Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 4:50 pm
KuroiXHF is being prodded.
It's such a softball question, though. Townies do it, scum do it. All the person being questioned needs to respond with is "I'm funning around" or somesuch, and that's the end of that.KuroiXHF wrote:Judging me based on others is definitely not a good idea.In post 1590, Socrates wrote:Camn did this more or less the whole game. Shadow should have seen at least some of that by now.In post 1588, KuroiXHF wrote:It' a cute intro. Leave it at that.In post 1586, Shadow_step wrote:Kuroi what exactly is the point of saying that you are not scum?
Unprovoked? We did a mass name-claim.In post 1592, KuroiXHF wrote:More reading:
- Townie points from MOI although he's quite difficult to read. His first point in 206 is odd. I haven't seen him so outraged based off poor grammar. And this is coming from me, the grammar lord himself.
- Socrates' 241 gave me a scum vibe since it was less town-motivated and more dismissive than something I'd imagine from town.
- Dunnstrall is throwing his votes on page 13 like they're candy? wtf?
- Camn's 418 is actually pretty good.
- 521 is reminding me of Spyrex's lurking, which I don't like.
- Page 22 makes me believe Dunn might be town, because he's acting believably scummy.
- 598, and unprovoked! I kind of really think you're scum!
- 603 I'm struggling if this is protecting of scum, but I'll take it.
I'll stop here, at the end of page 25.
Pisskop is also BP, so we're no-lynching to hopefully get the scum to kill one of the non-confirmeds.In post 1598, Titus wrote:I saw this page and the first post. We lynched scum day one. Pisskop is IC. Anything else I should know?
I haven't read them yet. I generally do not read unless I know what I am looking for.In post 1610, Socrates wrote:Pisskop is also BP, so we're no-lynching to hopefully get the scum to kill one of the non-confirmeds.In post 1598, Titus wrote:I saw this page and the first post. We lynched scum day one. Pisskop is IC. Anything else I should know?
We did a mass nameclaim day one because Dunnstral was looking for robots. Pisskop, Spyrex, and Camn had all claimed to be robots.
What do your neighbor threads look like?
Filler.In post 678, SpyreX wrote:I'm voting ari and i want the claims done gosh why this when I've been drinking
I don't like this. Seems to be grandstanding. However, if this is scum, it points to MoI possibly not being scum. He advises his buddies against grandstanding.In post 689, Dunnstral wrote:Wow nice list!!! 10/10
This was stupid.
Shadow, you're lucky I'll consider your actions because this would be enough for me to want to vote LDD.In post 801, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You talked with us in the Mafia QT plenty of times that game, I don't remember you being that far V/LA. I remember it being mostly Katsuki using that as an excuse to lurk.
Besides, you're the type of player who would absolutely kill Nacho last night. Your faux sentimentality is betraying your motivations.
In post 871, Socrates wrote:the fuck is this game.
...in a game of Mafia.In post 892, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Full claim or you die, Lui. I will not play games with you.
Vote: Lui
L-1
WIFOM, whether intentional or inadvertent.In post 897, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Well let’s get the important part out of the way first …
VOTE: Lil Uzi
Out of interest did this actually happen or was it you shooting the shit / gambitting?In post 1551, pisskop wrote:I have a theory I want to test tonight actually
In post 1583, KuroiXHF wrote:64 pages, eh? I won't be able to be all caught up, but I'll try to be by tomorrow.
BTW, I'm not scum.
And I'll stick to that story!
So what does it say to you that Shadow didn’t do this, that LLD didn’t want to comment on the Spyrex claimed PT and that Titus isn’t bothering either?In post 1589, Socrates wrote:Shadow, could you give us your perspective on the neighbor threads between your slot/MOI and your slot/Spyrex?
Glad to know you have no chance of dying tonight Titus.In post 1618, Titus wrote:Moi, u wanna fite me tomorrow?
Agreed. You need someone to push on. My no read stance is hardly new.In post 1619, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Glad to know you have no chance of dying tonight Titus.In post 1618, Titus wrote:Moi, u wanna fite me tomorrow?
In post 911, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So time to look for crumbs of Jae’s Night 1 investigation …
Here’s the scoop on why I hammered LUV – his claimed role I didn’t see possible in the scope of the game. See I am Bulletproof – no X shot or whatever. Full BP. So I felt that LUV claiming himself to be immune to Nightkills and able to hand out a 1-Shot BP was inordinately overkill.
So this is an important reason why lying as Town is bad which I hope LUV takes to heart.
Anyway I claimed since there is no chance I’m getting shot by scum after yesterday.
Also ...
VOTE: Camn
I'll lay out why I think this in a later post ...
This doesn't seem to be scum theater.In post 912, Socrates wrote:vote: Magna
Jae clearly breadcrumbed investigating Pisskop. He's town.
Magna's reasoning for hammer Uzi is fucking godawful. The mod refusing the confirm the presence of a third party is evidence of a third party?! That's VI logic, and he's no VI.
The only thing that gives me pause is that Uzi apparently WAS lying about being Ascetic, but I have no idea how Magna could know this other than being Ascetic himself. In which case, why the fuck didn't HE claim Ascetic day 1 if he thought that was the pro-town thing to do?
Prev-Edit: Magna, How does your BP interact with poison? I forget how that tends to work.
And your case on Camn better be fucking rock solid, because your snipes at her was as bad as she herself was saying.
LOL. WHERE? WHO SAID THAT? DS did not say that. I'm surprised only Camn said anything about this.In post 913, pisskop wrote:Ummm Im a fucking Innocent child
Asking the mod these questions aren't giving you any town points.In post 1100, SpyreX wrote:Camn you're killin me here cause its mechanically clear what happened.
@mod:
Hypothetically, if a gunsmith checked someone with the potential to kill, but not the ability currently what result would they get.