Open 396 - Democracy Ho! (D3)

Staeg · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:14 pm

Psyche, you just posted a wallpost that was basically "I thought so, too, but maybe not!" ctrl+C+P'd about 6 times. Your theory about 2b1s doesn't stand, either: for one, this is a 7p game as opposed to the other one being 13p with 3 scum in it. The way he explained his confusion was sincere, you say? If it was a scum ploy, I'm fairly sure he would know how would he go about it.

Psyche · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:41 pm

Is that all you got out of it? Really?

Player count isn't something you require OP reading to determine.
Secondly, it's not useful to overestimate the scumteam. Their limitations are how you find them. If 2b is scum capable of making those 5 posts, then he cannot be beaten. I am vastly more willing to believe that he is town than that he is incredibly talented scum. The rest of his play evinces this.

Psyche · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:42 pm

Not that I think 2b would be a poor scum; I just think its obvious that he isn't scum at all.

And then there were 5.

Staeg · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:45 pm

Player count is indeed something that you don't notice at first, but after only 5 people have posted for over 2 days, one would check the OP.
Oh, and someone asked what welp means -- welp. It's kinda "oh. well. yeah." Fancy way of saying blegh.

Psyche · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:49 pm

In post 103, Staeg wrote:Player count is indeed something that you don't notice at first, but after only 5 people have posted for over 2 days, one would check the OP.
Oh, and someone asked what welp means -- welp. It's kinda "oh. well. yeah." Fancy way of saying blegh.

So you think it's more probable that 2b is scum executing an extremely elaborate tactic perfectly to trick us, than that he lacked the oversight to pay attention to the game's setup that he says he already assumed he knew.

Staeg · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:52 pm

Having seen this particular event? No, I'd assume he's more likely to be town. However, he's already scummy.

2birds1stone · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:54 pm

Okay, I agree with most of what Psyche said, but I do take issue with some of it.

One, as much as I'd love to be right about Om of the Nom, he looks far less scummy than Chrimi. Chrimi's posts are fluffy and irrelevant. Om's posts, while somewhat scummy, are relevant to the game at hand.

The most serious vote Chrimi has made all game was an OMGUS vote. Om's votes, while I strongly disagree with them, have had reasoning behind them.

I find Staeg relatively townie, but he's more null than anything. I'll ISO him when I get home (I'm currently at TAFE atm), but for the time being, I wouldn't consider him for a lynch.

If we mislynch today, I doubt scum are going to put themself up for lynch tomorrow (though it's not impossible). My reason for saying this is that day two LyLo is way too good an oppurtunity to pass off. I don't like the idea that our resident lurker, Prolapsed, could make it to LyLo. That idea scares me. A lot. Kamikrazy is making me nervous too, but at least he voted.

My vote stays where it is for now.

Psyche · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:57 pm

Kami's name actually made an appearance at the bottom of the page a few minutes ago...

SpyreX · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:38 pm

Official Vote Count

Players needed to lynch: 4

2birds1stone

- 2 - Kamikrazy, Staeg - (L-2)

Chrimi

- 2 - Om of the Nom, 2birds1stone - (L-2)

Om of the Nom

- 2 - Chrimi, Psyche - (L-2)

Players not voting: Prolapsed Brain

Om of the Nom · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:11 pm

In post 97, Psyche wrote:

In post 37, Om of the Nom wrote:Also I don't like how he both A) Assumes confirmed town status even when he's not, and B) Votes someone for voting a (supposedly) confirmed person, and then proceeds to vote a basically confirmed person.

EDIT: Well hey, to each his own. I'm not scum though.

Nice red herring of a defense. And you really missed 2b's indication that those posts you find scummy aren't serious. That therefore constitutes a misrep. Intentional? You tell me, Om.

Well I still think it could be serious. I don't care whether he says it is or not.

In post 46, Om of the Nom wrote:I'm honestly not sure either. It was probably one of my "silly" moments.

Unacceptable backtracking.

I'm not saying I shouldn't have posted it, I'm just mentioning that it was stupid.

In post 65, Om of the Nom wrote:@2b1s: No, Chrimi doesn't normally act like this, but the games I'm playing with him are ongoing so I can't say much. However, meta side his posts are lackluster and full of nothing. Discussion has already started happening and he has provided nothing to further it.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chrimi
Also "buddying" basically means acting in a certain way to another player to try and get them on your side.

This seems to suggest that Chrimi's passiveness is shown by meta to be a consistent trait of hers (and thus not indicative of anything about her alliance).
Bfore I comment further, could you tell me if this explanation is correct.

No, Chrimi seems to be more wordy in the other games, and more focused on the game itself.

@Staeg: You basically just did the exact same thing.

OH. HE GOT YOU THERE. But this addendum is so short and snarky as to be ineffectual. Maybe purposely ineffectual as to preempt any attack that may arise.

So does this individually make me scum?

Psyche · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:38 am

Okay, Chrimi's more scummy than Om.

Chrimi · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:03 pm

In post 109, Om of the Nom wrote:

No, Chrimi seems to be more wordy in the other games, and more focused on the game itself.

Lies.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:28 pm

In post 110, Psyche wrote:Okay, Chrimi's more scummy than Om.

So why are you still voting me?

Psyche · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:44 pm

In post 112, Om of the Nom wrote:
In post 110, Psyche wrote:Okay, Chrimi's more scummy than Om.

So why are you still voting me?

Cuz I can. Umad?

Om of the Nom · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:48 pm

Well in case you haven't noticed, Chrimi is the only other person on my wagon. Why are you on a wagon with your scumread?

Psyche · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:01 pm

In post 113, Psyche wrote:

Cuz I can. Umad?

^
Someone's dodging questions.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:12 pm

Om of the Nom · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:13 pm

Besides how was I even supposed to know that was a serious question and not you trying to troll me?

Staeg · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:21 pm

In post 117, Om of the Nom wrote:Besides how was I even supposed to know that was a serious question and not you trying to troll me?

It's fairly obvious that he WAS trolling you and still is trolling you.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:33 pm

My point exactly.

2birds1stone · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:40 pm

Uh...

Psyche, is there any reason to your actions here?

inb4 "my little brother was on my accont"

Psyche · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:54 pm

Not really. I just forgot that I had a vote to change and then decided to use the irregularity to do some reaction fishing. :3

unvote; vote Chrimi

DO SOMETHING, MAN. TERSE REPLIES WILL GET YOU NOWHERE.

Tell us what you think of the game! Who's scummy, who's townie, and why?

Chrimi · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:00 am

I can't get much with your trolling fogging everything up.

Psyche · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 3:54 pm

Is that really all you've got? And all you have for an excuse?

2birds1stone · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:10 pm

In post 122, Chrimi wrote:I can't get much with your trolling fogging everything up.

Congratulations, you have just made the scummiest post of the entire game.

The fact that he hasn't been bussed makes me suspect scum is on his wagon.