STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

Firebringer · Post Post #8550 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:34 am

nc can be top 4 of this game though.

Firebringer · Post Post #8551 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:35 am

i have developed over the course of this game a detailed "which players i like the most list"
Its quite extensive.

McMenno · Post Post #8552 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:36 am

what is it

kraskaesque · Post Post #8553 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:36 am

well nc almost rejected me at one point to ally with u but then u got bubbled...u just not meant to be together

Randomnamechange · Post Post #8554 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:39 am

In post 8276, Yume wrote:Titus - Crying Breakfast Friend
RR - Market girl
mastin2 - Chiiips?
Skybird - Lord of the Universe
MoI - Untouchable
Xkfyu - Peridotty
randomidget - Mystery Man
Firebringer - Yellow Giraffe
farside - Someone I hate

And that's it.

Am I outed?

kraskaesque · Post Post #8555 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:42 am

like it wasnt already obvious from ur "guys pls dont judge theres stuff u dont know" mantra

Titus · Post Post #8556 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:48 am

In post 8544, farside22 wrote:
In post 8543, kraskaesque wrote:oh so you only get points from disbanding and not the alliance itself?
No points for getting into an alliance.
Just when/if I disband the alliancr.

In post 8546, farside22 wrote:
In post 8545, kraskaesque wrote:ok then we're allying ^_^
Yah!!!

I need a pt to rant in.
NC has been wonderful towards my cursing.

Oh what shit.

You can ask the mod for a PT to rant in.
And you can set a disband trigger.

Titus · Post Post #8557 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:53 am

Oh and Farside

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=67827

There you go.

I was a gunsmith that lasted for several days and caught scum every day but one with the checks when working with Shiro. The latter half was me.

So with all do respect, I am damn good at this game when going and no bullshit distractions.

Firebringer · Post Post #8558 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:01 am

hey titus, hows your day?

Titus · Post Post #8559 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:02 am

Sleepy.

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #8560 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:05 am

In post 8263, TheWayItEnds wrote:
In post 8256, farside22 wrote:
In post 8255, TheWayItEnds wrote:farside what happens if you reach your win condition?
I leave the game with a 3rd party win condition flip.
what happens if you get lynched again?

farside.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #8561 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:58 am

In post 8531, Titus wrote:@magna, can y'all observe each other's hoods?

Somehow missed this earlier - do you mean can I see Yume's hoods? Or other Crystal Gem hoods?

Nope. I can chat with the other Crystal Gems as a group but not see their individual alliances.

Titus · Post Post #8562 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:44 am

Ok, that is what I thought.

I am suspicious of Xfku though. He needs to fullclaim to you, but do not fullclaim to him until we trust X.

McMenno · Post Post #8563 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:46 am

he's peridot

Titus · Post Post #8564 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:50 am

In post 8563, McMenno wrote:he's peridot

I am aware of the claim McMenno.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #8565 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:58 am

In post 8538, Not Chara wrote:i'm glad we didn't. there was no way farside was responsible for that Yume kill.

Walk me through the reasoning please? I'll reciprocate, but I'm trying to figure out why you're dismissing Farside as a suspect.

Also we should have been the one's to hammer, regardless of who it was. Anyone who doesn't realize why

really

hasn't been paying attention.

~Drixx

McMenno · Post Post #8566 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:03 am

ftr if I die my advice is lynch kraska

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #8567 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:03 am

In post 8562, Titus wrote:Ok, that is what I thought.

I am suspicious of Xfku though. He needs to fullclaim to you, but do not fullclaim to him until we trust X.

I had expected he will be full-claiming so we are on the same page.

Titus · Post Post #8568 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:11 am

In post 8565, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8538, Not Chara wrote:i'm glad we didn't. there was no way farside was responsible for that Yume kill.
Walk me through the reasoning please? I'll reciprocate, but I'm trying to figure out why you're dismissing Farside as a suspect.

Also we should have been the one's to hammer, regardless of who it was. Anyone who doesn't realize why
really
hasn't been paying attention.

~Drixx

There is absolutely no link between Farside not triggering the event and her alignment.

Why kill Yume

now

? At that particular moment, the heat was coming off Farside. Giving six additional days and resetting doesn't make sense for Farside if she has the trigger.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #8569 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:25 am

In post 8568, Titus wrote:
In post 8565, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8538, Not Chara wrote:i'm glad we didn't. there was no way farside was responsible for that Yume kill.
Walk me through the reasoning please? I'll reciprocate, but I'm trying to figure out why you're dismissing Farside as a suspect.

Also we should have been the one's to hammer, regardless of who it was. Anyone who doesn't realize why
really
hasn't been paying attention.

~Drixx
There is absolutely no link between Farside not triggering the event and her alignment.

Why kill Yume
now
? At that particular moment, the heat was coming off Farside. Giving six additional days and resetting doesn't make sense for Farside if she has the trigger.

I <3 you Titus. I really wanted to see what Not Chara would say though. Like .. really really wanted to see reasoning for that opinion from NC.

~Drixx

farside22 · Post Post #8570 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:41 am

In post 8569, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8568, Titus wrote:
In post 8565, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8538, Not Chara wrote:i'm glad we didn't. there was no way farside was responsible for that Yume kill.
Walk me through the reasoning please? I'll reciprocate, but I'm trying to figure out why you're dismissing Farside as a suspect.

