Open 595: Elemental Mafia (Town Wins!)

[ConManMick]

OK, you want a read? I think, flubber, you're being a tad over pedantic about me not correcting a formatting error. That's a feeble line of investigation, feels like your whole line is an OMGUS vote. My vote will stay put for now.

[farside22]

flubber is now a scum read. I don't recall him trying hard to find a purpose to keep is vote on a player (yes meta)
Still think bela is scum. non reaction and newb = scum in my book

[Bellaphant]

Hehe, now I can't respond Without looking iffy. Interesting. However, your reasons didn't seem to be based on much more than a style thing, so I wasn't sure what to make of it.

[Flubbernugget]

Fuck if I know. I just know con's wasn't being used

I...jesus christ. Have you even thought about this at all?

Here's the votes. I challenge you to argue any one of them is intended to scumhunt.

Spoiler:

First..
VOTE: choof

Woohoo! Haven't played in forever! Pretty pumped up!
VOTE: senator government yeccht

vote: farside

for not being Gary Larson

VOTE: conmanmick

Can't vote properly - scummy

VOTE: fa_q2 meta says he has to be scum.

Hi(drogen) guys.

VOTE: farside22

Hi...

VOTE: vettrock

-being first
-being yoda

VOTE: conmanmick

because I can't tell if that's an elephant in your avatar or a dinosaur

Vote: nemonic

Saying myself from your bad play.

So either you're scumreading over half the players in the game, or your argument is a joke.

I just said I don't have a case for or against those being scumhunting votes. I can argue though that con's was not indicitive of a desire to scumhunt.

Last post I'm making on the subject

[Ricastle]

It was rhetorical, fool.

[Flubbernugget]

flubber is now a scum read. I don't recall him trying hard to find a purpose to keep is vote on a player (yes meta)
Still think bela is scum. non reaction and newb = scum in my book

Also, sorry Papi. Was phone posting

@Flub, any other thoughts?

Senator's questions remind me of the one's I asked in my first newbies so he can be town for now

Other than that nope

[Flubbernugget]

OK, you want a read? I think, flubber, you're being a tad over pedantic about me not correcting a formatting error. That's a feeble line of investigation, feels like your whole line is an OMGUS vote. My vote will stay put for now.

Gimme one more scum read and ill move my vote over to plot

[Flubbernugget]

flubber is now a scum read. I don't recall him trying hard to find a purpose to keep is vote on a player (yes meta)
Still think bela is scum. non reaction and newb = scum in my book

can you explain how bella's iso is fake but con's isn't?

[Alchemist21]

VC 1.2

(2)ConManMick:

FA_Q2, Flubbernugget

(2)Plotinus:

Bellaphant, Ricastle

(1)Choof:

Plotinus

(1)Senator

Lane0168

(1)Flubbernugget:

ConManMick

(1)Vettrock:

Papi Bear

(1)Bellaphant:

farside

(1)lane0168

choof

(1)Jeanne:

Vettrock

(1)Farside:

Senator

Not Voting: Optilex, Jeane11, Spartan117, mnemonicdevice

With 16 alive it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2015-05-03 12:00:00)

Also, please welcome Wisdom as our new Backup Mod!

[ConManMick]

Hmmm. Well senator could be a heretic or xenos, but that doesn't necessarily equate to scum. I'll inform the Inquisition if I think we're at risk, but for now I'll monitor it myself.
I don't think there's anything I can point out / see that hasn't been said already; Jeanne's comment could've been a joke, could've been a joke to shift attention. I see a couple of people seem to think something of plot because he changed his vote. I questioned it myself, but I'm pretty satisfied with his answer. Of course, I would've preferred an explanation at the time of the vote, but it was still an RVS vote.

[Senator]

Actually I'm trying to play some Space Hulk over here

Farside has a scumread on the person I scumread.
VOTE: unvote
VOTE: Flubbernugget

@senator without discussing theory too much this site takes voting as a very strong protrayal of one's intentions. The fact that conman didn't even ask the mod if his vote counted suggests his vote was not being used to scumhunt

What about choof not even bothering to vote? See, I think you're taking his RVS vote too far. Do you think scum is less likely to reRVS than town?

