In post 71, ZombieZApoco wrote:For all of your information, I am still here, I just don't have much to contribute to the disscusion and I would prefer not to get in an argument/people get think I am scum.
It always seem to me that most of the time, those two people who fight the entire time are both town, and the mafia are just letting them kill themselves.
Workdawg seems town to me, but that is my humble and probably not very relevant opinion.
yea.
Just a quick question, do you guys plan on lynching today or are we going to no lynch?
i don't really mind.
thats all from me...
...for now
Town wants to lynch like 90% of the time. There is such a condition where if the town mislynches, they lose, but that is fairly rare.
Also, "not wanting to seem like scum" is not something you should be concerned with. If you are truly town, your actions will show that.
Hmmmmm if peoples rvs votes have turned serious they should say so.
I find it weird that drixx didn't vote for me. That might just be a playstyle thing. He did say he was a logical player or whatever I'm not entirely sure what that means tbh. I would have voted me for pressure and to see how I responded it was like a perfect opportunity to attempt to sort me out or actually sort me out. Although jumping on my wagon might have some serious health risks considering that either 1.) I will be dismissed as a bad player or more commonly 2.) there will be an assumption that scum was on my wagon. Drixx did say he was holidaying it up.
@zombie why aren't you voting anyone?
@archon I do think it was a good enough reason to vote you. And as I have yet to decide if someone is scummier I am keeping it there.
@njac hi friend how are you?
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
In post 76, hi im Yakko wrote:Hmmmmm if peoples rvs votes have turned serious they should say so.
Workdawg already said his was serious, and mine wasn't Rvs which should have been obvious given I already Rvs'd and asked another player their thoughts on you. Why act like you didn't know this? Your reading comprehension can't be that bad
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
In post 76, hi im Yakko wrote:@archon I do think it was a good enough reason to vote you. And as I have yet to decide if someone is scummier I am keeping it there.
Why? That's a terrible reason to vote somebody
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
In post 76, hi im Yakko wrote:Hmmmmm if peoples rvs votes have turned serious they should say so.
Workdawg already said his was serious, and mine wasn't Rvs which should have been obvious given I already Rvs'd and asked another player their thoughts on you. Why act like you didn't know this? Your reading comprehension can't be that bad
Surely you see three people on my wagon and not just two smh.
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
In post 76, hi im Yakko wrote:@archon I do think it was a good enough reason to vote you. And as I have yet to decide if someone is scummier I am keeping it there.
Why? That's a terrible reason to vote somebody
Jaja. What is a terrible reason to vote someone?
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
Your attempt to play dumb isn't making me change my read on you. The reason you originally gave, the one you reference to in post 76, the one you have in post 37.
Also I don't believe for one second you were talking to just one person in that post that I quoted in post 78, so try again. Why did you make a vague statement when you were only trying to talk to one person?
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
In post 75, Workdawg wrote:Town wants to lynch like 90% of the time. There is such a condition where if the town mislynches, they lose, but that is fairly rare.
Also, "not wanting to seem like scum" is not something you should be concerned with. If you are truly town, your actions will show that.
I am quite skeptical about reads on the first day, but I agree that it seems a bit strange to say that.
"You've been furthering the win condition of the Mafia even better than the Mafia." - Dierfire
In post 76, hi im Yakko wrote:@archon I do think it was a good enough reason to vote you. And as I have yet to decide if someone is scummier I am keeping it there.
In post 53, DoTArchon wrote:If wanting to get the game started was a scumtell then RVS would never end .
So do you think wanting to end RVS is a scumtell? Town are working with no information. Asking questions is how we go about finding scum...
In post 86, Jake from State Farm wrote:Your attempt to play dumb isn't making me change my read on you. The reason you originally gave, the one you reference to in post 76, the one you have in post 37.
Okay whats your point? I am saying it is valid you are saying it is dumb.
