New York 152 Niiightless Game Over!

[inte]

The actual vote means less than what happens because of the votes
If y'all think about it, it makes sense
Say, why are you being so defensive for him?

Pedit: lol

[Ythan]

Vote Count

4 redFF (BBmolla, Vifam, Hiraki, Matias) L-5
1 Vifam (redFF)
1 crypto (Pine)
1 Hiraki (inte)
1 inte (crypto)
0 BBmolla
0 BK201
0 Blonde Doctor
0 Major Minor
0 Matias
0 mb53
0 Mogri
0 Nobody Special
0 noraaa
0 Pine
0 VitorMachado

8 Not Voting (BK201, Blonde Doctor, Major Minor, mb53, Mogri, Nobody Special, noraaa, VitorMachado)

9 to lynch
Deadline May 10th

[noraaa]

Me? I'm not on anyone's side but the truth.


(cue law and order theme song)

[crypto]

Wow, Inte is incredibly annoying.

[inte]

Wow, Inte is incredibly annoying.

?

[Blonde Doctor]

I just don't like Vifam. It's a policy lynch. I'm here to bust this game wide open, reactions like BBmolla's are exactly what I'm looking for.

And what exactly did you find?

Policy Lynch Vote: crypto

Yarly

I want to vote you for this but it would be really hypocritical so I'll give you a little more time before I throw down.

What would be hypocritical about it...

red, what if Vifam is a really important town role? Would you still want him to die on policy?


ps make me write my paper

I feel as though that would be well known before he was actually lynched. This looks like you are trying to look townie by "saving" him from a lynch so early. Do you feel as though there would be nothing to learn from a wagon?

Nora, STOP! Freeze right there. Please, DON'T (!!!) make worthless filler posts consisting of non-contributive insane scum hunting on page 1, day 1, in a nightless setup. No more posts, Nora! DON'T think you can post again until page 10 and get away with it.

Vifam, you're one hell of a guy.

The irony. What were you trying to get at in the first quote?

Preview edit: Fucking ridiculous early D1 statements.

The reasons write themselves

Bolded is scummy. You do not simply tell people "if you cannot see why he is scummy, I should not have to be the one to tell you." This is a prime example of fluff. Can you explain WHAT statements a "f-ing ridiculous"?

[Matias]

I wrote it the post right after, chief

[crypto]

The irony. What were you trying to get at in the first quote?

The irony. Yes. The irony was contained exclusively by the first post.

[crypto]

Wow, Inte is incredibly annoying.

?

Aw. I take it back. He's kind of cute.

UNVOTE: inte

[noraaa]

elliot-

1. hypocritical to vote someone that is policy lynching for their policy lynch I mean it's kind of...spells itself out.

2. I'm not trying to look anything, nor am I trying to save anyone from any lynch. I was examining red's position. And yes, I figure it would be known before he died, and I wondered if he'd still want him dead regardless of his role.

3. jokes, dude.

4. goodposting

[noraaa]

to elaborate on one, if I voted him for that I'd be doing much the same thing.

[noraaa]

Oh fair warning I might likely be gone all weekend at a festival. I'll say so if I go!

[Blonde Doctor]

In fact, he even took the "important town role" thing to heart too, lol

Oh so that wasn't RNG

Page 4, no shame

In which post are you actually explaining these "obvious reasons" you avoid explaining the first time...chief.

I see in the first of three examples, you posted ONE example...which does not back up these "plural statements" you have yet to actually point out. You do not even explain what about the "important town role" statement you feel is so "ridiculous."

All I ask is for you to provide examples to back up your statement and you respond with empty, sarcastic rhetoric.

vote: Matias

[crypto]

So basically your theory is that Matias is mafia, really stupid mafia, like dumb enough to have lied to you about something really simple five pages into the game . . . and this furthers his sinister mafia agenda how?

[Matias]

policy lynch that isn't really pushed, yeah okay. That's not stubbornness, that's panning to everyone

I'm not sure on red's scum game including taking D1 statements too seriously but calling noraaa's post is as serious as they come.

I knew I posted this somewhere and that I wasn't crazy and I told you it was the post after

well I was wrong, it was the

same fucking post

Unvote, Vote: Blonde Doctor

because you're reaching.

[Matias]

It's like you read my post and went "oh, he said that the reasons write themselves. Time to capitalize!" and just stopped reading the post

This is the worst blatant misrep I've seen in a long while

[Pine]

Blonde Doctor: Are you an alt?

[BBmolla]

Pine is probably scum by the way.

[BK201]

sup.
VOTE: noraaa
seems like she has the urge to post for the sake of posting.

[redFF]

I'm gonna go ahead and say this game is mountainous.

[inte]

unfortunately hiraki responded the same way he did in the other game i played with him, and i had a town read on him most of the game

apparently crypto is a corp and has an innocent of vifam

anyways UNVOTE: hiraki

[noraaa]

sup.
VOTE: noraaa
seems like she has the urge to post for the sake of posting.

You haven't found any potential benefit from any of the things I've said in this thread?

Also V/LA until sunday.

I won't have internet access at the beach!

[noraaa]

I will admit that we may have been pretty conversational the first night but it's not something that bothers me.

I stand by my game posts as being potentially useful, depending on the replies and such.

[Hiraki]

It's like you read my post and went "oh, he said that the reasons write themselves. Time to capitalize!" and just stopped reading the post

This is the worst blatant misrep I've seen in a long while

Um.

It could be a mistake.

I find the vote very hostile, to be quite honest.

sup.
VOTE: noraaa
seems like she has the urge to post for the sake of posting.

And this is scummy...because?

[Blonde Doctor]

policy lynch that isn't really pushed, yeah okay. That's not stubbornness, that's panning to everyone

I'm not sure on red's scum game including taking D1 statements too seriously but calling noraaa's post is as serious as they come.

I knew I posted this somewhere and that I wasn't crazy and I told you it was the post after

well I was wrong, it was the

same fucking post

Unvote, Vote: Blonde Doctor

because you're reaching.

Your first comment was effectively "if you missed it, too bad so sad, you will never know!" I still do not understand what posts you are actually talking about, and would have graciously accepted being pointed in the right direction when I asked politely the first time. Furthermore, you claim it is OBVIOUS, but continue to not explain it. You throw out some whimsical comment about how he is "too serious" but have still failed to offer up an explanation of HOW after two requests now. The only response is pointing to a quote which does not adequately answer the questions I have asked, only to be followed up by a vote for...not understanding what was so obvious?

What did he call Noraaa's post?

What was scummy about it?

Why are you still insisting that we see the scummy part of it ourselves instead of offering your own interpretation?

I am sorry, but you seem more and more desperate as you post...

So basically your theory is that Matias is mafia, really stupid mafia, like dumb enough

to have lied to you about something really simple five pages into the game

. . . and this furthers his sinister mafia agenda how?

That was quite the interpretation of my post, I must say.

If you throw enough vague statements out there, one is bound to catch on and cause people to see things that are not there.

Tell me, what did YOU find scummy about redFF...or are you also choosing to throw vague accusations out there and hope that someone latches on?