Page 14 of 15

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2016 3:33 pm
by Haschel Cedricson
A completely new game or the continuation of this one?

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 8:06 am
by Ircher
Depends on what you guys want.

Would still need a co-mod though cuz I'd rather not do it all by myself.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:33 pm
by Haschel Cedricson
Well, I would say to continue this one because otherwise the new one will start with a bunch of procedural stuff and it'd be better to get all of that out of the way.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 2:46 pm
by Ircher
Well, I've been busy lately.

This game is currently low prio, esp. without a co-mod.

Sincere apologies.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 5:52 pm
by heuristically_alone
I like the idea of how it was turning into a clue like game of finding and killing Hitler. I could probably be co mod. But not this week as I got too much going on

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:18 am
by Ircher
Aronis already offered; I need to inform Xof or Cuddly.

Anyone is free to join, but it may be a (long) while before I update.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:01 am
by Mizzytastic
Well consider me /in, just waiting for it to be updated before I do anything.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 5:34 am
by Racer64
I'm /in, been looking for a good game of Nomic for quite some time.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:05 am
by Ircher
Ok, gonna try to update this now.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:12 am
by Ircher
In post 296, Haschel Cedricson wrote:
Proposal 347: Replace all instances of the word "Dinero" in the ruleset with the word "Haschelbux".


VOTE: Yea on 347

And I believe that according to Rule 333 everyone else is inactive right now and therefore is considered to be abstaining, so this automatically passes.
In post 297, Haschel Cedricson wrote:
Proposal 348: Transmute Rule 347 to an immutable rule.


VOTE: Yea on 348

Hey look at that.
Nice try!

Unfortunately, I already preplanned for this stuff in the original ruleset:

See immutable rule 102 which is summarized as follows:

1. The game begins when 3 players, including the mod, join.
2. If for any reason, there are less than 3 votes, then a proposal cannot be voted upon until there are 3 votes agains.

So, the mass abstain does not work here as a redult of #2.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:34 am
by Ircher
As an fyi:

1) I completely rejected 348 meaning that Hascel could make 350 but not B01
2) Any proposals, since they weren't officially reconciled in any manner, will use the new, updated thresholds when I figure them out.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:41 am
by Cheery Dog
Didn't both 347 & 348 both pass when I posted and lost my inactivity modifier?
There's nothing in rule 102 that says three votes need cast, only that they exist.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:42 am
by Cheery Dog
And if you're rulelawyering it, neither of them could be made in the first place.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:52 am
by Ircher
VOTE: Nay 347
VOTE: Yea 349 --> Passes
VOTE: Yea 350
VOTE: Abstain 351

I am "bending" the rules a bit for a couple of reasons: 1) Resolving things in an exact time frame is a bit unrealistic & unfair. 2) The mod/co-mod had never at any point formally acknowledged the law. This goes along with let's just say 101 except a bit further 3) We kinda had a mass inactivity at that point, so exceptions.

I guess in a way, I'm being unfair, but for the most part, some of the proposals, like 347 only need one more vote to pass at the current thresholds.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:53 am
by Ircher
I also bent the rules by not listing Aronis as abstaining since Aronis posted at least one while I was gone.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:53 am
by Ircher
Anyway, the third post is updated.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:59 am
by Cheery Dog
Oh OK, that ruling is okay. I think 347 should already have passed, but 348 was still made beforehand.
Definitively sure the three below it should have all passed with the inactive spell though.

VOTE: yea 347

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:06 pm
by Racer64
VOTE: YEA 337
VOTE: YEA 340
VOTE: NAY 344 On grounds that I believe it should be 2 proposals
VOTE: NAY 347
VOTE: YEA 349
VOTE: YEA 350
VOTE: NAY 351

(Edited for formatting consistency.)

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:13 pm
by Racer64
Proposal 352:
A player shall be elected judge each week by plurality vote (defer to rule 353 if it passes) to declare rule infractions.
Proposal 353:
If the winner of the plurality vote is the same as the President, the player with the second most votes will become judge. Therefore, the President may never simultaneously be the judge.

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:58 pm
by Ircher
Yeah, ok, srry everyone, but I lost interest in this thread.

If someone else wants to continue this, feel free to, but I am no longer interested in updating this.

My sincere apologies.

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:37 pm
by Aronis
If ppl still want 2 play, I can update this tomorrow

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 4:16 am
by Ircher
Oh, and @Aronis
You may pm the Mish Mash list mods if you wish to assume new ownership (but you already have modding powers, so it doesn't matter)

Peace out

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:10 am
by Aronis
Okay, so update time!

Proposal 352 is currently 1 vote short of passing
Proposal 353 is currently 1 vote short of passing

Proposal 337 is passed - (Cheery, Ircher, Heur, Aronis, Racer64) will receive 1 haschelbux
Proposal 340 is passed - (Aronis, Cheery, Heur, Ircher, Racer64) will receive 1 haschelbux
Proposal 344 is passed - (Ircher, Kappy, Heur, D3f3nd3r) will receive 1 haschelbux

Proposal 347 is passed - (Hascel, D3f3nd3r, Real, Aronis, Heur, Cheery) will receive 1 haschelbux
Proposal 349 is passed - (Heur, Hascel, Real, Cheery, D3f3nd3r, Ircher, Racer64) will receive 1 haschelbux
Proposal 350 is passed - (Hascel, Heur, Real, D3f3nd3r, Ircher, Racer64) will receive 1 haschelbux

Proposal 351 is rejected

Presidential vote #1 is over. Xalxe is declared the winner. He needs to appoint a vice president.

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:12 am
by Racer64
Is there a pronunciation guide for haschelbux? :D

Also, what's the current vote count requirement?

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:16 am
by Racer64
Nevermind, I found the vote thresholds. I need to get used to forums.