Micro 374: Baby Enough Scum 8p - GAME OVER

[BBmolla]

Votecount 1.02

kabooooom - 2 - StupendousMan, Phallacy
Salamence20 - 2 - Bins, tn5421,
Phallacy - 2 - kabooooom, Doogal121,

Not Voting: DoritoPortal, Salamence20

Deadline: (expired on 2014-08-24 18:18:00)

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

[Salamence20]

No

[tn5421]

So TN, you think it was anti-town to quicklynch?

I mean, at the time (when i thought mafia could kill), do you think mafia would try to find the SK and keep him alive to endgame him and keep from making this game nightless? I think my ideas very optimal (yet unorthodox, I agree)

I wasn't aware at the time that the mafia faction didn't command a nightkill. I think that the SK is more likely to try to take out the mafia doctor first, or just the doctors in general.

I suppose quicklynching in this setup is less bad than doing so in other setups. But it is still not my first option.

[Salamence20]

But was it anti-town thinking?

[Phallacy]

The SK is the only killing faction?

Salamence - why are you worried that someone thought it was anti-town?

[Salamence20]

Well, that IS why Im being voted by TN.

[kabooooom]

Another scum post!

LOL kaboom. You signed up a few months ago. We are a hydra of two very experienced players with high win rates. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself now.

if you are saying truth, you are in trouble. because you cant have secret hydras. And if you are lying.....gotta scum!

I'm not sure why you are expecting a fully fleshed out case on Page 2 or 3,

well, if you are so sure im scum in Page-2 or 3, then i do expect a fully fleshed case.

but it's not going to happen. I'll vote where I wish, and I'll reveal my conclusions when I wish.

if everyone starts replying like this game isnt going to move forward.

You call my pressure on you "fake" but you are the one who has responded so defensively.

show me where?

Not to mention the false bravado that is very unlike you, so yeah. You're scum.

elaborate.

You say there is scum motivation. Please do explain which post, what is the motivation behind it, and why you think it comes from scum?

You ask, you get. as soon as i will catchup, i will show you.

[tn5421]

But was it anti-town thinking?

No, it's not.

UNVOTE:

[BBmolla]

Not_Mafia replaces DoritoPortal

[Salamence20]

Not_Mafia replaces DoritoPortal

I knew this game was missing something.

Anyways this is my last post til i get to my hotel, should be caught up then

[Phallacy]

Another scum post!

LOL kaboom. You signed up a few months ago. We are a hydra of two very experienced players with high win rates. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself now.

if you are saying truth, you are in trouble. because you cant have secret hydras. And if you are lying.....gotta scum!

All that is required is for the mod to know who the players are. He does.

I'm not sure why you are expecting a fully fleshed out case on Page 2 or 3,

well, if you are so sure im scum in Page-2 or 3, then i do expect a fully fleshed case.

You're not getting one. Most reads at this point are gut or based on one or two reasons. I've stated them.

but it's not going to happen. I'll vote where I wish, and I'll reveal my conclusions when I wish.

if everyone starts replying like this game isnt going to move forward.

You call my pressure on you "fake" but you are the one who has responded so defensively.

show me where?

Um.. all of your posts following mine? I mean I can quote your ISO if you like, but it is literally every single post you've made directed at me.

Not to mention the false bravado that is very unlike you, so yeah. You're scum.

elaborate.

You have acted as though you are an authority on scum hunting, when you aren't. You vote us for.... ??? and then fail to actually explain

why

you think it's fake, or

what exactly

is the scum motivation behind any of our posts. You're positive of our alignment, yet have zero reason to be. It is uncharacteristic of your town play, and a common scumtell.

You say there is scum motivation. Please do explain which post, what is the motivation behind it, and why you think it comes from scum?

You ask, you get. as soon as i will catchup, i will show you.

I look forward to this.

[Bins]

Not_Mafia replaces DoritoPortal

Oh

[Not_Mafia]

Waka waka waka waka

VOTE: Kabooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom

TN is town. I like Sala leave him alone. Kaboom is scum OMGUSing Phallacy with random buzzwords which he hasn't backed up

Why do you say I have a long way to go?

Because you are wrong. For example,

if i wouldnt have voted molla, we wouldnt be having this discussion

. We probably would be still in RVS just randomly voting each other.
Its not that i cant vote molla in RVS. Infact Rvs is the only time when you can do whatever you want to do. Whats the point of voting molla after RVS is over.

She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?

Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.

48 comes off as too strong of an 'idgaf' post.

yes. But don't you see his changing nature?
he is trying to generate discussion, get reaction and scumhunt. But when i accuse him of fake scumhunting, unable to reply he is just like he doesn't care.
that's a scum, right there!

What does this even mean?

[tn5421]

Not_Mafia: Sala already made his point and I agree with it, you didn't really need to say anything.

[Not_Mafia]

I just meant I enjoy playing with him in general, wasn't anything content related or against you

[Bins]

NM, I'm accusing you of following me. *-* you're in every game I'm in I swear.

[Bins]

The entry post was probably the towniest thing I've seen in this game so far, so I'm happy.

[Not_Mafia]

Maybe you're following me in reverse

[tn5421]

Maybe you're following me in reverse

I don't think bins is forcing people to replace out so that you can replace in.

That's a little too far to go for a senpai.

[kabooooom]

She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?

she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.

Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.

slayer's gambit?

and yes, you are right. Phallacy and stupendiousman get us out of rvs, BUT through me. if i would have just voted random player, it would have never happened. now im not saying that i knew that would happen. but because i took part in rvs, in my own way, we got out of rvs.

[Not_Mafia]

She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?

she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.

You didn't answer my questions.

Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.

slayer's gambit?

and yes, you are right. Phallacy and stupendiousman get us out of rvs, BUT through me. if i would have just voted random player, it would have never happened. now im not saying that i knew that would happen. but because i took part in rvs, in my own way, we got out of rvs.[/quote]

Slayer's gambit is when someone intentionally acts scummy to generate discussion, if you weren't doing that then all you did was get scumread, which doesn't give you any credit for getting us out of RVS, it just makes you scummy, as does your appeal for towncred because of it.

[Not_Mafia]

She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?

she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.

You didn't answer my questions.

Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.

slayer's gambit?

and yes, you are right. Phallacy and stupendiousman get us out of rvs, BUT through me. if i would have just voted random player, it would have never happened. now im not saying that i knew that would happen. but because i took part in rvs, in my own way, we got out of rvs.

Slayer's gambit is when someone intentionally acts scummy to generate discussion, if you weren't doing that then all you did was get scumread, which doesn't give you any credit for getting us out of RVS, it just makes you scummy, as does your appeal for towncred because of it.

[tn5421]

QuoteBuster is at it again.

You have to admit that 119 does make you look a bit scummy, kaboooom.

[kabooooom]

im not sure you guys are getting my point.
let me take you to where it started.
bins basically was saying that i should not vote mod and just vote player, how everyone does.
but even in rvs, there has to be enough difference to be able to accuse someone of something. just simply voting each other doesnt get the game going. there is no pressure in rvs vote, you cant accuse someone of doing rvs vote. there has to be something different in rvs too.

[Not_Mafia]

She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?

she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.

You didn't answer my questions.

Stop skating round the issue