Open Role 5: Switch Mafia. Over. - before 384

Yosarian2 · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:18 pm

Romanus has been prodded.

Looking for a replacement for Cameron now.

IH · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:47 am

Things that have happened. (In response to Spectrum Void)+

We've had two deaths.

A townie and a Serial Killer.

Before the crash, I believe we were discussing bandwagons. Cornflux seemed afraid to be associated with one.

Relyte had all but insulted our intelligence, and I had said so in a suspicious way.

The old vote count, pre cornflux suspicion I believe.

3 Relyte: (IH, cardboardbox, romanus)
3 IH: (ShadowLurker, SV, klebian)
1 klebian (Relyte)
Not voting: Brutal Assassin, conflux, Cameron

With 10 alive, it is 6 votes to lynch.

Oh, and what's wrong with being distant from the bandwagon since the person we lynched wasn't scum? (I'm assuming you meant distant from the day 1 wagon, I can't remember if we were having another one.)

It's the idea. You don't want to be anywhere around it, and are skittish from blame.

Even though you had games mixed up.

Cornflux Said

Do you think bandwagons are good for the town? Discussion was started already, so don't you get that apology.

What did that last part mean?

Spectrumvoid said

Well, bandwagons generally aren't good for town

How so SV?

We need some more out of Brutal Assassin

Cardboardbox gave us a decent summary of pre crash.

hey Relyte.

The FOS of the day goes to: IH

Do I get that for having three votes on me, or what?

Hey Kelbian

4. I see that you added "of course that's not bad in itself", but seriously. There's a reason for FOSes. Someone in this game is utilizing that.

But thats all Relyte uses. Why? Afraid of being associated with voting someone?

COME ON PEOPLE, this game is dying!

Yosarian2 · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:22 am

Lowell replaces Cameron.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:30 am

VOTE COUNT

3 IH (Shadowlurker, SV, klebian)
2 Relyte (IH, klebian)
1 klebian (relyte)
1 Lowell (cardb0ardb0x)

Let's get the posting back up, or I might have to put up a deadline already.

Relyte · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:06 am

IH learn the point of a FoS.

It's to show that you find someone slightly scummy, not to not vote someone.

But since you think I'm not voting you because I'm scared if you turn up town, I'll be suspicious; I'll be willing to prove you otherwise.

Vote: IH

Now you're at 2 more for a lynch.

We may want to consider claims.

IH · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:31 am

yes, but I'm not sure I've seen a vote from you this whole game, even before the crash. It looks as if you don't want to have suspicion thrown on you.

Besides, FoS's don't exactly have the same OOMPH as votes.

FoS's seem like "I'm watching you."
Votes are more "I'm after you."

Relyte · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:22 am

Relyte wrote:
Vote Klebian

for eh... being in another game of mine.

Keep in mind this thread is only about 2 pages long or so. (Counting after random votes and the Mods rules, VCs, etc.)

IH · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:27 am

even before the crash

klebian · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:30 am

what is that quote supposed to mean? He DID vote before the crash....

IH · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:31 am

Keep in mind this thread is only about 2 pages long or so. (Counting after random votes and the Mods rules, VCs, etc.)

even before the crash

better?

Relyte · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 11:35 am

IH wrote:
even before the crash

We lost

at most

1 page with the crash. I think it was a LOT less though.

IH · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 11:58 am

no way, we were on page 3 or 4 weren't we? We got sent all the way back to like three posts into page 1!

conflux · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:04 pm

Seems like I can post again.

What did that last part mean?

It meant, that you wouldn't say "making discussion" your excuse for voting me for unbandwagoning.

IH · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:08 pm

Whose question was that Conflux.

And I coulda sworn your name had an R in it.

Relyte · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:49 pm

IH wrote:Whose question was that Conflux.

And I coulda sworn your name had an R in it.

Your own.

Maybe we had 3 or 4. Whatever. Doesn't really matter IMHO. If we can't even remember what we were voting you for.

ShadowLurker · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:11 pm

Sounds like a good oppurtunity to create a false dilemna at the moment.

IH · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:45 pm

Ok, Relyte. I'm very glad you bring this up.

IH

yes, but I'm not sure I've seen a vote from you this whole game, even before the crash. It looks as if you don't want to have suspicion thrown on you.

Besides, FoS's don't exactly have the same OOMPH as votes.

FoS's seem like "I'm watching you."
Votes are more "I'm after you."

Relyte-

Keep in mind this thread is only about 2 pages long or so. (Counting after random votes and the Mods rules, VCs, etc.)

(Random vote)

IH-

Quote:
Keep in mind this thread is only about 2 pages long or so. (Counting after random votes and the Mods rules, VCs, etc.)