[FA_Q2]

Papa, it was another rvs joke.me and fa played our first game together in Rome. He was scum and he hammered me in lylo. So, in a game where we play together, stats say he has 100% Chance of scum. Apparently. Jokes are less funny when you explain them!

No

I understood it when you posted it and it was even more funny after you had to explain it!

[FA_Q2]

Because I agree with you?

Stating you are willing to sheep a vote that does not even exist and also not vote really seems opportunistic. Then, couple that with:

OK, you want a read? I think, flubber, you're being a tad over pedantic about me not correcting a formatting error. That's a feeble line of investigation, feels like your whole line is an OMGUS vote. My vote will stay put for now.

Gimme one more scum read and ill move my vote over to plot

Why? Why would you move your vote over to plot if you get another vote but stay where you are at if you do not? Give me a town motivation for this that makes sense. O far the only player that looks to be scum is you…

Where is flubber at in the VC? His wagon is moving awfully fast...

UNVOTE:

[ConManMick]

Aha, a Sanguine Son! So it's rivalry, not heresy. Carry on Blood Angel!

[FA_Q2]

Nevermind - VC is right above my post.

VOTE: flubber

[farside22]

flubber is now a scum read. I don't recall him trying hard to find a purpose to keep is vote on a player (yes meta)
Still think bela is scum. non reaction and newb = scum in my book

can you explain how bella's iso is fake but con's isn't?

Can you explain why con reads fake? All I've seen you mention was his vote so far.
But I'll review con when I get home and see if I see anything there.

At faq: please explain wagon going fast on Flubber to voting him for what I read as I reason.

[farside22]

Meh reread conman to see and I see a bit fake ness to his post. Seems wordy without needing to be wordy in some cases.

[FA_Q2]

“as I reason?”

I do not understand what you are exactly asking. I assume it is about my vote.

I did not vote in my first one because I thought more people had voted flubber and wanted to know where he was before placing my vote. I realized after I posted that the VC was right there and there was only one vote added after. I was mistaken when I thought he had a fast developing wagon – there just seems to be some interest there.

[ConManMick]

Sorry if it's unnecessarily flourished, coming into exam season, trying to maintain a suitable register for essays and such. Also, I've been checking this while taking breaks from an essay on Thomas Hardy

[lane0168]

It wasn't 'probably' a joke, it was

obviously

a joke and you know it. Why so eager to switch over nothing?

Also it would be totally ironic if he was telling the truth.

This seems off. Like you're trying to somewhat justify an awful votepark.

Your vote Ishould be ZERO percent serious. It's literally no better than a random vote.

Senator, nobody other than Flubber has given Mick (serious) flak for that, so...?

The only possible way to know it was obviously a joke is to know choofs alignment. Why so eager to defend choof?

The only possible way you can say his vote should be 0% serious is to know choofs alignment.

You asked plot Why he changed his vote. He answered you. You asked him again. He answered again. You asked him for a third time and yet again, he answers for a third time. Why are you not reading the answers to these questions?

Crazy eager to defend choof. Not reading answers to your own questions. I don't like that one bit

UNVOTE:
VOTE: ricastle

[choof]

Because I agree with you?

literally impossible to make a better post than this

[choof]

brb reading thread

[choof]

I just said I don't have a case for or against those being scumhunting votes.

here, let me help: the votes that were quoted were all rvs votes
having said that

I can argue though that con's was not indicitive of a desire to scumhunt.

I'm quite certain that none of the votes made on page were not "indicative of a desire to scumhunt"

Last post I'm making on the subject

and why is that?

[choof]

The only possible way to know it was obviously a joke is to know choofs alignment. Why so eager to defend choof?

The only possible way you can say his vote should be 0% serious is to know choofs alignment.

since you're invested in this, do you think that ricastle and I could feasibly be partners?

[lane0168]

The only possible way to know it was obviously a joke is to know choofs alignment. Why so eager to defend choof?

The only possible way you can say his vote should be 0% serious is to know choofs alignment.

since you're invested in this, do you think that ricastle and I could feasibly be partners?

Yes I think it's feasible. But it's also possible ricastle going for the old "see I knew he'd flip town, I could tell on day one" if you were ever to get lynched. At this point I honestly can't tell. He seemed to be budding up right away about me with you, and then his aggresive defense of you... not enough information to try to guess how it relates to your alignment yet