In post 51, White Narcissus wrote:Actually i just realized in the description of the mechanic it says that they can raise the darkening of
one or more
people.
Why did you guys even need to bring that up?
Also you've guys spent 2 pages already discussing deadlines and pseudovotes rather than actually scumhunting, save a couple, why? (Mostly directed at Zelink and Taly)
~Sakura
Honestly, all I've said so far as that we need an initiative to find a way to get answers from people effectively without doing damage. Zel has pretty much came up with the pseuedovotes and deadline idea, and I commended him for it. I even suggested the idea that an entire week is a possible timeframe for convenience and avoiding the marker of 48 hours leading to people getting a darkness point right when the day ends.
The other thing I've said is that none of us know how the scum can affect us via darkness. Leading to my suggestion of the timeline.
I also questioned Thor/Loki to see why they would just want to quicklynch someone who hasn't done anything. Don't misrep what I've done as useless because I'm adding in what I think is necessary.
It's the way Taly did it. He repeated lots of stuff already said or pretty obvious, like he wanted to share the town spotlight with the rest of the "cool guys".
This sounds vaguely insulting. I
NEVER
did repeat anything, at least not particularly:
13 >>>
Me seeing how our darkness is calculated, and raising attention on how to go about something.
39 >>>
Me verifying a new possibility of timeframe between lynches, and introducting the thought that scum can harm us on varying levels. Thor/Loki said that scum could get us at 100% darkness at night in
26, and I thought I could add on to that idea so people will understand how differently we may be affected.
Note: I also questioned them why they wanted to just lynch notscience.
44 >>>
Somehow, Skold found my previous post to cause concern....? So I continued and told him that what I brought up was valid since scums affecting us weren't specified particularly.
You have only seen
3/4 of my posts
that actually provided something new to the conversation, and here you are - who has already RVSed someone, saying that I haven't been scum hunting and therefore I must be a harm to the town?
You already put your pseudovote on me ater your 1v1 with Zel, without seeing my response to your assumptions?
What have you provided?
Then tell me, what reads do YOU have, since you have done nothing in this game that remotely resembles scumhunting.
~Sakura
Sorry, but what are
reads?
It is quite too early to give elaborate reads, but my
town reads
are stated:
Zel, Witness Protection, Thor and Loki
Everyone else is neutral so far except for you,
WN
.
For now:
Pseudovote: White Narcissus
>>>>
As for other things,
Thor/Loki
,
63 seems noncommittal. What are you reads thus far?
87 and 88
NAOMI? Naomi!
Is this Naomi-Chan!?
SeikoXNaomi