Also I don't believe for one second you were talking to just one person in that post that I quoted in post 78, so try again. Why did you make a vague statement when you were only trying to talk to one person?
[/quote]
Hmmmmmm. If I directly ask njac it would get me my answer faster, but it wouldn't tell me anything about where he is in the game. Is he innattentive? Is he just lurking? Is he active lurking?
Jake you said my reading comprehension was bad. Yet you failed to realize how many people were on my wagon. I say you either don't care about how many (usually town) or are being oppurtunistic for town cred in jumping on an easy wagon. The thread is saying I am not well liked so it makes sense that I am scum in average human good guy bad guy archetype. I am admittedly playing odd. As scum it makes sense to try and lead a wagon on me.
@jake who is a town read for you?
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
I can't answer for Drixx, but I assume he didn't vote for you because that would put you at L-1.
I appreciate that you realized the reason I didn't vote for Yakko. He has pressure on him already so there's no need for me to vote him and risk an accidental hammer (or an intentional hammer that scum dress up to make seem accidental if Yakko is town).
Generally; however, it is considered poor form to answer for another player.
In this particular case the reason should have been obvious and I was still trying to figure out why Yakko even asked,
but a lot of times if you answer for another player you may be directly interfering with someone else's ongoing gambit or attempt to get a read on someone
.
Please note, the lack of IC color for part of the statement above doesn't have anything to do with whether or not I'm being honest about the part that I didn't put in IC color. That is an aside where I'm explaining my play and is not at all related to the point of etiquette I was addressing, so it doesn't warrant IC coloration. Please recall from my introduction that anything I put in this color you may rely upon to be me being completely honest, as I understand things (there are some disagreements in various areas of mafia theory where it's not quite possible to be objectively "honest", per se).
Hiding in Plain Sight. It's something I have been using for years but it never really catches on. It's basically a description for when scum play exceptionally bold and try to supplant the town leader position in the game. Scum who can successfully run the game are generally very skilled and are essentially "Hiding in Plain Sight".
I didn't fail to realize how many were on your wagon, I knew exactly how many was on your wagon. Read post 78 again and it's obvious I knew how many were voting for you. You pretending to not be able to have decent reading abilities is getting old already. The fact you can sit there and say I didn't realize how many were voting you when my post came right after a VC is so laughably wrong.
I don't have any town reads arm, just a single scum read but it's early.
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
In post 96, Jake from State Farm wrote:I didn't fail to realize how many were on your wagon, I knew exactly how many was on your wagon. Read post 78 again and it's obvious I knew how many were voting for you. You pretending to not be able to have decent reading abilities is getting old already. The fact you can sit there and say I didn't realize how many were voting you when my post came right after a VC is so laughably wrong.
I don't have any town reads arm, just a single scum read but it's early.
Are you a wizard? It seems like you want to appear to know everything. I am gonna go on that assumption then.
If you knew who was voting me and for what reasons then clearly my vague statement couldn't be vague at all regarding who has rvs votes on me. To you it should seem to be clearly directed at one person njac. So your statement of reading comprehension should not exist and you should have been more direct going straight for the money shot of why I was being vague about it. Why did you want to make me look bad? I do not see the town motivation behind post 78 as you have already stated that 1.) you were keenly aware of who was voting me 2.) knew the reasons but left out someone who was voting me njac. And you do this sort of post again.
Hmmmmmmmmm nvm. I'm gonna think about this.
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
Again your attempts to play dumb fail again. I knew who was voting you and why. I think you also knew who was voting you and why. I also think you knew 2 of those votes weren't RVS, so when I asked you
Thats me trying to find out why you are playing dumb on purpose. You still haven't answered the question and you keep dodging it. It's not for the reason you originally said which was
In post 85, hi im Yakko wrote:Because I don't want to ask him directly. He is lurking. I wanna see what he does.
Which is obviously bullshit.
So let's try this again shall we? Why did you pretend you didn't know that you had 2 serious votes on you?
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
