In post 694, Oil Tycoons wrote:Wisdom, I know the "orz" thing happened, but I think our Luna altguess might be wrong :/
it's not just the orz thing
In post 694, Oil Tycoons wrote:Wisdom, I know the "orz" thing happened, but I think our Luna altguess might be wrong :/
In post 748, Wisdom wrote:you can't meta me, just stop trying.
In post 741, Kuroko Network wrote:
In post 509, Aj The Epic wrote:The reason expressed is that you think he tried to slip a vote onto the largest wagon and made a mistake, or that he simply didn't give enough reason? Because he votes page 16, near top (which would've been on page 16 if the bullshit by zelink2 wasn't posted). Page topped on 15 is a vote count clearly showing Fluff to have the highest vote count.
vote:kurokoNetwork
Both. I was the main topic of discussion, being which, he slips a votewhilegiving not enough reason.
Your vote is stinky enough that I suspect that you're Wisdom's partner. I noticed Wall of Fire's naked vote, but naked votes are more null for me -- I consider it a scumtell when a player slips a vote with preamble that does not logically lead to a vote. Why did you ask that question, with the intent to clarify, while sleazily slipping a vote without justification. Specifically, why did you place a vote with a reason that is actually not a reason?
In post 396, Kuroko Network wrote:For the record, I'm scumreading him. I dislike how his reads are lacking in reasoning,specifically his scumread on my slot which appears to be slipping a vote on the player of the day, while not providing an inkling of a scumread or any indication of his thought process.
In post 517, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:idiocy is at the end of the list. whereas the rest of names show up in the opening post player list order.
In post 532, Fluff Central wrote:Have you guys realized I'm a special town snowflake yet?
In post 538, Konowa wrote:unvote;
Guy quoting every post is town. Ffery's given post restrictions in the past and I don't think she's that evil to give this restriction to scum.
Will post properly when I get home.
In post 573, Kuroko Network wrote:Outside of his "looks town" reads, Anen's reads list looks incredibly safe; I'd like to see him elaborate more on his scum reads/leans when he gets back.
In post 586, Kuroko Network wrote:I don't like the way Cephrir is handling this, and his above post is no exception. It's not scum hunting, it's him seeing votes on us and thinking he can go along with it while hoping no one realizes his push doesn't hold water. 477 is nothing but semantic nonsense (it's fairly obvious Echo's point is that Wisdom does have reasoning behind the read on us, just that it's incredibly poor). The post where he voted us (Echo's 421) is actually a fairly concise explanation of what is wrong with Wisdom's play here, followed by more semantic nonsense (Echo wasn't even suggesting a policy lynch in that post).
I don't mind AJ's vote as much.
In post 638, Muki wrote:In post 635, Wisdom wrote:What about that is strawmanning? He literally asked me why I posted a townread, what am I supposed to say to that?
The way I understood it, Idiocy was asking you to expand on your town-read of Tammy. The form of the question doesn't really make sense, though, I agree on that front.
In post 765, Wisdom wrote:im not being trolly?
In post 768, Wisdom wrote:why scum lean on fluffy and medea?
this post is crap I'm calling it crap because you accuse us of not responding to the questions asked when neither of us had posted since the questions where asked.
Why is AJ scum and how can you read Bin's wishy washy crap as town?
In post 763, Wisdom wrote:There has been no push on Kuroko, or anyone else, from me, therefore arguing that my push on them is weak and different than how I push as town is bullshit, because simply, I have not pushed them.
In post 762, Aj The Epic wrote:Wait, I'm supposed to let the "Yes Wisdom meant to vote for the largest wagon but is blinder than Stevie Wonder" go? How is the pure fabricated bullshit of 'he didn't read a vote count' a legitimate belief?
In post 762, Aj The Epic wrote:And then you want to tell me a naked vote is more null to you?
In post 762, Aj The Epic wrote:But by definition, that's a naked vote. So you like select naked votes by select people. But now the fact that he didn't explain his town reads is an issue and, on the vote, it was unexplained and so also an issue. And certainly, WoF's vote on you had the prior reasons of, and I quote, ":/". There are quotes where he specifies what makes him ":/" but nothing much more than Wisdom's own vote. You're picking and choosing what you like, not by some scum tell, but by preconceived notions.
In post 764, Idiocy wrote:I'm calling it crap because you accuse us of not responding to the questions asked when neither of us had posted since the questions where asked.
In post 448, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:^why not?
In post 449, Idiocy wrote:In post 79, Oil Tycoons wrote:In post 31, Fluff Central wrote:This is a game with a fuckton of hydra, so we all need to be considerate of our postcounts. Please please please try to keep them under control, if someone's posting gets over the top out of control they need to be purged
Notscience:
1) Good luck getting us lynched because I'm sure as fuck not going to artificially deflate my post when it's fun to post and I'm in the greatest hydra on both side of the Mississippi.
2) If you're serious about changing the spam meta, the important things to cut down on are more objective than postcount. I've never understood why it is difficult to scroll past a string of 5 posts of someone having fun. In my opinion, it's the protracted arguments where people say the same thing over and over again instead of looking and comprehending another player's argument that provide damage to game state and the way you change that is by playing with extra care and consideration, not by threatening to policy lynch people who don't play the way you want them to.
-Grandpa Oil
In post 113, Oil Tycoons wrote:Cabd's playing well if scum.
I would rather talk to penguin though because penguin!!!
No offense Cabd
In post 115, Oil Tycoons wrote:In post 114, Medea the Alien wrote:Unfortunately that's not as viable
Spoiler: IRL Shit, people who don't care can skip
Tell her I hope she feels better!
Also, I'm treating you like a live snake until further notice, Cabd.
what do you think?