Also we should have been the one's to hammer, regardless of who it was. Anyone who doesn't realize why
really
hasn't been paying attention.

~Drixx
There is absolutely no link between Farside not triggering the event and her alignment.

Why kill Yume
now
? At that particular moment, the heat was coming off Farside. Giving six additional days and resetting doesn't make sense for Farside if she has the trigger.
I <3 you Titus. I really wanted to see what Not Chara would say though. Like .. really really wanted to see reasoning for that opinion from NC.

~Drixx

There are times I feel your questions are full of fluff and some false comments seem to be your Forte currently.
Not sure why.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #8571 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:59 am

In post 8570, farside22 wrote:
In post 8569, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8568, Titus wrote:
In post 8565, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8538, Not Chara wrote:i'm glad we didn't. there was no way farside was responsible for that Yume kill.
Walk me through the reasoning please? I'll reciprocate, but I'm trying to figure out why you're dismissing Farside as a suspect.

Also we should have been the one's to hammer, regardless of who it was. Anyone who doesn't realize why
really
hasn't been paying attention.

~Drixx
There is absolutely no link between Farside not triggering the event and her alignment.

Why kill Yume
now
? At that particular moment, the heat was coming off Farside. Giving six additional days and resetting doesn't make sense for Farside if she has the trigger.
I <3 you Titus. I really wanted to see what Not Chara would say though. Like .. really really wanted to see reasoning for that opinion from NC.

~Drixx
There are times I feel your questions are full of fluff and some false comments seem to be your Forte currently.
Not sure why.

I personally think Titus is mistaken and that the pressure flowing away from you made it

precisely

the right time for a scum!you to drop a bomb like that. It keeps you alive and took the focus away from you, which you desperately needed because Titus was only going elsewhere today because she couldn't get you lynched today.

But that's really beside the point, isn't it? I wanted to know what Not Chara had for reasoning, because it's not enough for someone to just express a position with no substantiation.

And could you be any more obvious in attacking the slot you know can ensure your death? I mean... seriously. Just kill us tonight if you're that worried about it.

~Drixx

farside22 · Post Post #8572 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:10 am

In post 8571, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8570, farside22 wrote:
In post 8569, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8568, Titus wrote:
In post 8565, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 8538, Not Chara wrote:i'm glad we didn't. there was no way farside was responsible for that Yume kill.
Walk me through the reasoning please? I'll reciprocate, but I'm trying to figure out why you're dismissing Farside as a suspect.

Also we should have been the one's to hammer, regardless of who it was. Anyone who doesn't realize why
really
hasn't been paying attention.

~Drixx
There is absolutely no link between Farside not triggering the event and her alignment.

Why kill Yume
now
? At that particular moment, the heat was coming off Farside. Giving six additional days and resetting doesn't make sense for Farside if she has the trigger.
I <3 you Titus. I really wanted to see what Not Chara would say though. Like .. really really wanted to see reasoning for that opinion from NC.

~Drixx
There are times I feel your questions are full of fluff and some false comments seem to be your Forte currently.
Not sure why.
I personally think Titus is mistaken and that the pressure flowing away from you made it
precisely
the right time for a scum!you to drop a bomb like that. It keeps you alive and took the focus away from you, which you desperately needed because Titus was only going elsewhere today because she couldn't get you lynched today.

But that's really beside the point, isn't it? I wanted to know what Not Chara had for reasoning, because it's not enough for someone to just express a position with no substantiation.

And could you be any more obvious in attacking the slot you know can ensure your death? I mean... seriously. Just kill us tonight if you're that worried about it.

~Drixx

And I could have hammer voted snarky but someone said to wait

Gee do you think scum was more frigtened by my ability there.
Moi sure would be up shit Creek with a Snarky scum flip.
I wasn't remotely on the table at that point.

At what point are you going to respond to the question I asked about scum not voting beach event.
I totally love you dancing past that question.

Almost50 · Post Post #8573 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:18 am

So Yume passed away as a martyr to save the rest of us? *Sigh*
This quite changes a lot.

@MoI:

We need to agree on a 3rd for our alliance and get them to confirm they're submitting us both as well. I'll let you pick, but I don't want anyone "questionable", as it's already has been announced that I might end up with a shitload of info/analysis from RR that I would need to pass along.

Also, a reminder: Since The Cluster already went off then we no longer need to worry about not using night actions. In other words, all investigative/informative/protective Town Roles are free to perform their actions tonight.

McMenno · Post Post #8574 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:19 am

In post 8573, Almost50 wrote:So Yume passed away as a martyr to save the rest of us? *Sigh*
This quite changes a lot.

@MoI:

We need to agree on a 3rd for our alliance and get them to confirm they're submitting us both as well. I'll let you pick, but I don't want anyone "questionable", as it's already has been announced that I might end up with a shitload of info/analysis from RR that I would need to pass along.

Also, a reminder: Since The Cluster already went off then we no longer need to worry about not using night actions. In other words, all investigative/informative/protective Town Roles are free to perform their actions tonight.

this is not true, keep foregoing night actions