In post 83, YamiNoKira wrote:VOTE: Mutleyddmc
I have a feeling you're just baiting me, but I need something more from you than RVS right now. I'm not opposed to Lynch all (Active) Lurkers.
I will enforce my policy then of OMGus
VOTE: yami
In post 83, YamiNoKira wrote:VOTE: Mutleyddmc
I have a feeling you're just baiting me, but I need something more from you than RVS right now. I'm not opposed to Lynch all (Active) Lurkers.
Why would a wagon on one of your scum reads make you uncomfortable?In post 69, Skelda wrote: I didn't want a bunch of people jumping on him too fast. That makes me uncomfortable.
that is just the way mutley usually plays from my limited experience with him.In post 83, YamiNoKira wrote:VOTE: Mutleyddmc
I have a feeling you're just baiting me, but I need something more from you than RVS right now. I'm not opposed to Lynch all (Active) Lurkers.
You're going to have to identify what portion of my post you're talking about here.In post 95, Skelda wrote:Also, I definitely do not like the post about grasping at straws, simply because doesn't it help the town to keep everyone talking and try to get people to reveal themselves? How does that hurt us, bringing up little things that are likely of no significance?
Two-fold. A) It shows that he's just making himself busy. B) It shows that there is actually no reason for the RQS, since he didn't answer it.Yami wrote:What? Why are you concerned with JKLM not answering his RQS question?
But meanwhile, you've said nothing negative about JKLM at this time and were much more friendly to him than anyone else in the game. It's not a huge thing going as of now but it's notable if a flip occurs on JKLM.Yami wrote:That's not buddying. That's me jumping on a BW to see how phokdapolees reacted.
Are you telling me that you made ISO 11 and ISO 12?Yami wrote:What?
I meant Day 3 of the game starting (as in not the game day) but same difference.Yami wrote:True. (Assuming you meant Page 3.)
My vote is definitely staying here.Skelda wrote:Hopefully if JK's replacement is town he/she will prove him/herself as such, since this does not change my JK suspicion particularly.
I see, though I'm not sure that's particularly scum-motivated.In post 102, Hiraki wrote:Two-fold. A) It shows that he's just making himself busy. B) It shows that there is actually no reason for the RQS, since he didn't answer it.Yami wrote:What? Why are you concerned with JKLM not answering his RQS question?
If it's an RQS and he knows the "correct" responses, then where's his correct response? Not that it matters anymore since he's going out.
This may be true, but I would say that for the most part JKLM has only been doing IIoA and being defensive, not very helpful but also not doing anything particularly scum-motivated (with the exception of IIoA and being defensive, and we'll see with the replacement whether or not that was scum-motivated or just the way JKLM handled the pressure). My BW at that point and my treatment of JKLM are not correlated.In post 102, Hiraki wrote:But meanwhile, you've said nothing negative about JKLM at this time and were much more friendly to him than anyone else in the game. It's not a huge thing going as of now but it's notable if a flip occurs on JKLM.
...what? I'm definitely not a hydra.In post 102, Hiraki wrote:Are you telling me that you made ISO 11 and ISO 12?
So town! ... Welcome to the game.In post 105, Viera Assassin wrote:*actually posts*
Everything's been said about them by others. And I've also given an explanation. Actually, I've said that I'd give an explanation, too.In post 88, Skelda wrote:Dessew, if your random vote on me changed to a legitimate one at that wierd post, why? I had like two posts at that point.
I also dislike the eh and ellipsis on my posts, Dessew. Is that seriously all that you have to say?
What is it supposed to mean?In post 98, Skelda wrote:Hopefully if JK's replacement is town he/she will prove him/herself as such, since this does not change my JK suspicion particularly.
Just want to tell that I lol'd. "He hasn't done anything scummy, except what he has. Oh, and that's what he mainly has done."In post 106, YamiNoKira wrote: This may be true, but I would say that for the most part JKLM has only been doing IIoA and being defensive, not very helpful but also not doing anything particularly scum-motivated (with the exception of IIoA and being defensive, and we'll see with the replacement whether or not that was scum-motivated or just the way JKLM handled the pressure).
