Callandor wrote:What do you think of her first post? That was the one I found scummy.
How many scum do you think are likely to be in the group though? I mean, what are the chances the mafia are going to pile on straight away for an easy lynch on a townie? It's an objection that in theory might happen, but never will in practise.
This could have been explained by "gut"
if not for
Callandor wrote:Maybe I'll explain later.
Implying that you have a reason beyond Gut that requires explanation.
Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
13 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you,
Callandor wrote:Well okay, it's a reason, technically, but they're almost interchangable.
You never said it was gut.
And if it was "gut", you could have said it. You wouldn't be so evasive in answering our questions.
THEREFOR,
If you are town, Gut cannot be your reason! There must be a more complicated answer, otherwise you would not hold back your answer!
Red Truth.
It's hilarious that you managed to botch the red truth here, since it's a naive thing to say and quite factually incorrect.
I never said it wasn't gut. I never explained it all. I could have said it of course, but maybe I chose not to? I don't see how me having a reason makes me MORE likely to be evasive, it looks like TMN actually thinks the opposite.
Callandor wrote:Yet you're vote is on town. Funny.
You're not town. Not even close.
OH, OKAY. That's convincing. Except everything you've said so far this game has been terrible. You'd probably be doing a slightly better job as scum so far though, since it wouldn't be particularly hard.
totallynotmafia wrote:No, I completely agree that if you were town, and your reason for suspecting Plum was "gut", you wouldn't have said "I'll explain later".
Unless of course you're a jester, in which case gg.
Callandor wrote:Yet you're vote is on town. Funny.
You're not town. Not even close.
OH, OKAY. That's convincing. Except everything you've said so far this game has been terrible. You'd probably be doing a slightly better job as scum so far though, since it wouldn't be particularly hard.
You're scum because of:
1) The resistance to getting rid of the time skip.
2) Refusal to answer TNM's question
3) Your reaction to my pressure
4) Your attempt to deflect my pressure, instead of answering it.
5) Trying to pass off your "reasons" as "gut" when I said that WOULD be acceptable, but not in your case. (I.E: Much too convenient)
6) When faced with an argument you couldn't fight your way out of, you resorted to discrediting me.
Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
13 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you,
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
1) The resistance to getting rid of the time skip.
2) Refusal to answer TNM's question
3) Your reaction to my pressure
4) Your attempt to deflect my pressure, instead of answering it.
5) Trying to pass off your "reasons" as "gut" when I said that WOULD be acceptable, but not in your case. (I.E: Much too convenient)
6) When faced with an argument you couldn't fight your way out of, you resorted to discrediting me.
What other thing do I have coming???? Oh my god I fucking *love* surprises.
See the thing about your case is, it's objectively terrible. 1) wasn't a scumtell untill you made a case, which quite clearly shows your confirmation bias. 2) is newbie game level stuff, actually 2/3/4/5 are all the same thing pretty much but your random.org of case making must have told you to make 6 points. The actualy 6 point is factually incorrect since I called you dumb 2 pages ago.
I'm glad we had this discussion, because I've been entertained as fuck.