Mafiascum.net

In post 323, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 318, drmyshottyizsik wrote:

In post 314, SleepyKrew wrote:A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.

oh I'm sorry I thought you stepped down as title fairy

Just because I stepped down doesn't mean I can't discuss a nomination and why I like it or think it's terrible.

but you think I'm terrible. it's not that you want me having that title it is that you don't want me having any title

can you guys not argue about an inherently terrible title?

Like, no offense to you Aris, but the title in itself is conveying the process that Shotty is atypically someone who would be considered bad. Antithesis in itself has a bad connotation, too.

But yeah, arguing about it and being mean to each other is not the greatest idea. please stop. it's annoying

also *shotty hugs everyone*

im allergic to hugs you monster

No offense taken. But is this not a discussion area? I am merely discussing it KTS.

I read the nomination as
I don't know if that's better

In post 327, drmyshottyizsik wrote:also *shotty hugs everyone*

*Hugs Shotty back*
Someone has to!

In post 328, Nahdia wrote:im allergic to hugs you monster

better find some hugenephorin

In post 329, Aristophanes wrote:No offense taken. But is this not a discussion area? I am merely discussing it KTS.

and others are being mean in the argument regarding the title. that shouldn't be appropriate

In post 330, Cheery Dog wrote:I read the nomination as

The Site's Arthritis

I don't know if that's better

Well, that would then make him a joint in need of proper lubrication in order to work with the rest of the body [of people] so it still kinda makes sense. Lol

In post 325, drmyshottyizsik wrote:

In post 323, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 318, drmyshottyizsik wrote:

In post 314, SleepyKrew wrote:A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.

oh I'm sorry I thought you stepped down as title fairy

Just because I stepped down doesn't mean I can't discuss a nomination and why I like it or think it's terrible.

but you think I'm terrible. it's not that you want me having that title it is that you don't want me having any title

If you get nominated for a title that isn't shit, I'll privately complain about it to a bunch of people but not say anything in the thread.

*hugs shotty*

In post 287, Kappy wrote:

Nominate Haschel Cedricson for Hitler Supporter

In post 306, drmyshottyizsik wrote:

In post 305, Aristophanes wrote:

Nominate: Shotty

for

The Site Antithesis

I'm going to leave now because I actually like this and don't want to "influence the choice".

I'll this just because you like it.

In post 324, Aristophanes wrote:

Chevre wrote:As a fledgling fairy, SleepyKrew's advice is welcomed. I'll value it.

And he's right here. I'm not going to award a title that says "you are everything which this site stands against." Titles are honors, not demerits.

*Sigh*
That's not at all what it means, nor how it is intended.

Is that not obvious? I thought it was obvious.

this is why nominations should always include an explanation and justification

In post 338, Psyche wrote:

In post 324, Aristophanes wrote:

Chevre wrote:As a fledgling fairy, SleepyKrew's advice is welcomed. I'll value it.

And he's right here. I'm not going to award a title that says "you are everything which this site stands against." Titles are honors, not demerits.

*Sigh*
That's not at all what it means, nor how it is intended.

Is that not obvious? I thought it was obvious.

this is why nominations should always include an explanation and justification

I included that in a post prior to this, but after the nom.
What's wrong with that??

In post 313, Aristophanes wrote:But I thought it was pretty legit.
Does it not embody what a great many see in him?

In post 319, Aristophanes wrote:

In post 314, SleepyKrew wrote:A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.

An antithesis is a direct opposite, not the worst.
That he is in stark contrast to most who are on this site is very noteworthy and that he remains despite it is a good thing, which is arguably title worthy.

Nominate Nahdia for "Blunt"

She's very blunt. Idk if she smokes weed but tbh it's not about that

That's stupid.

In post 341, SleepyKrew wrote:That's stupid.

In post 340, zakk wrote:Nominate Nahdia for "Blunt"

She's very blunt. Idk if she smokes weed but tbh it's not about that

Spoiler: reasons, I guess

She don't mince words bruh

nah

In post 337, Egg wrote:

In post 306, drmyshottyizsik wrote:

In post 305, Aristophanes wrote:

Nominate: Shotty

for

The Site Antithesis

I'm going to leave now because I actually like this and don't want to "influence the choice".

I'll

2nd

this just because you like it.

Even if it's somewhat mean, it's true.

In post 344, Kappy wrote:

In post 337, Egg wrote:

In post 306, drmyshottyizsik wrote:

In post 305, Aristophanes wrote:

Nominate: Shotty

for

The Site Antithesis

I'm going to leave now because I actually like this and don't want to "influence the choice".

I'll

2nd

this just because you like it.

3rd

Even if it's somewhat mean, it's true.

Although I often disagree with shotty he is still a really nice person

This is more of a title/thing that is prone to taken out of context, and other/newer players might automatically get the wrong idea of Shotty based on the title. For that reason I can't endorse it since I think titles have to be inherently neutral or positive at worst.

drmyshottyizsik -> ?

In post 347, Venmar wrote:This is more of a title/thing that is prone to taken out of context, and other/newer players might automatically get the wrong idea of Shotty based on the title. For that reason I can't endorse it since I think titles have to be inherently neutral or positive at worst.

To be fair, it wsa eith hip or button, but my title at one point was VI, so this is much better than that.