Mafia 109 - A Glitch in time - Game Over!

Parama · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:42 pm

Ythan wrote:
Parama wrote:I don't need to sell you on a case that SHOULD speak for itself.
This is entirely contrary to, I dunno,
Mafia
.

Well, I've given reason and evidence. Don't know what more you want - just ISO them already and you should see it clear as day.

Ythan · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:43 pm

Parama, you're calling scum based on extremely flimsy evidence. Your interpretation is one of a great number of possibilities. That's not evidence, it's a theory.

Ythan · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:43 pm

Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:
Parama wrote:I don't need to sell you on a case that SHOULD speak for itself.
This is entirely contrary to, I dunno,
Mafia
.
Well, I've given reason and evidence. Don't know what more you want - just ISO them already and you should see it clear as day.

You're saying players are scummy and to look for ourselves instead of counting on you to support your own case.

Parama · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:44 pm

Fun quotes from dramonic:

dramonic wrote:It doesnt kill mines anyways. I've been using it for a few months and now I find subsilver way more painful.

Also, this wagon on Nik is sooooooo scummy.

dramonic wrote: Second, the Nik wagon: Worst... Wagon... EVER...

dramonic wrote:I still believe the wagon on Nik was craptastic, even if he flipped scum. Just an FYI.

This game is beautiful.

Parama · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:45 pm

Ythan wrote:Parama, you're calling scum based on extremely flimsy evidence. Your interpretation is one of a great number of possibilities. That's not evidence, it's a theory.

Let's just agree to disagree then. You're just going to hate how I've decided to play this game.

Ythan · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:45 pm

What you're showing is dramonic disagreeing with the case. Are you trying to argue that he was defending his buddy? That he's been inconsistent? What are you looking at here?

Ythan · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:46 pm

Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:Parama, you're calling scum based on extremely flimsy evidence. Your interpretation is one of a great number of possibilities. That's not evidence, it's a theory.
Let's just agree to disagree then. You're just going to hate how I've decided to play this game.

No I'm just going to continue to push the case that (among other things) you're not backing up your own cases.

Parama · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:46 pm

Ythan wrote:Are you trying to argue that he was defending his buddy?

Obviously.

A clergyman with a hoop · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:46 pm

Parama, are you only suspicious of people who opposed the Nikanor wagon? Why are scum more likely to take that position over bussing?

Ythan · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:47 pm

Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:Are you trying to argue that he was defending his buddy?
Obviously.

If that's true he wasn't doing a whole lot about it, was he?

Parama · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:47 pm

Ythan wrote:
Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:Parama, you're calling scum based on extremely flimsy evidence. Your interpretation is one of a great number of possibilities. That's not evidence, it's a theory.
Let's just agree to disagree then. You're just going to hate how I've decided to play this game.
No I'm just going to continue to push the case that (among other things) you're not backing up your own cases.

CSL I didn't have much to back up with.
Clergy I have given plenty of reason and plenty of evidence.
Stop spamming.

Parama · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:48 pm

A clergyman with a hoop wrote:Parama, are you only suspicious of people who opposed the Nikanor wagon? Why are scum more likely to take that position over bussing?

Actually I'm looking for likely scum. You and dram have expressed your discontent over the Nikanor wagon/lynch (even after the scumflip) while forgetting to give reasons why he wasn't scum.

Ythan · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:48 pm

Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:
Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:Parama, you're calling scum based on extremely flimsy evidence. Your interpretation is one of a great number of possibilities. That's not evidence, it's a theory.
Let's just agree to disagree then. You're just going to hate how I've decided to play this game.
No I'm just going to continue to push the case that (among other things) you're not backing up your own cases.
CSL I didn't have much to back up with.
Clergy I have given plenty of reason and plenty of evidence.
Stop spamming.

I'm not spamming here, but I'm interested in the fact that you took that route. And, you have

not

given

plenty

of evidence on Clergy, that I can see.

Parama · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:49 pm

I disagree with your opinion on my clergy case. That is all.

Parama · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:50 pm

Ythan, here's a better question: Do you think clergyhoop is scum? If so, why? If not, why not?

Ythan · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:50 pm

You don't have to back it up, you're perfectly free to just call it a day. But that's no way to get a wagon going on your suspect.

Ythan · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:51 pm

Parama wrote:Ythan, here's a better question: Do you think clergyhoop is scum? If so, why? If not, why not?

Better than what other question? Anyway he's not on my list but he's not discounted. Right now my serious suspicions are on yourself and Mab.

