In post 66, nmego12345 wrote:I was trying to make people random vote* And that was directed to Aelin and malpascp who weren't very active as well.
In post 70, nmego12345 wrote:I was asking them why didn't they random vote AT THAT TIME. not now
I'm confused, please explain how the two statements together make sense. You did suggest that Aelin could now make a vote since there have been a lot of unvotes. Do you suggest she make a RVS vote, or a serious vote? I'll repeat my original question then: what is the purpose of trying to make her vote?
Do you think participating in RVS is alignment indicative (if so which way)?
In post 87, Creature wrote:Genuine towniness is easy to find, genuine scumminess is very rare.
Rare is still more often than nonexistent. If you're scum you can only find nonexistent scumminess unless you bus, which can only get you so far. Especially in a micro
You just put everyone at L-2, If anyone tried to lynch anyone, then it's pretty easy for derphammering to occur.
That's why I was suspicious of you, along with a guts feeling, why would you put everyone at L-2?
Though that doesn't make you mega scummy, It's a small Fos
So scum could have the pleasure of obviously disagreeing with me, saying how putting ppl at L-2 is oh so bad, while they think saying that makes them look super townie and careful.
And to generate discussion, yes.
How are you so sure that's what scum would do?
This sounds like you've just added unnecessary wifom to the early game.
In post 87, Creature wrote:Genuine towniness is easy to find, genuine scumminess is very rare.
Rare is still more often than nonexistent. If you're scum you can only find nonexistent scumminess unless you bus, which can only get you so far. Especially in a micro
In post 57, qubixes wrote:
Regardless of anyone acknowledging the post, what are your thoughts on it? Why do you think it should be acknowledged?
When someone doesn't have anything to say, directly interacting with them or talking about them is the best way to give them something to say
Why did you not start yourself then? "Did no one acknowledge this?" is kind of a weird starter. Do you think it is suspicious/alignment indicative or not?
You just put everyone at L-2, If anyone tried to lynch anyone, then it's pretty easy for derphammering to occur.
That's why I was suspicious of you, along with a guts feeling, why would you put everyone at L-2?
Though that doesn't make you mega scummy, It's a small Fos
So scum could have the pleasure of obviously disagreeing with me, saying how putting ppl at L-2 is oh so bad, while they think saying that makes them look super townie and careful.
And to generate discussion, yes.
How are you so sure that's what scum would do?
This sounds like you've just added unnecessary wifom to the early game.
I'm not. I do think it's worthy looking into though IMO. Saying my post was scummy seemed like an easy attempt for town cred.
In post 57, qubixes wrote:
Regardless of anyone acknowledging the post, what are your thoughts on it? Why do you think it should be acknowledged?
When someone doesn't have anything to say, directly interacting with them or talking about them is the best way to give them something to say
Why did you not start yourself then? "Did no one acknowledge this?" is kind of a weird starter. Do you think it is suspicious/alignment indicative or not?
I think lurking comes more often from weak players than scum.
It is a weird starter, but I think scum and town would react to it differently.
