Micro 407: Jurassic Park Mafia - Game Over

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:12 am

I think he got a scum PM based on the following sentences you quoted.

It's alignment indicative because he has tried to use that to make himself look like town, or that he has town-slipped, but I see it as a scum-slip.

PEdit - Beck, I have made that mistake before. Every time I read Scripten's questioning, it makes me want to scum-read him. Give him time to get into the game before you read him too hard.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:13 am

In post 29, Grib wrote:All I know is that non-Herbivores must die.

More votes on the fleshchewer BBT.

And for the record, I have been in a micro on this site with a scumteam and a Serial Killer.

This post is the one I really dislike Scripten.

It's like 'Well, I'm town and I'm a herbivore, so everyone else needs to die'.

Beck · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:21 am

In post 76, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 29, Grib wrote:All I know is that non-Herbivores must die.

More votes on the fleshchewer BBT.

And for the record, I have been in a micro on this site with a scumteam and a Serial Killer.

This post is the one I really dislike Scripten.

It's like 'Well, I'm town and I'm a herbivore, so everyone else needs to die'.

But it seems scum are omnivores, so if he were scum don't you think he would know a town carnivore would speak up?

I will concede bringing up the idea of scum/3rd party does concern me a little but seeing him explain how he got there calmed those concerns

Pine · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:24 am

Where do you get the notion that scum are omnivores?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:26 am

Mod has said dinosaur eating habits are not alignment indicative.

insanity018 · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:29 am

In post 24, Grib wrote:I wonder if that constitutes a townslip for you. Hm. I already had a light townread on you anyway.

The setup heavily implies three factions. Two scum and likely one 3P.

What.

In post 39, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 2, ArcAngel9 wrote:

But the war isn’t over yet…. There are other
Carnivores
&
Omnivores
&
Herbivores
are at the edge of hunger… And has been secretively violating rules of Jurassic Park. A new revolution has begun in dinosaurs to find the dinosaurs that are violating park rules…
.

Grib saw this and assumed that Herbivores must be town.

Grib is scum. Votes on Grib please.

Stole what I was going to say BBT. Though I'm not so certain that this makes Grib scum.

In post 43, Pine wrote:Got free time faster than expected

No real reads as yet, but I may pass out from all of the stupid fumes being given off from is thread. Even if the mod didn't outright state that it's not carnivores vs herbivores etc,
someone outright herpderping that they're a carnivore would've made that obvious.
Scum would have to be absolute blithering morons to advertise it otherwise

In fact...yeah. I take it back. Mild townread on Gribble for herpderping, moderate scum read on Blueblood for unreasonable pouncing

Vote: BluebloodedToffee

What are you talking about in the bolded?

This post feels mega defensive (possibly white knighting Grib?) to me.

VOTE: Pine

P-edit: To my understanding, scum are the dinosaurs which don't follow the park rules. They can be herbivores, carnivores or omnivores --> the type of dinosaur is not alignment indicative

insanity018 · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:31 am

So I'm somehow missed a page

Will be back after work.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:32 am

I want to say Insanity is town already.

Her thoughts are lining up pretty well with mine.

Scripten · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:33 am

Beck:

Could you quote the parts of my posts you are replying to, please? It makes it easier to follow the flow of conversation.

In post 71, Beck wrote:
2. That's not really true, I was commenting on things going on in the game, they just happened to be about setup, cause somebody brought the setup up.I was trying to show they were wrong. I suggest you read more carefully next time you roll scum and you play with me

What's not really true? What you're saying here says nothing to contradict what I said about your play.

In post 71, Beck wrote:
3. I'll give you a specific example. The thing I said about my role pm, you said yours was the same yet you are arguing that grib's role pm somehow contained flavor that contradicts your own supposedly town role pm and you didn't question it. That's not a town mindset thing to do imo

I argued this:

Grib's summary of the role flavor seemed reasonable. Didn't feel too alignment-indicative.

Tell me how that translates into your interpretation.

