes you appear scummy. Townies benefit from discussion, scum do not. That's why those who don't say much look like scum.Moospiker wrote:Thing is, I don't like the way that you jumped on me for agreeing with JDodge. If I want to state my opinion, I'll agree, disagree, or take a totally different side. I wasn't trying to appear to be posting content. I was stating my opinion, which happened to be what JDodge said.
OMGUS? doesn't help your case much.Moospiker wrote:Baseless accusation. You attack KR all through this post, and then jump to the conclusion I am bussing KR? This pisses me off.JDodge wrote:In conclusion, the scum are KR and Moospiker, who is making a really poor attempt at a bus.
Unvote
Vote: JDodge