Mafia 121 -- Picking Simplicity Game Over

Lowell · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:26 am

unvote, vote emp

OMGUS. And BUDDYING.

Haylen · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:29 am

Vote Lowell

You got the wrong scumtell, it's Chainsaw defence you're looking for.

Unvote Vote Haylen

Cause old habits die hard.

VasudeVa · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:02 am

Vote: Lowell

Wagon on a crash course outta RVS.

Glork · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:18 am

Vote: CJMiller

SnakePlissken · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:24 am

Vote Sudo_Nym

He was the mod on my first game on here and I lost.

Haylen · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:31 am

Glork wrote:
Vote: CJMiller

Policy?

mothrax · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:36 am

/confirm

vote AGar

for being the first person alphabetically not to post outside of confirmations.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:51 am

Vote NobodySpecial

I'm not sure you all realize this, but he knows who ALL the scum are, and WON'T TELL US! He is CLEARLY an anti town force to keep this information away from us!

AGar · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:20 am

VOTE: Haylen

String her up now before she miraculously pulls out some fakeclaim again, guys.

Xine · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:23 am

Hello hello alll
Jack: what's you'e facination with eldarad?
Azazel: how many games have you played here?
I have never random voted before, but for you, darlin' I'll make an exception:
VOTE: Sudo

Glork · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:24 am

Haylen wrote:
Glork wrote:
Vote: CJMiller
Policy?

Huh? I have no fucking clue who CJ is. I just picked a name and voted.

AGar · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:29 am

Glork wrote:
Haylen wrote:
Glork wrote:
Vote: CJMiller
Policy?
Huh? I have no fucking clue who CJ is. I just picked a name and voted.

Prolly cuz ur the only 1 who didn't post a reason w/ ur vote.

Wood evry1 b pissed if I typed liek this all game long?

Jack · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:34 am

Claim:

either

doctor or cop, to get that out of the way.

With this setup they can't risk missing a kill on me so no danger in claiming...I will provide "results" or results after each day to keep it uncertain. I will also take suggestions or "suggestions".

and

Vote:Mothrax

Haylen · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:39 am

Jack, that was stupid.

AGar, keep talking like that and I will slit your throat with a rusty spoon.

LimMePls · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:43 am

Vote: Uncertain Kitty

I find uncertainty scummy, as it allows the scum to sit around without an opinion until they see what way the town is going. MAKE UP YOUR MIND!

I like Jack's claim.

Empking · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:44 am

OK, I'm pretty sure that was an awful idea plus I don't even think that it can kickstart discussion.

FOS; Jack

- Honestly I don't think I buy it (Don't think he should be today's lynch though.)

Xine · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:54 am

AGAR: I would love it if you post like that all game. Jack...WTF?

LimMePls · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:05 am

Empking wrote:OK, I'm pretty sure that was an awful idea plus I don't even think that it can kickstart discussion.

FOS; Jack
- Honestly I don't think I buy it (Don't think he should be today's lynch though.)

Do you think this makes sense as a scum gambit?

Glork · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:06 am

Jack wrote:
Claim:

either
doctor or cop, to get that out of the way.

With this setup they can't risk missing a kill on me so no danger in claiming...I will provide "results" or results after each day to keep it uncertain. I will also take suggestions or "suggestions".

and

Vote:Mothrax

You have GOT to be kidding me.

If I'm scum, it's totally worth a 50/50 shot of losing ONE nightkill to find out which you are. And if you're the Doctor, you die, and the Cop can't claim without dying after that point.

It also means that if the other among [Doctor/Cop] has to claim, then we know what both of them are, and you will both be dead within two nights.

FURTHERMORE, it means that if ANY caught scumbag claims [Doctor/Cop], you or the other person has to counter, thereby outing all of the roles anyway.

Jesus balls, Jack. I always thought of you as being a decently insightful player. But this doesn't make ANY sense from a town protown perspective. Did you think this through at all?

Empking · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:17 am

LynchMePls wrote:
Empking wrote:OK, I'm pretty sure that was an awful idea plus I don't even think that it can kickstart discussion.

FOS; Jack
- Honestly I don't think I buy it (Don't think he should be today's lynch though.)
Do you think this makes sense as a scum gambit?

Honestly, yes. It won't last him to the end of the game of course but it would make him NK-Immune for a couple of days and allow him to lead the town until one of the real power roles kicked the bucket (and even then it would get the real role to come out and die before the next day.)

Glork · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:53 am

Unvote, Vote: LynchMePls

This is a good play.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:56 am

Interesting claim. Reserving judgement on it. I disagree with Glork about lack of town intent behind it, since I think some could exist, but it's rather tricky.

I'm going to pretend it didn't happen for the time being.

Glork · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:57 am

UncertainKitten wrote:Interesting claim. Reserving judgement on it. I disagree with Glork about lack of town intent behind it, since I think some could exist, but it's rather tricky.

I'm going to pretend it didn't happen for the time being.

You should probably be voting for LMP right now.

Glork · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:58 am

PS, I think there may very well have been protown INTENT behind it (else I'd be voting Jack), but it wasn't thought through, and it was a bone-headed play.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:00 am

Should I? I disagree for the time being. I'm happy just chilling here for awhile and seeing what unfolds.

So, how are you doing Glork? Life treating you ok ^-^?

@Glork cut: Fair enough. As I said, I'm pretending it didn't happen, at least not until it matters. Which it doesn't right now. Jack might as well have claimed miller for all I care. Well, if he did that I'd be voting him since there isn't a miller in the set up, but you know what I mean.