In post 44, Devourer359 wrote:VOTE: Ace.Top wrote:WIFOM, pure and simple.
Explain to me how this is suspicious instead of a null tell.
I can only see a mafia having two reasons for doing what he did, to gain trust in the townies' eyes and to actually attempt to lynch someone. The first reason is basically null, as making what would most likely be interpreted as a joke vote has no effect on his innocence. While his vote can't mark him as scum, it obviously does not mark him as town.
In the case of actually attempting to lynch someone, he'll be forced to change his vote when discussion actually arrives, as more legitimate reasons for voting will appear and not doing so would be scummy. And if he lurks to get away with it, that in itself is a scumtell and an inefficient strategy due to activity rules. Besides, simply manipulating the town is much more efficient. So what does a mafia have to gain from that sort of vote?
In saying that it's WIFOM, I'm taking it with a grain of salt. But aren't you forgetting a possibility?? How about: He's calling for speed lynch because he doesn't care about who is lynched today, and maybe is fishing a bit about who he has to worry about. Tomorrow, he knows a bit more about who he wants to nominate.
Now, I could be wrong. However, especially in a game in which mafia controls every other lynch, I want to be exceptionally careful with our lynches. I don't like speed lynches anytime, and I really don't like them now. Scummy. The grain of salt isn't big enough to cancel out the scumminess that I see.
In post 44, Devourer359 wrote:Top wrote:And your assumptions are crap since I'm town.
Why do you feel the need to stick this into your post?
Because he's full of BS, and I'm town. I'm getting annoyed...
In post 44, Devourer359 wrote:Thor wrote:I'd still rather speed lynch scum than talk a lot and lynch town.
So were you serious with your vote advocating speed lynching?
I think he was dead ****ing serious. That's why I'm on him, or at least a large part of it.
In post 44, Devourer359 wrote:Top wrote:But I would view his approach of just asking it like he did and not saying much more as rather unhelpful. But that could just be me.
All I wanted was a response with your reasoning. Why would I need to say anything more?
Yeah, this was a BS feeler. Wanted to see how defensive you'd get.
In post 44, Devourer359 wrote:Top wrote:Bussing.
How would this derive any benefit for Thor? It doesn't make Thor look innocent in any way, as Ace is the obvious candidate for lynch and none of his scumminess owes any debt to Thor.
But he IS distancing early from a sinking ship.
Ace wrote:He rose to my bait so beautifully. If he was town and saw me behaving like an idiot he would have just ignored me.
Explain why a townie would ignore excessive scumtells when a jester doesn't exist.[/quote]
IDK, but he's incredibly scummy or a REALLY stupid town... Considering switching votes, but I think Thor is more dangerous.
In post 45, Thor665 wrote:In post 44, Devourer359 wrote:Thor wrote:I'd still rather speed lynch scum than talk a lot and lynch town.
So were you serious with your vote advocating speed lynching?
I dunno - I've never managed to get a speed lynch when I asked for it.
So why ask??
Rainbow, I'm well aware of Ace's summiness, and am on the verge of voting him. The only thing stopping me is what I see as Thor's scumminess and the fact that hopefully everyone already sees how scummy Ace is, and would lynch him after Thor.
To everyone not named Thor or Rainbow: Is it just me, or does it seem like Rainbow just chainsaw-defensed me??