Mafiascum.net

Dear Diary,
Today I met someone just as much of a dirtbag as me

In post 25, Majiffy wrote:Dear Diary,
Today I met someone just as much of a dirtbag as me

Someone's alt game is on point today.

In post 27, Majiffy wrote:Someone's alt game is on point today.

Listen if we keep meeting up like this, people are going to talk.

In post 29, Majiffy wrote:Listen if we keep meeting up like this, people are going to talk.

So, erhm.... Who's gonna win the Democratic nomination?

As much as it shouldn't be so clear I think it is very clear Clinton will get it

Our justice system is playing favorites; Clinton should be indicted imho.

oh, really??

I agree

Indictment is based on evidence. It sounds very improbable to me that there isn't enough evidence to draw up formal charges against Clinton.

While the media always exaggerates things, there must be SOME evidence suggesting that Clinton MAY be guilty.

In post 34, Ircher wrote:Our justice system is playing favorites; Clinton should be indicted imho.

There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

Which, that shouldn't be the case. Not indicting Clinton imo violates this principle that our government was founded on. That's why impeachment exists.

In post 40, drmyshottyizsik wrote:There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

that's not true

In post 42, Psyche wrote:

In post 40, drmyshottyizsik wrote:There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

that's not true

You're telling me its 100% the media then?

In post 42, Psyche wrote:

In post 40, drmyshottyizsik wrote:There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

that's not true

you're right she just made it a point to announce that she isn't required to indict her even if the fbi says she should

she did not "make it a point to announce" anything

Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, asked whether her agency would be "required" to pursue criminal charges against Clinton, and she responded accurately to that question

keep the distortions coming

She should be imo. Again, going back to Rule of Law; justice should be served objectively, not subjectively. Unfortunately, justice has seemed to become intertwined with politics now, so.... broken system.....

Pedit: So you DO agree she should probably be indicted?

In post 45, Psyche wrote:she did not "make it a point to announce" anything

Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, asked whether her agency would be "required" to pursue criminal charges against Clinton, and she responded accurately to that question

Of course that's hiw she answered it, but if she were willing to indict her she would have said so, and wouldn't continuously not answer the question when asked of whether or not she would be willing to regardless

Does anyone know why the Trump page is locked?