Yeah, yeah, that was horrible wording. But being scummy and having scum-motivation are two different things, and it's the latter that I'm not convinced of (despite the former being true).In post 108, Dessew wrote:Just want to tell that I lol'd. "He hasn't done anything scummy, except what he has. Oh, and that's what he mainly has done."In post 106, YamiNoKira wrote: This may be true, but I would say that for the most part JKLM has only been doing IIoA and being defensive, not very helpful but also not doing anything particularly scum-motivated (with the exception of IIoA and being defensive, and we'll see with the replacement whether or not that was scum-motivated or just the way JKLM handled the pressure).
Yeah, I got it. I absolutely agree with you.In post 109, YamiNoKira wrote:Yeah, yeah, that was horrible wording. But being scummy and having scum-motivation are two different things, and it's the latter that I'm not convinced of (despite the former being true).In post 108, Dessew wrote:Just want to tell that I lol'd. "He hasn't done anything scummy, except what he has. Oh, and that's what he mainly has done."In post 106, YamiNoKira wrote: This may be true, but I would say that for the most part JKLM has only been doing IIoA and being defensive, not very helpful but also not doing anything particularly scum-motivated (with the exception of IIoA and being defensive, and we'll see with the replacement whether or not that was scum-motivated or just the way JKLM handled the pressure).
It's definitely not town-aligned.In post 106, YamiNoKira wrote:I see, though I'm not sure that's particularly scum-motivated.
Okay...YamiNoKira wrote:...what? I'm definitely not a hydra.
You don't even think it could've made a little bit of a joke from previous experiences?Dessew wrote:Tbh, I don't understand the people who refuse to RVS, but his vote&unvote made even less sense.
In post 102, Hiraki wrote:You're going to have to identify what portion of my post you're talking about here.In post 95, Skelda wrote:Also, I definitely do not like the post about grasping at straws, simply because doesn't it help the town to keep everyone talking and try to get people to reveal themselves? How does that hurt us, bringing up little things that are likely of no significance?
This was the post was referring to.Yet, even Yami said he was over-reacting. You're reaching out for air, Skelda.In post 69, Skelda wrote:Page one or page 30, there was legitimate discussion, which you promptly ignored.
What is it supposed to mean?"/quote]In post 108, Dessew wrote:In post 98, Skelda wrote:Hopefully if JK's replacement is town he/she will prove him/herself as such, since this does not change my JK suspicion particularly.
How is that grasping at straws? Yami admitted that he was over-reacting to one post before you posted that.In post 113, Skelda wrote:This was the post was referring to.
I know, but I was bringing it up again because Dessew seemed to counter over-react. Plus, as far as I'm concerned, it is scum-motivated to ignore discussion. That is why I was so suspicious of JKLM.In post 115, Hiraki wrote:How is that grasping at straws? Yami admitted that he was over-reacting to one post before you posted that.In post 113, Skelda wrote:This was the post was referring to.
I'm not sure that's even alignment-relevant.In post 112, Hiraki wrote:It's definitely not town-aligned.In post 106, YamiNoKira wrote:I see, though I'm not sure that's particularly scum-motivated.
It's anti-town which is null or scummy at best which means it's relevant.In post 117, YamiNoKira wrote:I'm not sure that's even alignment-relevant.
Because it was page two! I don't like a lot of people jumping on someone right off the bat.In post 101, -Kubbs- wrote:Why would a wagon on one of your scum reads make you uncomfortable?In post 69, Skelda wrote: I didn't want a bunch of people jumping on him too fast. That makes me uncomfortable.
I'm going to challenge that and say it's not anti-town. It's not pro-town in the least but I don't believe that it is somehow (specifically) scum-motivated, especially early on D1.In post 118, Hiraki wrote:It's anti-town which is null or scummy at best which means it's relevant.In post 117, YamiNoKira wrote:I'm not sure that's even alignment-relevant.
In post 123, JKLM wrote:People inflect their voice in there writing differently when lying through their teeth (unless they are a skilled editor and go thrrough each post diligently).
Because you easily tell if someone is lying about liking a pet.