Open 598: GAME OVER


User avatar
You Got Schooled
You Got Schooled
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
You Got Schooled
Goon
Goon
Posts: 420
Joined: May 13, 2015

Post Post #650 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:24 am

Post by You Got Schooled »

Also, can we look at the early vcs? It might be nothing, but...

Pers has 3 votes.

It's the first wagon to get to 3.

By the next VC, the votes have disappeared onto newbie/gc.

The only other counter wagon that gets going is sthar, , in opposition to newbie, which doesn't mean as much.

Also, look at the first votes on pers: newbie, bbm and GC. 2/3 are conf!town.

Interesting, no?

-bella
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #651 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:26 am

Post by ika »

VCA is easily manipulative just an FYI
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #652 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:44 am

Post by Persivul »

@ Green Funyuns - If you're going to pull out the same D1 charges, I'll pull out the same rebuttal.



What NKs would NOT have led you to point the finger at me again, and why?
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #653 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:46 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 650, You Got Schooled wrote:Also, can we look at the early vcs? It might be nothing, but...

Pers has 3 votes.

It's the first wagon to get to 3.

By the next VC, the votes have disappeared onto newbie/gc.

The only other counter wagon that gets going is sthar, , in opposition to newbie, which doesn't mean as much.

Also, look at the first votes on pers: newbie, bbm and GC. 2/3 are conf!town.

Interesting, no?

-bella

It's interesting that you know more about who has voted for me than I do.

It seems almost as if you and funyuns had this attack all planned out.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #654 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:47 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Yeah, I still think your responses are bunk. As I made clear in , , , , and .

The NK analysis is all Anti.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #655 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:47 am

Post by Green Crayons »

The notion that YGS & I are scum buddies

is as laughable as the notion that YGS & Persiv are scum buddies
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #656 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:49 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 633, ika wrote:anti, its obvious its YGS/GC

lets just lyncht hem andbe done with it

In post 653, Persivul wrote:It seems almost as if you and funyuns had this attack all planned out.

are you two

being this obvious on purpose

???
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #657 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:50 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 654, Green Crayons wrote:Yeah, I still think your responses are bunk. As I made clear in , , , , and .

The NK analysis is all Anti.

Anti posted an opinion, not an analysis. I get that he's highly regarded here and you're likely to just follow him, but don't pretend it's on the basis of posted analysis.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #658 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:51 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I don't even know what you're saying.

I'm voting you based off of D1 case.

Anti talked about NK.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
You Got Schooled
You Got Schooled
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
You Got Schooled
Goon
Goon
Posts: 420
Joined: May 13, 2015

Post Post #659 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 9:52 am

Post by You Got Schooled »

...pers, meta me. I love this VCA nonsense. This is pure!town-bella, sorry.

Also, did you not read the game overnight?
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #660 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 10:37 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 659, You Got Schooled wrote:...pers, meta me.

Why - don't you mix it up just so that people can't reliably read you?
I love this VCA nonsense. This is pure!town-bella, sorry.

VCA?
Also, did you not read the game overnight?

Yes, but not too closely, as I didn't see the purpose in formulating a plan before the night flip. Also, I get the feeling that Anti can likely push what he wants through for another day, and a newbie isn't going to have much say.
User avatar
snscompt1
snscompt1
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
snscompt1
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2691
Joined: April 9, 2014

Post Post #661 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 10:42 am

Post by snscompt1 »

VOTECOUNT 2.01
You Got Schooled(2):
Antihero, ika
Persivul(2):
Green Crayons, You Got Schooled


Not Voting:
ZZZX, Persivul, sthar8, lane0168

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch


Deadline is June 08. 02:40 PM EST

(expired on 2015-06-08 14:40:00)
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #662 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:09 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 658, Green Crayons wrote:I don't even know what you're saying.

I'm voting you based off of D1 case.

Yeah, because D1 cases are so highly reliable.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #663 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:09 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 660, Persivul wrote:Also, I get the feeling that Anti can likely push what he wants through for another day, and a newbie isn't going to have much say.

What do you mean by this?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #664 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:11 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 663, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 660, Persivul wrote:Also, I get the feeling that Anti can likely push what he wants through for another day, and a newbie isn't going to have much say.

What do you mean by this?

It seems pretty clear to me. What part of it don't you understand?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #665 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:14 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Well

You seem to be attacking Anti for pushing you

Even though he isn't voting you

And Newbie wanted to lynch you

So it's not like Newbie not having much of a say doesn't mean much when it comes to you
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #666 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

So I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #667 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:23 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 666, Green Crayons wrote:So I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

That is totally apparent.

You need to consider context of a remark. In this case, I was replying to a question: "Also, did you not read the game overnight?"

And I replied: "Yes, but not too closely, as I didn't see the purpose in formulating a plan before the night flip. Also, I get the feeling that Anti can likely push what he wants through for another day, and a newbie isn't going to have much say."

When you read it in context, it's obvious point is that I didn't study the thread and formulate reads for two reasons: my reads might change based on the flip, and my input probably isn't going to matter for much anyway.

It has nothing to do with Anti pushing me on D1, and nothing to do with Newbie (capital N). The newbie I referred to was myself.

Slow down when you read my posts.
User avatar
lane0168
lane0168
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
lane0168
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6285
Joined: March 7, 2011
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #668 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:47 am

Post by lane0168 »

VOTE: persivul
or sthar8. Or ika
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #669 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 12:32 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Ah, okay. I was reading it in juxtaposition to our convo.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
sthar8
sthar8
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sthar8
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2462
Joined: April 29, 2008
Location: Eastern Washington

Post Post #670 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 8:33 pm

Post by sthar8 »

prodge. it's late, I'll be in tomorrow.
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #671 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:57 pm

Post by Persivul »

@ anti, ika: why did you let D1 devolve into a quick lynch:
- without giving Newbie opportunity for claim or other defense, and
- when night visiting strategy was still being discussed but hadn't been settled. Particularly anti - you seemed to think the strategy was pretty important at one point.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #672 (ISO) » Tue May 26, 2015 2:38 am

Post by ika »

In post 671, Persivul wrote:@ anti, ika: why did you let D1 devolve into a quick lynch:
- without giving Newbie opportunity for claim or other defense, and
- when night visiting strategy was still being discussed but hadn't been settled. Particularly anti - you seemed to think the strategy was pretty important at one point.


he was either scum or VT
User avatar
ZZZX
ZZZX
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
ZZZX
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10778
Joined: July 7, 2013

Post Post #673 (ISO) » Tue May 26, 2015 7:57 am

Post by ZZZX »

Sorry I forgot this started, Will check it out later as I have some paper work tomorrow.
Implosion: I see ZZZX was
redacted
. For shame, people. For shame.
The Bulge: ZZZX is ZZZX
Get to know a ZZZX: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=58733
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #674 (ISO) » Tue May 26, 2015 7:59 am

Post by Persivul »

@grand cayman (or anyone else who wants to answer): Who are/were the best players in this game in your opinion? What skills make them good?

Return to “Completed Open Games”