21 votes available
11 votes needed to lynch
V/LA: Mac (9/30), Sakura Hana (9/30)
Deadline: (expired on 2013-10-18 12:44:27)
Why? He gets better later on, but I don't get having a townread on him at this point.In post 31, kanyeknowsbest wrote:fyi matias is town.
why do you think at least 1 out of 3 of the people doing a reasonless vote are scum? acknowledging that you think 2 of them may be town implies a reasonless vote is something that both town and scum can do. is ther emore substance to it than that?In post 99, Sakura Hana wrote:I just went and ISO'd you to find your questionMy vote wasn't 100% random, i think at least 1 of you 3 is scum so i went ahead and picked one at random.In post 45, Matias wrote:Then how is a random vote any better?
very well, Sakura is townIn post 37, Sakura Hana wrote:Reasonless votes give no info, even a random reason can be analyzed.
what's so bad about letting her be pressured? such a scenario can help give new information based on how she reacts, how people pressure her, etc. especially near start of D1. but you seem to want to stop it from happening 0.0In post 72, Natirasha wrote:I'm just saying that she doesn't handle pressure well as either alignment, and typically needs someone to be a stabilizing factor.
The good news, Sakura makes her towniness very apparent.
this doesn't make any sense. at the time when you're defending her, you don't know if she's town or not = =Natirashi wrote:I qualified my statement by saying I only had her back if she was town. I never made any excuses for her or answered the questions addressed to her. Just saying that she is does have allies out there.
does this imply he does something really scummy even if he's town?Matias wrote:I don't try to read him on Day 1 any longer (and if I do, there's some massive thing that he's done that's scummy, like a slip or a terrible claim or something)
kanye wrote:why wouldnt you let her explain herself and let other people come to a conclusion on her alignment before you start promising her protection? she hasnt even had a chance to respond and youre already saying that shes gonna act frizzled and shit it just doesnt make senseo 2 me. sure if you think shes town let us know, but throwing out a carte blanche "natty gotcha back girl" is pretty ???
kanye is townkanye wrote:why do you think at least 1 out of 3 of the people doing a reasonless vote are scum? acknowledging that you think 2 of them may be town implies a reasonless vote is something that both town and scum can do. is ther emore substance to it than that?
further, are you still happy with where your vote is? has anything that has happened since literally the first 3 posts of the game affected your reads on any player in any way to a greater extent than 3 reasonless votes at the start of the game?
good god here it is againNacho wrote:I'm prepared to white knight Sakura.
Wow. So. Right.In post 101, DeasVail wrote:Why I think DrDolittle is scum:
66 strongly suggests that he has a scumread on Sakura/is pretty invested in the wagon, and that his vote in 19 was serious. What I'm wondering though is why he didn't share his reasoning for Sakura being scum. If town are making a serious vote during what is still semi-RVS, they want to show everyone how smart they are and share their reasoning! Despite the resistance to Sakura-scum, he doesn't get very involved in trying to read her or gathering support (Matias and kanye's play around Sakura appears a lot more genuine by comparison). While I do have doubts, I don't think his play is particularly unlikely to come from scum so far either so I'm pretty happy with my vote here.
This is the shittest reason for voting someone I've ever read.In post 94, waynegg wrote:no lynch is like the worst idea ever. i'd prefer a possibility of killing scum. so lets try hard to find them. but even if someone dies who isn't scum as long as its not a PR It helps town up the odds.
but even if someone dies who isn't scum as long as its not a PR It helps town up the odds.
but even if someone dies who isn't scum It helps town up the odds.
but even if someone dies who isn't scum It helps
if someone dies who isn't scum It helps
It helps
I'll say more after Dolittle next posts, but that was the best thing I could think of to attack from Page 1. If it was a random vote, then I wouldn't have considered it scummy, but if it was serious then him not saying it was serious/not providing any reasoning just makes it do nothing at all. If he had provided reasoning in his next few posts, then I would have been more ok with it, but with him obviously very much liking a Sakura vote combined with talk of white-knighting Sakura, the lack of any content behind his Sakura scumread strengthens my scumread on Dolittle.In post 109, talah wrote:Wow. So. Right.In post 101, DeasVail wrote:Why I think DrDolittle is scum:
66 strongly suggests that he has a scumread on Sakura/is pretty invested in the wagon, and that his vote in 19 was serious. What I'm wondering though is why he didn't share his reasoning for Sakura being scum. If town are making a serious vote during what is still semi-RVS, they want to show everyone how smart they are and share their reasoning! Despite the resistance to Sakura-scum, he doesn't get very involved in trying to read her or gathering support (Matias and kanye's play around Sakura appears a lot more genuine by comparison). While I do have doubts, I don't think his play is particularly unlikely to come from scum so far either so I'm pretty happy with my vote here.
Are you saying you somehow reverse-telegraphed your scumread on dolittle, which you first mentioned when his only post was a naked vote?
Didn't I do exactly the same thing as him, in naked voting and then reaffirming that he was a choice vote?
What do you think of mastin?
I've played with waynegg before, and I don't think it's pointless to respond to him.In post 111, Natirasha wrote:Dont worry, Beli, you've only seen the beginning of Waynegg's insane troll logic.
^TownIn post 113, Kalimar wrote:Belisarius voting to no-lynch in the RVS is a good way to avoid responsibility for his vote, which I've seen scum do in a recent game I played. In addition, I don't like that he votes waynegg for poor reasoning - it seems like on the surface scumhunting and not legitimate.
Vote: Belisarius
During RVS, well yeah. Now give the Grammy back to Ms. Swift and slowly back up...In post 103, kanyeknowsbest wrote:acknowledging that you think 2 of them may be town implies a reasonless vote is something that both town and scum can do.In post 99, Sakura Hana wrote:I just went and ISO'd you to find your questionMy vote wasn't 100% random, i think at least 1 of you 3 is scum so i went ahead and picked one at random.In post 45, Matias wrote:Then how is a random vote any better?
Added to my sig list!In post 111, Natirasha wrote:Dont worry, Beli, you've only seen the beginning of Waynegg's insane troll logic.
Its funny.
1) I said "at least"In post 103, kanyeknowsbest wrote:why do you think at least 1 out of 3 of the people doing a reasonless vote are scum?
A two for one trade sounds good. This feels really goodIn post 121, Matias wrote:EBWOP:
There's nothing else to say right now other than "one of these three are scum so I'll vote one of these three"?
That was a question
Wouldn't you expect that if that sort of action were null?In post 118, Sakura Hana wrote:1) I said "at least"In post 103, kanyeknowsbest wrote:why do you think at least 1 out of 3 of the people doing a reasonless vote are scum?
2) I've seen 3 people drop votes on me in a rapid manner in RVS in another game and 1 of them was scum.