NY 114: Mafia vs. Werewolves (Game Over)

[Vi]

@mod: May we go ahead and start without the last person?

I'm getting kind of impatient in the way of wanting to lynch some people.

[Vi]

@mod: May we go ahead and start without the last person?

I'm getting kind of impatient in the way of wanting to lynch some people.

[vezopiraka]

Why would you do a list on day one?
You should add yourself to the list. You see that only distracts other players from you.

[Parama]

We should be lynching SSBF D1 anyways, I don't see why it's important.

[Super Smash Bros. Fan]

We should be lynching SSBF D1 anyways, I don't see why it's important.

If you quick hammer me, you run a higher risk of killing a townie. Let's run Day 1 ful or at least almost full course before deciding on the list.

[Parama]

We're lynching you Day 1 but I never said it had to happen quickly. Though if it takes too long I'll be pretty mad.

[vezopiraka]

We should be lynching SSBF D1 anyways, I don't see why it's important.

If you quick hammer me, you run a higher risk of killing a townie. Let's run Day 1 ful or at least almost full course before deciding on the list.

If your town why would you say this? You're like already dead. You can claim if you want

[vezopiraka]

We should be lynching SSBF D1 anyways, I don't see why it's important.

If you quick hammer me, you run a higher risk of killing a townie. Let's run Day 1 full or at least almost full course before deciding on the list.

If your town why would you say this? You're like already dead. You can claim if you want

[vezopiraka]

Gosh. this site is lagging a lot. Third time I double post

[LimMePls]

SSBF I have to agree with everyone else. The things you are saying seem really scummy to me.

If you quick hammer me, you run a higher risk of killing a townie.

A higher risk? o.O And who said anything about a quick hammer?

Due to all this pre-game talk, are we even gonna have an RVS?

[Parama]

We don't need an RVS. I already voted, the vote just doesn't count until the game starts.

[SGRaaize]

I don't like the whole list idea, for two reasons:

1) I don't care about your list, its good to show something suspicious someone may have said, but aside from that, its all pointless, a big list is way overkill

2) It hardly represents every other guy's thoughts, so even if it was a good idea, it would be (rightly) ignored

[Leafsnail]

Sorry, haven't been following this... didn't think we'd start pregame .

Anyway -

Super Smash Bros. Fan's list is null... I don't really agree with it, but I don't see what makes it so scummy. It seems more like something easy to bandwagon onto. With that in mind,

FomS: Parama and Chronopie

. Parama seems far more eager to lynch over that alone, but chronopie seems to be following him, which is odd.

[LimMePls]

Sorry, haven't been following this... didn't think we'd start pregame .

Anyway -

Super Smash Bros. Fan's list is null... I don't really agree with it, but I don't see what makes it so scummy. It seems more like something easy to bandwagon onto. With that in mind,

FomS: Parama and Chronopie

. Parama seems far more eager to lynch over that alone, but chronopie seems to be following him, which is odd.

I agree with your SSBF points, although I do think he is acting a bit scummy. I think those who have seized on it to the point that they are pre-game voting is a bit suspicious.

[LimMePls]

Sorry, haven't been following this... didn't think we'd start pregame .

Anyway -

Super Smash Bros. Fan's list is null... I don't really agree with it, but I don't see what makes it so scummy. It seems more like something easy to bandwagon onto. With that in mind,

FomS: Parama and Chronopie

. Parama seems far more eager to lynch over that alone, but chronopie seems to be following him, which is odd.

I agree with your SSBF points, although I do think he is acting a bit scummy. I think those who have seized on it to the point that they are pre-game voting is a bit suspicious.

[Vi]

@mod: May we go ahead and start without the last person?

I'm getting kind of impatient in the way of wanting to lynch some people.

Pleeeeeeease?

Also, RVS is lame and pointless unless the players are entertaining. Unfortunately, on this site entertaining RVSs aren't that common. >_>

[Vi]

Also and in the interest of getting my own notes in order, if I could get everyone to answer this exhaustive and highly scientific questionnaire:

*How many games have you finished, here or elsewhere? (I don't particularly need to know details here)
*Do you consider yourself an experienced player?
*Are we there yet?
*How about now?

[LimMePls]

1) Live games? Countless. Forum games? 2
2) Live? Yes. Forum? Not even close
3) No
4) Yes

[Sevis]

1. 4 on this site, another three elsewhere with highly different rules.
2. No, not at all.
3. No.
4. No.
5. No, really, no!

[MichelSableheart]

@mod: May we go ahead and start without the last person?

I don't want to start the game yet, because I want to give players with the ability to nighttalk enough time to discuss strategy. Nothing is keeping you from actually discussing the game, of course

Lowell is the only player who hasn't confirmed yet.

[Vi]

@mod: May we go ahead and start without the last person?

I don't want to start the game yet, because I want to give players with the ability to nighttalk enough time to discuss strategy. Nothing is keeping you from actually discussing the game, of course

Lowell is the only player who hasn't confirmed yet.

Their loss if they aren't punctual

Also, Lowell totally confirmed in-thread a while ago. Are you going to hold him to the letter of the law?

[MichelSableheart]

Also, Lowell totally confirmed in-thread a while ago. Are you going to hold him to the letter of the law?

I will, yes. Confirming means telling the moderator that you have read the rules, that you have read your rolepm, and that you're ready to play. I noted a specific way of confirming in the role pm to make sure that a player doesn't only say that he has read his role pm, but actually did so. By confirming in thread, Lowell has not yet shown me that he read his rolepm. I therefore don't know if he actually has met the requirements for playing.

[Leafsnail]

*How many games have you finished, here or elsewhere? (I don't particularly need to know details here)

Here, I think it's only 3. Elsewhere... I dunno, quite a lot.

*Do you consider yourself an experienced player?

Fairly.

*Are we there yet?

We get there when we get there.

*How about now?

Sure, why not.

[Midnight's Sorrow]

*How many games have you finished, here or elsewhere? (I don't particularly need to know details here)
*Do you consider yourself an experienced player?
*Are we there yet?
*How about now?

1.) I've completed one game here, and three games on another site.

2.) Considering the drama that unfolded on the other site...I think somewhat. Though I'll hold back any self-delusions until I have more games under my belt. ^^

3.)Good question. Me thinks no though.

4.)For some reason...I highly doubt it

[Timeater]

Does anyone know any men named Michel? I don't. I wish I did though.

Hey everyone, look, SSBF is the center of attention! Everyone talk about him! Everyone debate over his silly gimmick!

Quick! DO IT GODDAMIT!!

I was considering doing a gimmick for this game until I was preempted by

you know who

. I wasn't going to use any pictures, just a codebox, a list, and scumpoints. Every time I see something scummy, that person gets a scumpoint. Whoever has the most scumpoints dictates who I vote for, who I want lynched, and shows my general thoughts towards other players. Its like his list without the silly arrows. Just an example:

Code: Select all

foilist13:2
Leafsnail:1
Lowell:9
Midnight's Sorrow:3
LynchMePls:6
SSBF:4
Vi:7

And I'd just add people to the list over time when I see scummy things. Simple, really.