Good vs Evil, Law vs Chaos Reboot - Game Over, Good wins

Jackal711 · Post Post #266 (isolation #0) » Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:25 am

VOTE: Foxace36

My #1 scum suspect based on a quick read of this thread.

More analysis later when I've had time for a proper read of both this thread and the archive of the old one.

Jackal711 · Post Post #463 (isolation #1) » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:32 pm

VOTE: Norman

Continually spouting nonsense, as well as having over 1/3 of the total posts in this thread which is making it hard to catch up.

Call it a policy lynch if you want, but his large number of posts seems scummy to me as it's hindering scumhunting.

Jackal711 · Post Post #630 (isolation #2) » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:55 pm

Alright, I still think he's scum anyway.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Foxace

Jackal711 · Post Post #770 (isolation #3) » Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:17 pm

Why is this idiot still alive?
VOTE: Norman

Jackal711 · Post Post #887 (isolation #4) » Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:02 pm

This game... Still trying to get caught up.

Though I still support a Foxace lynch as he's currently still my #1 suspect based on what I've read.

VOTE: Foxace

Jackal711 · Post Post #1073 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 01, 2012 2:28 am

In post 1061, Shadoweh wrote:
In post 1059, Tammy wrote:
Shadoweh - If you want a Jackal wagon, why are you voting Foxace? This doesn't make sense to me.

Besides how Foxace is prod dodging, there doesn't seem to be interest in the wagon. If this Foxace wagon dissolved right now it would be highly likely to fall on two people I am certain should not be lynched ever, nevermind Day 1.

Wagon on me would be mostly a policy lynch based on my heavy lurking in this game. Part of that was due to my focus on the game I was modding, which completed yesterday. Part of it has been that I haven't had the time to properly read the thread, including the cached files. I will do so during night and try to have reads and stuff to post at the start of day 2.

Jackal711 · Post Post #1086 (isolation #6) » Sun Apr 01, 2012 3:52 am

In post 1085, Pine wrote:With the amount of time left, there's no way we'll rally support for anyone but Foxace today. Maybe if there'd been more enthusiasm for Zdenek, but there isn't. Besides, this doubles as a policy lynch if it's wrong.

Unvote
Vote: Foxace

FWIW I do support a Zdenek lynch, but left my vote on Foxace cause he's the most likely candidate for a day 1 lynch.

Zdenek's attacks and case on Tammy (who I believe is town) over the past few days read to me as scum trying to push a mislynch on a townie that could appear scummy if things are presented in the right manner.

Jackal711 · Post Post #1087 (isolation #7) » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:01 am

Edit by Double Post:

VOTE: Zdenek

Jackal711 · Post Post #1116 (isolation #8) » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:41 am

In post 1110, Zdenek wrote:
In post 1086, Jackal711 wrote:
In post 1085, Pine wrote:With the amount of time left, there's no way we'll rally support for anyone but Foxace today. Maybe if there'd been more enthusiasm for Zdenek, but there isn't. Besides, this doubles as a policy lynch if it's wrong.

Unvote
Vote: Foxace

FWIW I do support a Zdenek lynch, but left my vote on Foxace cause he's the most likely candidate for a day 1 lynch.

Zdenek's attacks and case on Tammy (who I believe is town) over the past few days read to me as scum trying to push a mislynch on a townie that could appear scummy if things are presented in the right manner.

What about my case on Tammy do you disagree with?
Why do you think she is so obviously town, that attacking her is a scum tell.

Out of the two of you, she seems more town to me than you do. But I'm willing to consider the possibility that my read is incorrect, since I still have not yet done a complete read of this game.

With the deadline so close, I'm at the point where I'll support any wagon that seems likely to result in lynch, as in most mafia and especially a game this big it's better to have a lynch than no-lynch, even if it winds up being a town mislynch.

I'll sit and wait for now, as you appear more townie to me now based on your reaction to my post. As I've said in a post yesterday, I will attempt a full read of the thread (including the cached part from before the boards crash) during night phase and hopefully have some solid reads to post at the start of day 2.

UNVOTE:

Jackal711 · Post Post #1228 (isolation #9) » Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:15 pm

In post 1209, Tammy wrote:So based on what I think the killer profile would be in this type of game, the killers would be trying to not attract too much attention:

*snip*

3. Jackal711. His 9 posts consists of him jumping back and forth between Foxace and Norman - two extremely easy lynches. He then calls a lynch of him policy because of his heavy lurking. It wouldn't be...his jumping between two easy lynches without providing any content until someone mentioned a wagon on him is most of what he's done. He then voted Zdenek after saying his attacks on me were bad and that I looked town to him. Zdenek responded and he immediately removed his vote and said he needed to think it over. Regardless, he jumped into the Zdenek wagon just as it was picking up support - another easy lynch target. Scum read.

*snip*

This is just how I tend to play as town in larger games.. I lurk through the first couple days and get more active once the numbers dwindle a bit. And as you noted, I do vote-hop and tend to jump on any wagon that seems to have a chance of going through.

Zdenek - As I said, looked scummy to me based on his continued push to start a wagon on you. I still believe him to be prob-scum.

Norman - I voted him based mainly on the annoyance of large and numerous walls-of-text posts. It would be a policy lynch, as what I've read of the content of said posts looks town to me.

Foxace - Currently a null-read. Believed he was scum early, but that was before I'd read much of the game.

As said in a post on Saturday, I will attempt a full read of the thread + cache during night and should have more to contribute at the start of day 2.

Jackal711 · Post Post #1246 (isolation #10) » Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:49 am

VOTE: Foxace

Whether town or scum, he seems to have mostly given up, and I agree with Shadow's post 1244.

Zdenek at least seems to put effort into his posts, and even if he's scum we can get some useful information from him. We can evaluate more tomorrow if he's town or scum.

Jackal711 · Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:34 am

By my count, that is in fact a self-hammer.

Waiting on mod to confirm.

Jackal711 · Post Post #1275 (isolation #12) » Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:11 pm

VOTE: Zdenek

Jackal711 · Post Post #1283 (isolation #13) » Fri Apr 06, 2012 4:41 pm

I'd say the doc should stay quiet for now.

@Mod: V/LA until Monday. Going out of town for Easter and will not have internet access.

Jackal711 · Post Post #1509 (isolation #14) » Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:10 pm

UNVOTE:
VOTE: AV

Jackal711 · Post Post #1717 (isolation #15) » Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:02 am

In post 1716, TiphaineDeath wrote:two scum teams of three sounds like too many, and I figure host wouldn't want to unbalance it. Am I making fals assumptions?

Actually it is very likely to be 2 teams of 3, as 6 scum total would be the correct ratio for a 26-person game according to the setup design guidelines in the wiki.

Still trying to catch up, seems like there's 3 new pages every time I check the thread..

Vote will stay where it is for now.