A clergyman with a hoop · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:55 pm

Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:
Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:Parama, you're calling scum based on extremely flimsy evidence. Your interpretation is one of a great number of possibilities. That's not evidence, it's a theory.
Let's just agree to disagree then. You're just going to hate how I've decided to play this game.
No I'm just going to continue to push the case that (among other things) you're not backing up your own cases.
CSL I didn't have much to back up with.
Clergy I have given plenty of reason and plenty of evidence.
Stop spamming.

I hope that wasn't directed at me, because you know....

Hoopla posts in the last 24 hours: 7
Parama posts in the last 24 hours: 26

~~

I'm not going to 'spam' if you give legitimate reasons. A theory based on me opposing a wagon is just a theory if you can't offer reasons why this is more likely for me to do as scum. You have a very shallow circle of logic that seems to be based on minimal thinking. Also, your case about me bussing buddies doesn't fly - it's essentially an assumption based upon an assumption, which omits multitudes of possibilities. Point to some evidence, rather than just saying there is lots of it.

Ythan · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:57 pm

I think it was directed at me. Because of the quote tags.

Parama · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:59 pm

A clergyman with a hoop wrote:
Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:
Parama wrote:
Ythan wrote:Parama, you're calling scum based on extremely flimsy evidence. Your interpretation is one of a great number of possibilities. That's not evidence, it's a theory.
Let's just agree to disagree then. You're just going to hate how I've decided to play this game.
No I'm just going to continue to push the case that (among other things) you're not backing up your own cases.
CSL I didn't have much to back up with.
Clergy I have given plenty of reason and plenty of evidence.
Stop spamming.
I hope that wasn't directed at me, because you know....

Hoopla posts in the last 24 hours: 7
Parama posts in the last 24 hours: 26

~~

I'm not going to 'spam' if you give legitimate reasons. A theory based on me opposing a wagon is just a theory if you can't offer reasons why this is more likely for me to do as scum. You have a very shallow circle of logic that seems to be based on minimal thinking. Also, your case about me bussing buddies doesn't fly - it's essentially an assumption based upon an assumption, which omits multitudes of possibilities. Point to some evidence, rather than just saying there is lots of it.

Yeah it was at Ythan, sorry for wasting your time.
If you want me to build a wall-of-text case on Clergy I can do it and I probably will do it tomorrow (tonight I need to be studying for 2 tests I have tomorrow and don't have time time to build a wall.) But I assure you there's enough for me to go on for a full-fledged case. I'm just too lazy to do it.

Ythan · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:02 pm

Parama wrote:But I assure you there's enough for me to go on for a full-fledged case. I'm just too lazy to do it.

Are you serious. If Parama survives the day can a vig please take care of this.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:21 pm

Weaboo wrote:Kise won't be on till later so I can't discuss my thoughts with him before I post. I will say that we really really really really want an Ythan lynch, and would be totally okay with a Parama lynch as well. We were shocked Nik flipped scum, but that wagon was really weak and a matter of luck.

:eyebrow:

what makes you think the wagon on Nik was weak or "a matter of luck"? I thought he was pretty consistantly scummy on day 1.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:22 pm

SpyreX wrote: Considering the italics - care to comment on Dramonic or the less than 10 posts squad?

Yeah, I agree with you that we can't let people lurk.

Who else is lurking right now?

Yosarian2 · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:31 pm

And, I'm caught up. Man, that last 4 pages is pretty much the least informative 4 pages ever.

Ythan, you posted like 5 billion times without really saying anything. It's kind of frustrating.

Ythan wrote:
Parama wrote:But I assure you there's enough for me to go on for a full-fledged case. I'm just too lazy to do it.
Are you serious. If Parama survives the day can a vig please take care of this.

Are you seriously attacking Para for saying "let's lynch clergy" without making a case, when you've been doing the exact same thing for the past 4 pages to the new replacement?

Seriously, people. Don't spam and say "let's lynch X" 500 times, it's just annoying. Take the same time you're all wasting on spam and and make an acutal case, with quotes and arguments for why those quotes are scummy and such.

dramonic · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:33 pm

Parama wrote:
A clergyman with a hoop wrote:Parama, are you only suspicious of people who opposed the Nikanor wagon? Why are scum more likely to take that position over bussing?
Actually I'm looking for likely scum. You and dram have expressed your discontent over the Nikanor wagon/lynch (even after the scumflip) while forgetting to give reasons why he wasn't scum.

I dont have a really big ISO, I gave reason why I didn't think Nik was scum. Look a bit before throwing stuff randomly?