Quote:
even before the crash

better?

Relyte-

IH wrote:
Quote:
even before the crash

We lost at most 1 page with the crash. I think it was a LOT less though.

IH-

no way, we were on page 3 or 4 weren't we? We got sent all the way back to like three posts into page 1!

Relyte-

Maybe we had 3 or 4. Whatever. Doesn't really matter IMHO. If we can't even remember what we were voting you for.

Alright.

I brought up the point of Relyte's FoS's.

Relyte says "alright then" and votes me, after saying I need to learn the point of Fos's

I say why I think FoS's and Votes are different.

Relyte switches his defense to the threads only 2 pages long.

I reply with I was including before the crash

Relyte continues to claim that the thread wasn't that long before the crash anyway

I bring up I thought it was at least 3 or 4 pages long

Relyte says maybe it coulda been, and tries to play it off as if it doesn't matter, and switches it to being "I don't even remember why we're voting you" hoping to placate me I would assume.

The whole reason of that little banter wasn't because of why I was being voted.
It was why you don't seem to want to vote...

Also a slight Kelbian defense of Relyte has been noted, as he defends that Relyte HAS VOTED.

A random vote anyways.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:45 am

I'm finally back after a horribly long absence. I was having some weird problems on MS.net logging in and posting (I was posting from the future), read the 2 threads devoted to my problems in the help forum for details. Thanks to those who have alerted people to my problems. I'll respond to everything tomorrow.

Relyte · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:25 am

Okay, IH.

How does the thread length effect the game?

At least I'm willing to admit what I did to get votes on me.

If we had an extra 2 pages, great. It's not like there was super important information on who was scum in those pages.

I believe all we talked about it is how it was bad it was for me to make my scummy statement and yours.

The length does not change who the scum is.

Maybe we did have 3 or 4 pages in length.

I don't really care. It can't be fixed now. You shouldn't use the crash as evidence against someone, because it's not as if the crash held game-winning evidence in it.

...and please don't misinterpret me. All I'm saying is, why are you so eager to bring back the pre-crash thread, when you won't even tell us the scummy thing you did.

Now don't misinterpret you again, I am not trying to incriminate you. I'm just wondering what it is you did, because honestly, if I can remember what I did and tell everyone what it was, you can too.

IH · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:29 am

Unfortunately Relyte, if we're talking about how many FOS's you did instead of votes, then the thread length does matter. Alas, we cannot get this information back.

I'll also

unvote Vote:Lowell

until I hear something from him.

Relyte · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:37 am

IH wrote:Unfortunately Relyte, if we're talking about how many FOS's you did instead of votes, then the thread length does matter. Alas, we cannot get this information back.

I'll also
unvote Vote:Lowell
until I hear something from him.

How does a FOS make me suspicious? I'm only showing who I think to be suspicious.

However, if you think I'm trying to say, "I'm not scum because I didn't vote so-and-so, I only FOS'd him." You're wrong, I could easily use WIFOM, to say that.

Anyway, all I'm asking is can you please recall what you said that's scummy.

Maybe you're avoiding it, maybe you're not, I'm not trying to use it to incriminate you, I'm just wondering what it is... and you seem to just keep avoiding it.

IH · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:19 am

I think it was because after that bandwagon thing, I said something along the lines of "Maybe you really did mean it" or something, and that we shouldn't jump on so quick for the statement, but I either voted you or FoSed you one or the other.

Also I do not mean that FoS's are suspicious, I just personally think it's strange to use

only FoS's

. I myself only use them if we're in a Lynch or Lose situation, or if I feel strong with my vote and don't want to change it.

Also I think I know where I'm getting this excess of FoS's from you, because you are in a few other games with me, and I was getting all those FoS's mixed together in my head I think...

Relyte · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 7:08 am

IH wrote:Also I do not mean that FoS's are suspicious, I just personally think it's strange to use
only FoS's
. I myself only use them if we're in a Lynch or Lose situation, or if I feel strong with my vote and don't want to change it.

People have different playing styles.

Plus, I have vote at least twice in the course of this game. I believe I also voted for you in the stuff that was lost in the crash. I'm not sure, but I believe I said it was suspicious that you were trying to put the blame on someone as soon as they came up.

Lowell · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Mon Nov 06, 2006 2:49 am

I'm here, replacing Cameron. Sorry, I'm trying to catch up on many games at once. Yell if you need me...

Romanus · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Mon Nov 06, 2006 4:05 am

I have not read yet, I had totally forgotten that I was in this game, and for that I give my extreme apologies. I will give a read immediately and post something of consequence.