Micro 352 - Chosen Mafia Game Over

Scarab · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:51 pm

I don't even need to explain how any of that is bullshit. It speaks completely for itself.

Unvote: whoeverthefuck

Vote: idk

Melmond · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:08 pm

Votecount 2.2

Scarab - 3 (Salamence20, idk, Porkens)
OkaPoka - 1 (Lia)
idk - 1 (Scarab)

Not voting (OkaPoka, NicCage)

With 7 alive it takes 4 to lynch.

Deadline for Day 2 is July 9th at 7am.

idk · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2014 8:51 pm

lolololololol

You'll have to do some explaining for me Scarab, I'm not seeing it.

Scarab · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2014 9:06 pm

I don't care if you see it

Lia · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2014 11:43 pm

In post 98, idk wrote:Scarab also kinda beat himself up over the fact that him put his scumbuddy at L-1, allowing him to be lynched, as seen here:
In post 22, Scarab wrote:All I'm going to say is that you'd better be scum if you were willing to hammer that. Keeping someone at L-1 this early is safe specifically because there's no way a townie would ever hammer it.

Yeah, this does look a bit like Scarab was apologising to his buddy for the risky vote. I found a previous game where he'd acknowledged the risk of a premature hammer, but that wasn't at quite such an early stage.

In post 98, idk wrote:He/she then also addresses the Night Kill:
In post 81, Scarab wrote:BBT kill is kinda sorta interesting. Presumably he was lynched for being the first to vote Xayzeck day 1. I guess they just left Porkens alive for WIFOM purposes.
I see no reason to do that, especially with such an obvious reason for the NK.

It was the nk spec that did concern me a bit because it was unnecessary and just draws the sort of attention to him that he was probably hoping to avoid.

Having looked around a bit I'm now ok with this lynch and as it's been more than a day since he was put at L-1 I see no reason not to go ahead.

Vote: Scarab

Salamence20 · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:11 am

Scarab confscum.

Gg

Melmond · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:22 am

Votecount 2.3

Scarab - 4 (Salamence20, idk, Porkens, Lia)
idk - 1 (Scarab)

Not voting (OkaPoka, NicCage)

With 7 alive it took 4 to lynch.

Scarab, a

Vanilla Townie

, has been lynched Day 2.

Night 2 begins now.

Deadline for Night 2 is July 2nd at 9am.

Melmond · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:37 am

Salamence20 has been killed Night 2. He was a

Vanilla Townie

.

Deadline for Day 3 is July 16th at 2pm.

With 5 alive it takes 3 to lynch.

Day 3 begins now.

NicCage · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:26 am

Lia wtf

Porkens · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:38 am

^^faaaaaake

Vote: NicCage

NicCage · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:42 am

Fuck you porkens

Why did you vote xay?

Porkens · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:59 am

IDK and LIA, what possible difference could my motivation make? Help me understand or help me lynch this thing.

OkaPoka · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:40 pm

I have to side with NicCage here, why in the world did Lia hammer with no warning???

I'll accept Porkens quickhammer because he hit scum.

But please no more madness hammers.

Porkens · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:04 pm

OKA, my above post applies to you. sorry, I thought you were dead

NicCage · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:22 pm

In post 111, Porkens wrote:IDK and LIA, what possible difference could my motivation make? Help me understand or help me lynch this thing.

It matters because if someone were to lynch their partner right away it would be pretty easy for them to ride that the rest of the game.

Porkens · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:00 pm

NicCage · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:55 pm

So how do I know you're not doing that? I could see you as scum since you're fine with the pace this game is going

Porkens · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 3:34 am

How will my explanation of why I hammered assure you that I am or am not scum?

NicCage · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 5:47 am

I'm not looking for 100% assurance, I just want information. There's a chance that your explanation could sound phony. Even if it didn't could help me get an opinion of your character, especially if I had more to compare it with than 5 pages.
Although, I guess that question doesn't really matter now since we've built up all of these important things to talk about, right?

NicCage · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:31 am

Porkens
You were somewhat suspicious of Lia before for fluff posting. Is it safe to assume that's no longer true?
Has your read on idk changed?

Porkens · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:01 am

congrats on doin stuff. I'll keep my vote on you and hope for more.

I hammered xyl or whatever his name was partly because his response to being at L-1 felt scummy, especially the random.org comment. He was distancing himself for a stance as hard as possible. That being said, I would probably have hammered anyone given the chance to hammer in my first post on page 1 in single-digit post numbers.

IDK has posted more in this game than I've ever seen him post in any other game. He was town in those, soooooo yeah I'd lynch him today.

Lia asks me to explain why her fluff posting was fluff, that's not endearing to me. I'd lynch her today.

Lia · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:58 am

In post 111, Porkens wrote:IDK and LIA, what possible difference could my motivation make? Help me understand or help me lynch this thing.

It could give us a clue to your alignment. I see you've finally replied to that now.

In post 112, OkaPoka wrote:I have to side with NicCage here, why in the world did Lia hammer with no warning???

I'll accept Porkens quickhammer because he hit scum.

But please no more madness hammers.

First, my hammer was not a quickhammer. He'd been at L-1 for over a day. Second, it wasn't entirely without warning as idk had called for a hammer. It was Scarab's responses to idk's post that convinced me there was no point in waiting any longer. As to why I hammered, it was partly due to the reasons I gave in 104 and partly because I felt like it was going to be impossible to get a wagon on anyone else while votes were stuck on Scarab.

In post 120, Porkens wrote:I hammered xyl or whatever his name was partly because his response to being at L-1 felt scummy, especially the random.org comment. He was distancing himself for a stance as hard as possible.

So why didn't you wait to give us a chance to see who his partner was? Didn't you want to risk it?

In post 120, Porkens wrote:That being said, I would probably have hammered anyone given the chance to hammer in my first post on page 1 in single-digit post numbers.

And turning it from a game of mafia into a game of Pin the Tail on the Donkey.

In post 120, Porkens wrote:Lia asks me to explain why her fluff posting was fluff, that's not endearing to me. I'd lynch her today.

Nope. I didn't ask you why my posting was fluff; I asked you why you claimed it was, which is a different thing entirely. And despite reminding you, you still haven't answered.

Scum is either Oka due to his Day 2 play, or Porkens, whose play is anti-town at best, and at worst is scum who's behaving like he thinks he can get away with anything.

Porkens · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:14 pm

Unvote; Vote: Lia

NicCage · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:32 pm

Lia, what is it that bothers you about Oka's day 2 play?
Don't you think it's unlikely that scum would hammer their own partner?

OkaPoka · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:45 pm

In my own honest opinion, I don't think scum would insta hammer their partners day 1 when it is possible that their partner was going to live.

Or Porkens is a crazy person.