Open 661: Pick Your Poison [Game Over]

nn30 · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:52 pm

Nice avatar Gamma.

VOTE: gamma

Vedith · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:53 pm

In post 40, PenguinPower wrote:I'm not going to spoil it before TB gets back in here, but...yeah...this got carried a bit out of hand.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:54 pm

In post 50, nn30 wrote:Nice avatar Gamma.

VOTE: gamma

I like it

ThinkBig · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:55 pm

@MOD: V/LA until next Wednesday. First final exam is tomorrow. I will still be posting and will still be active during this time, but I do have a lot of work and studying to do.

PenguinPower · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:53 pm

In post 51, Vedith wrote:
In post 40, PenguinPower wrote:I'm not going to spoil it before TB gets back in here, but...yeah...this got carried a bit out of hand.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:20 pm

In post 54, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 51, Vedith wrote:
In post 40, PenguinPower wrote:I'm not going to spoil it before TB gets back in here, but...yeah...this got carried a bit out of hand.

Vedith and PP likely not teamed.

nn30 · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:29 pm

@Lickety - explain that logic please

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:37 pm

In post 56, nn30 wrote:@Lickety - explain that logic please

The joke between the two is way too over the top. There is nothing secretive about it. Also, PP made that comment without it being expected. Scum communicate a lot itt even if they aren't explicit about it. Its also incredibly silly. I don't expect that Mafia joke together that way. A lot of people might not consider this strong evidence, but I consider it all the same.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:41 pm

Looks like this is going to be another one of those games where I am constantly firing from the hip. I usually don't have good games where I do that. I'll try and limit that going forward.

Realeo · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:36 pm

In post 57, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 56, nn30 wrote:@Lickety - explain that logic please
The joke between the two is way too over the top. There is nothing secretive about it. Also, PP made that comment without it being expected. Scum communicate a lot itt even if they aren't explicit about it. Its also incredibly silly. I don't expect that Mafia joke together that way. A lot of people might not consider this strong evidence, but I consider it all the same.

This is an extreme generalization. Shoo. Shoo.

This is not about strong evidence = weak evidence = same. This is NOT an evidence.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:38 pm

I don't get how LQ can figure that type of thing from such a minor interaction. It's mainly just a reference to a previous game, I think they'd make it anyway if they were scum together.

Realeo · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:40 pm

In post 21, Gamma Emerald wrote:Vedith is rolefishing, vote him.

Isn't RVS to early to throw shade, even for a town?

Realeo · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:42 pm

Let me park my vote here.

VOTE: GE (Gamma Emerald/General Electric

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:42 pm

In post 61, Realeo wrote:
In post 21, Gamma Emerald wrote:Vedith is rolefishing, vote him.
Isn't RVS to early to throw shade, even for a town?

That's not throwing shade, that's analysis.

Realeo · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:43 pm

Considering the fact that you rebuttal LQ with meta argument, you put no meta knowledge to your analysis?

If you're first time playing with Vedith, I may give this a pass. I don't think that's the case?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:45 pm

It still feels like rolefishing, so it's an okay vote. I understand the joke but until Vedith towns up a bit I'm still considering that a bit scummy.

Realeo · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:45 pm

That's fair enough.

UNVOTE:

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:04 pm

In post 59, Realeo wrote:
In post 57, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 56, nn30 wrote:@Lickety - explain that logic please
The joke between the two is way too over the top. There is nothing secretive about it. Also, PP made that comment without it being expected. Scum communicate a lot itt even if they aren't explicit about it. Its also incredibly silly. I don't expect that Mafia joke together that way. A lot of people might not consider this strong evidence, but I consider it all the same.
This is an extreme generalization. Shoo. Shoo.

This is not about strong evidence = weak evidence = same. This is NOT an evidence.

You're not going to like my playstyle very much then, LOL.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:14 pm

In post 66, Realeo wrote:That's fair enough.

UNVOTE:

I can tell your bark is far worse than your bite.

Realeo · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:26 pm

Why are you assuming that I'm intimidating when I'm not trying to intimidate? Like who pull their intimidation gun page 3?

ThinkBig · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:35 pm

In post 69, Realeo wrote:Why are you assuming that I'm intimidating when I'm not trying to intimidate? Like who pull their intimidation gun page 3?

You said you were going to park your vote, but quickly un voted.

Realeo · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:38 pm

Oh. GM know how I roll.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:43 pm

In post 69, Realeo wrote:Why are you assuming that I'm intimidating when I'm not trying to intimidate? Like who pull their intimidation gun page 3?

Combination of the bad logic and dropping the vote.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:44 pm

In post 71, Realeo wrote:Oh. GM know how I roll.

We got ourselves a badass here.

Realeo · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:45 pm

This is the first time we play right? We will get used to each other =]