Scripten · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:41 am

BBT:

Which of Grib's posts implied that he was trying to pass himself off as having made a townslip? He said that Beck might have made a townslip, and, of course, he didn't like you saying he'd made a scumslip, but I'm not seeing him passing off something as his own townslip. I think you're getting too excited on what is a null tell, but I'm to listening.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:43 am

OK, well I don't think I can explain it any better than I have already tried.

Scripten · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:46 am

Eh, alright. I'll try ISOing him and see if I missed anything.

Beck · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:56 am

So now you are being dense on purpose, got it. Fine when I get to a computer I'll quote the posts I'm responding to, though iys quite obvious which ones I'm responding to.

Scripten · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:04 am

In post 87, Beck wrote:So now you are being dense on purpose, got it. Fine when I get to a computer I'll quote the posts I'm responding to, though iys quite obvious which ones I'm responding to.

I still answered you. I just asked you, politely, to quote your posts in the future so the conversation is easy to follow. No need to resort to insults.

Beck · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:16 am

I didn't insult you.

FinnLaw · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:17 am

In post 76, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 29, Grib wrote:All I know is that non-Herbivores must die.

More votes on the fleshchewer BBT.

And for the record, I have been in a micro on this site with a scumteam and a Serial Killer.

This post is the one I really dislike Scripten.

It's like 'Well, I'm town and I'm a herbivore, so everyone else needs to die'.

Yeah I don't really see this as an issue for me. Can you explain further why you didn't like that?

Beck · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:18 am

In post 83, Scripten wrote:What's not really true? What you're saying here says nothing to contradict what I said about your play.

It actually does though, you tried yo imy like I was avoiding talking about the game by instead talking about setups. Thats obviously not true. I would even call it a outright lie.

FinnLaw · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:19 am

Never mind Blueblood, the answers in your previous post. Missed it, my bad.

Beck · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:20 am

*You tried to imply that I was avoiding talking about the game*

Scripten · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:26 am

In post 91, Beck wrote:
In post 83, Scripten wrote:What's not really true? What you're saying here says nothing to contradict what I said about your play.

It actually does though, you tried yo imy like I was avoiding talking about the game by instead talking about setups. Thats obviously not true. I would even call it a outright lie.

You took my vote for WAY more than it initially was, then. I said, when I voted you:

Also, gimme some idea of where you stand on a few other players rather than just the game setup, please?

Up to that point, you had done nothing but talk game setup and make one comment about a couple of players that wasn't very committal at all. Tell me how that's a lie? The way you're reacting makes me feel like you're a lot more threatened by my vote than you should be.

Scripten · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:30 am

In post 92, FinnLaw wrote:Never mind Blueblood, the answers in your previous post. Missed it, my bad.

Are you finding Grib's posts to be alignment indicative?

FinnLaw · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:34 am

In post 95, Scripten wrote:
In post 92, FinnLaw wrote:Never mind Blueblood, the answers in your previous post. Missed it, my bad.

Are you finding Grib's posts to be alignment indicative?

No I'm null on the dietary choice as alignment indicative as it was put. For me I'm finding the whole discussion of this a distraction, it just created a little confusion. To me it did anyways.

Beck · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:37 am

In post 94, Scripten wrote:You took my vote for WAY more than it initially was, then. I said, when I voted you:

I didn't take your vote for anything, cause I'm not concerned about your vote

Scripten · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:39 am

In post 97, Beck wrote:
In post 94, Scripten wrote:You took my vote for WAY more than it initially was, then. I said, when I voted you:

I didn't take your vote for anything, cause I'm not concerned about your vote

Cool beans.

Beck · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:42 am

In post 94, Scripten wrote:Up to that point, you had done nothing but talk game setup and make one comment about a couple of players that wasn't very committal at all. Tell me how that's a lie? The way you're reacting makes me feel like you're a lot more threatened by my vote than you should be.

That's because there was nothing else to talk about at the time, it was game relevant content and I was involving myself in the conversation as it was so early in.the game and nobody else was really posting.

If you are town your expectations of early day 1 are unrealistic