Mini 1852 - Werewolves and Jester win!

Jaack · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 2:54 am

In post 62, Klingoncelt wrote: She.

I'm a "she." Always have been.

Anyway, at least I got a bit of discussion started, if this game goes any slower it'll start moving backwards.

In post 63, Klingoncelt wrote: I am wondering if Jaack's interest in my mislynch has to do with my RVS vote on him.

I bet it does.

I truly appoligze for the pronoun confusion.

That being said, I'm not feeling anymore comfortable with these responses.
While you're right that getting discussion started is a good thing, I don't necessarily see that as the intention behind your post that I took issue with. And even if that was the intention, you've done little to continue on this discussion.

I'd be lying if I said I didn't notice your RVS vote on me prior to my vote, but I would have voted if you had been voting for anyone else.

I'm not concerned one bit about an RVS vote, and the fact that you are implying that I am without responding adequately to the content of my posts looks rather scummy to me.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 2:58 am

Hai
This looks to be a useless slot
VOTE: PUPPER

Vedith · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 2:59 am

Jaack... You scum?

PEdit - How the fuck can you vote a pupper? You monster!

Jaack · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:05 am

In post 77, Vedith wrote:Jaack... You scum?

*Checking role PM*

Naaah

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:07 am

In post 77, Vedith wrote:Jaack... You scum?

PEdit - How the fuck can you vote a pupper? You monster!

Dude's p much one of those Twitter bots

drealmerz7 · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:12 am

In post 78, Jaack wrote:
In post 77, Vedith wrote:Jaack... You scum?
*Checking role PM*

Naaah

the tone of this reeks to me

fake / very not genuine

Vedith · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:13 am

In post 78, Jaack wrote:
In post 77, Vedith wrote:Jaack... You scum?
*Checking role PM*

Naaah

Phew! At least we have 2 confirmed town now.

KuroiXHF · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:14 am

I'll hold onto my vote for now.

Vedith · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:14 am

In post 79, Gamma Emerald wrote:Dude's p much one of those Twitter bots

As long as I win an iPad, I ain't even mad.

Vedith · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:15 am

In post 80, drealmerz7 wrote:fake / very not genuine

Why would he lie about his role?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:26 am

you mean alignment

and, fuck, he doesn't even know if role/alignment is True - that mod is a bastard

more appropriate response would have been "I don't know! PM says so, but, I still have my doubts!"

drealmerz7 · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:27 am

EBWOP

In post 85, drealmerz7 wrote:you mean alignment

and, fuck, he doesn't even know if role/alignment is True - that mod is a bastard

more appropriate response would have been "I don't know! PM says
not
, but, I still have my doubts!"

Vedith · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:34 am

In post 85, drealmerz7 wrote:you mean alignment

and, fuck, he doesn't even know if role/alignment is True - that mod is a bastard

more appropriate response would have been "I don't know! PM says so, but, I still have my doubts!"

Yeah I mean alignment!
I think his best response would have been "I'm scum!" because then we would have had scum on day 1 easy game easy life. But he didn't say that, so saying what his best response would be is pointless.
I know that my alignment is true. I'm town and Von would

never

lie to me!
Do you feel that you could be scum, Dreal?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:47 am

to me what is not pointless is the tonality of such a statement surrounding such a subject - it's amplified in significance, imo, because of the "awkwardness" associated with PM/role/alignment talk, that he chose to answer it is meaningful, how he answered it is also meaningful, what those meanings are is yet to be determined, my point was only to point out that it didn't sound like a genuine response, which means it COULD have been faked, that is all, it's not damning or anything bigger than that

Drone · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:01 am

So, shade throwing? :T

vonflare · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:02 am

VOTE COUNT

StrangerCoug

(3): mhsmith0, SnarkySnowman, Drone

KlingonCelt

(2): Jaack, McMenno

PUPPER

(2): AlpacaAlpaca, Gamma Emerald

KuroiXHF

(1): KlingonCelt

McMenno

(1): Vedith

No Lynch

(1): drealmerz7

Not voting

(4):
StrangerCoug
KuroiXHF
DeathByWobbuffet
PUPPER

With 14 alive it's 8 to lynch.

Day ends in (expired on 2016-11-30 00:00:00)

KuroiXHF · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:07 am

Klingon, dont hate us because you anus.

drealmerz7 · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:22 am

In post 89, Drone wrote:So, shade throwing? :T

no, putting theory of a potentiality on the table to be looked at by everyone if they think it warrants looking at, if not, they can say so, or just disregard

Vedith · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:23 am

Dreal, you scum?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:47 am

Vedith · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:08 am

Okay, so who's next for the questioning?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:20 am

the mod!

StrangerCoug · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:43 am

Right now my mind isn't telling me there's enough evidence for Jaack or Klingoncelt being scum to pursue them, so I'll treat that as a non-starter.

In post 80, drealmerz7 wrote:
In post 78, Jaack wrote:
In post 77, Vedith wrote:Jaack... You scum?
*Checking role PM*

Naaah
the tone of this reeks to me

fake / very not genuine

Could you elaborate on this and explain why you're voting no lynch instead of Jaack if you think his post is scummy?

AlpacaAlpaca · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:44 am

In post 73, PUPPER wrote:
In post 35, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:VOTE: PUPPER
Where he at though?
Arf!

*pant**pant**pant*

*licks Alpaca's hand*

*Pets PUPPER enthusiastically*

drealmerz7 · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:47 am

In post 97, StrangerCoug wrote: Could you elaborate on this and explain why you're voting no lynch instead of Jaack if you think his post is scummy?

I'm voting the mod now because I'm sure he's scum. Vote with me, let's lynch and see what we get. I'm so serious about this people, it CAN'T HURT CAN IT?!