In post 646, Shaft wrote:Gammagooey wrote:eh
that's not completely awful i guess
do you have a read on esp or toon fighter?
both crackers...
can you translate that?
In post 646, Shaft wrote:Gammagooey wrote:eh
that's not completely awful i guess
do you have a read on esp or toon fighter?
both crackers...
In post 630, xRECKONERx wrote:NO
but regardless, I still think you have to analyze the claim not from a "what makes sense in the setup perspective", but from a motivation perspective
the timeline of the claim is weird.
In post 654, Reina wrote:In post 630, xRECKONERx wrote:NO
but regardless, I still think you have to analyze the claim not from a "what makes sense in the setup perspective", but from a motivation perspective
the timeline of the claim is weird.
the fact that he said he needed to claim eventually in his first post gets him a town-point, I feel like he's a little less likely to immediately go all-in on that plan as scum
also reck can we pressure some lurkers and then go back to voting shaft when he inevitably doesn't do anything useful? I don't want to just stall out with everyone doing their own thing and then scramble for a lynch later.
In post 650, Toon Fighter wrote:In post 646, Shaft wrote:Gammagooey wrote:eh
that's not completely awful i guess
do you have a read on esp or toon fighter?
both crackers...
can you translate that?
In post 654, Reina wrote:also reck can we pressure some lurkers and then go back to voting shaft when he inevitably doesn't do anything useful?
In post 657, Shaft wrote:In post 654, Reina wrote:also reck can we pressure some lurkers and then go back to voting shaft when he inevitably doesn't do anything useful?
who else isn't being useful that you can vote for?
In post 653, tn5421 wrote:Im pretty sure you shouldn't just assume someone is being racist like that.