We don't have to use all the time available. If anyone would've disagreed with your list, they would've spoken up by now. I think everyone's had a chance to talk.
Even if I think the list is good, we had plenty of time for people to speak up. You could've at least restated intent to hammer in 24 hours to let others have a last chance. You didn't even give that chance.
Dr said he's got a better idea so we'll hear that first. If we popcorn, I nominate Dr to go first. I don't how he was so certain Emp was going to flip town.
Emp will obviously go last.
VOTE: abasta
hammer was scummy as shit. I called emp town in like my 3 post. I loved that you immediatedly shifted the attention away from your hammer "I don't how he was so certain Emp was going to flip town." Also I loved that you glossed right off Madi - despite him not posting anything near the lynch - not even questioning him when debating.
Here's how we're going to announce results.
We go popcorn. However, if you have a guilty result, you just say you got guilty and keep quite on who you investigated. People who get guilty say their results after everyone who has got innocents finish saying their results. I'm fine with going first.
Dr is retarded. Who the fuck would vote anyone at this stage (before everyone has revealed their result) unless they're 99% sure that person is scum or unless they're scum themselves. If Dr is town, scum will just quick hammer me and win. If Dr is scum they can't yet.
@Dr
- My hammer wasn't scummy at all. It was careless at best.
Can you tell us why you were so sure Emp would flip town? It looks like you were trying to go for town cred with his flip.
I skimmed up to your 16th post. I didn't see you call him town.
Also, it's not just calling him town that makes you scummy. It's the fact that you haven't given a good reason to call him town.
P-Edit: No scum motivation?
When you call someone town who is town it makes them more likely to see you as someone they can trust. Also, IF they're lynched, you can be the one who gets town cred.
In post 417, DrDolittle wrote:^ are you insane? is no scum motivation not a convincing reason?
It wasnt convincing cause there was scum motivation.
What about when he (or yourself) didnt actually give any evidence as to why i was scummy. Just said ISO me. That is a safe way of not doing anything. Scum is usually more likely to play it safe (or try to).
Emp was far from looking the most town player we have. But you were flat out persistent that he was town.
In post 414, absta101 wrote:My hammer wasn't scummy at all. It was careless at best.
I disagree. You were the one who claimed intent to hammer and then asked about what we should do at night. It looked kinda odd that you wouldn't warn us before hammering. I'm not gonna call you scum for it. But i'm not gonna just simply let it go as "carelessness".
@Madi
Stop fucking derping around.
Pedit
absta, he was referring to Emp having no scum motivation and hence Emp was town for that reason.
In post 417, DrDolittle wrote:^ are you insane? is no scum motivation not a convincing reason?
Are you saying that Emp was strong town read because there was no scum motivation in his actions? If so, what the fuck is wrong with you? If someone just hasn't done anything scummy
they're null, not strong town!
How can you not see the scum motivation in tunnelling someone? It's easier for scum to focus their 'suspicions' on one player rather than to spread it out. They wouldn't have to make up scum reads (with reason) on more than one player.
Actually, wouldnt it be better if only the results were first given and then once they've been tallied we go and mention the targets?
I understand thats your plan for the positive results but why not just for all results?
