Mini 1412: 0 Percent Flavor Mafia Finis

[Mehdi2277]

Day 1 Start

Current VC 1.1

Not Voting: ArcAngel9, The Acting Method, -L-, Slandaar, MonkeyMan576, havingfitz. Tochica. Matt-Shadowlord, The Central Scrutinizer, theaceofspades, Yates, Alduskkel, Human Destroyer

With 13 alive it will take 7 votes to Lynch.
Deadline is on January, 26th. That is in (expired on 2013-01-26 19:11:00)

[Human Destroyer]

VOTE: theaceofspades

First!

[Alduskkel]

Vote: theaceofspades

[Tochica]

Hey guys,

vote Human Destroyer

Lynch him

first

!

[The Acting Method]

VOTE: Tochica

You are a starfish, what do you have to fear from a human destroyer?

[Yates]

Vote: Slandaar

Sour grapes.

[-L-]

Hello all.

[havingfitz]

VOTE: -L- obviously.

[Human Destroyer]

VOTE: Tochica

You are a starfish, what do you have to fear from a human destroyer?

I can stretch my destructive tendencies a bit wider to adapt, so Tochica should definitely fear.

Hello all.

No RVS? Any particular reason for this?

[MonkeyMan576]

Vote: Yates

Your avatar is creepy. And I don't trust the grim reaper.

[-L-]

VOTE: Tochica

You are a starfish, what do you have to fear from a human destroyer?

I can stretch my destructive tendencies a bit wider to adapt, so Tochica should definitely fear.

Hello all.

No RVS? Any particular reason for this?

I do not play on mafiascum often, last I played it was not required. In fact - it shouldn't be.

[ArcAngel9]

VOTE: theaceofspades

First!

vote: humandestroyer

[MonkeyMan576]

@havingfitz - Isn't scumchat usually limited to either all the time or night only? If day has started I don't know how they could be "extending their chat."

[Slandaar]

VOTE: humandestroyer

This is a good wagon.

[Tochica]

Hey, Fitz, what do you mean obviously? It came more as a surprise, I fully expected your vote to follow up your thoughts from the confirmation stage.

[Human Destroyer]

VOTE: Tochica

You are a starfish, what do you have to fear from a human destroyer?

I can stretch my destructive tendencies a bit wider to adapt, so Tochica should definitely fear.

Hello all.

No RVS? Any particular reason for this?

I do not play on mafiascum often, last I played it was not required. In fact - it shouldn't be.

I never said it was; there's no need to get defensive over it.

VOTE: theaceofspades

First!

vote: humandestroyer

Sore over your lack of being first? Don't worry, you'll get plenty of chances to be first in future games.

VOTE: humandestroyer

This is a good wagon.

Any particular reason? Or do you just like RVS wagons?

Hey, Fitz, what do you mean obviously? It came more as a surprise, I fully expected your vote to follow up your thoughts from the confirmation stage.

I'd like a response to this.

[Slandaar]

I just like RVS wagons.

Good scumhunting though giving me the answer to your question.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I kind of like the aceofspades wagon as long as he's inactive. So for now, VOTE: theaceofspades

[Slandaar]

There is nothing to like about that wagon the guy hasn't posted.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

There's everything to like about lynching people who don't contribute. Active town is good town, inactive town is bad town.

[Human Destroyer]

I just like RVS wagons.

Good scumhunting though giving me the answer to your question.

I kind of like the aceofspades wagon as long as he's inactive. So for now, VOTE: theaceofspades

This vote seems to be taking an opportunity in the fact that an inactive has an RVS wagon going to vote him for a non-RVS reason. This post alone, however, doesn't make me suspicious. This does:

There's everything to like about lynching people who don't contribute. Active town is good town, inactive town is bad town.

It looks like you have a couple of things going here:

a) You know he's going to flip town by the fact you say "inactive town" and nothing about "inactive scum".

b) You mention nothing about lynching scum, only lynching inactive town over active town.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: The Central Scrutinizer

[MonkeyMan576]

Vote: Human Destroyer

I don't like that HD is attacking Central on his word semantics, but not basing his votes on the actual content of the post, which is voting lurking players.

[MonkeyMan576]

Unvote:
Vote: Human Destroyer

[Human Destroyer]

Vote: Human Destroyer

I don't like that HD is attacking Central on his word semantics, but not basing his votes on the actual content of the post, which is voting lurking players.

Except that isn't my whole case; his vote also looks opportunistic. Combined with the, as you put it, "word semantics", it's actually quite scummy.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I just like RVS wagons.

Good scumhunting though giving me the answer to your question.

I kind of like the aceofspades wagon as long as he's inactive. So for now, VOTE: theaceofspades

This vote seems to be taking an opportunity in the fact that an inactive has an RVS wagon going to vote him for a non-RVS reason. This post alone, however, doesn't make me suspicious. This does:

There's everything to like about lynching people who don't contribute. Active town is good town, inactive town is bad town.

It looks like you have a couple of things going here:

a) You know he's going to flip town by the fact you say "inactive town" and nothing about "inactive scum".

b) You mention nothing about lynching scum, only lynching inactive town over active town.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: The Central Scrutinizer

I haven't played a game on this site in a while, but several years ago it was a considered valid Day 1 strategy to lynch inactive players, because either you lynch scum or you get rid of a player that is doing nothing to help find scum.

You could easily replace "town" in those phrases with "thread" or "discussion." It has nothing whatsoever to do with town/scum in my mind. It is in the best interests of the town as a faction for all players to post actively, scum or town, because that is the primary way of generating information that results in good lynches.