rb a chainsaw requires a scumread on you for scumreading my bud charloux over here dont mistake the term with soft defense
Also your logic was bad admit it and move on
Reflect on yourself in the heat of passion to reveal what the cold eye of logic sees not.
In post 75, Road Kamelot wrote:rb a chainsaw requires a scumread on you for scumreading my bud charloux over here dont mistake the term with soft defense
Also your logic was bad admit it and move on
this is gonna be a long game for u if ur gonna talk to me about logic
In post 70, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm not sold on scum!karnos but I don't like how his reaction in 52 was to try to peg me for some kind of hypocrisy so I'm trying to get more there if/when he answers my questions
a) I don't think 40 was proved to be inaccurate, the setup spec point doesn't matter nearly as much as your point about karnos defending himself against an accusation that hasn't happened. And everything else in 58 is exactly my problem with what karnos did. I'm on the same wavelength as you and it looks to me like you're trying to sort people. That's enough for a D1 early TR
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 70, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm not sold on scum!karnos but I don't like how his reaction in 52 was to try to peg me for some kind of hypocrisy so I'm trying to get more there if/when he answers my questions
What you did is scummy, but spelling it out rewards scum so I can't do that right now.
Hopefully other posters can put 1 and 1 together to realize you are scum.
Oh no no no, what YOU did was scummy and what I did was call you out on potential bullshit.
You clearly get my problem with your original post by now, and you conceded it was a "play error". Why are you calling me scum for saying it was a bad post? And do you have no other thoughts on anything else that's happened?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
I'm also not sure that it really was "intended" by karnos at the time, seeing as he asked me to explain to him why it was bad.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 83, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm also not sure that it really was "intended" by karnos at the time, seeing as he asked me to explain to him why it was bad.
This is scum right here. Read the post in question. Think about my motivations, and why I would say what I said. Yes, there is a reason why I'd say what I said, it should be obvious to anyone who read the game setup.
In post 84, karnos wrote:This is scum right here. Read the post in question. Think about my motivations, and why I would say what I said. Yes, there is a reason why I'd say what I said, it should be obvious to anyone who read the game setup.
WIFOM about your role on page 2 is not pro town bud, sorry. Either you made a VI move or you said something scummy and are trying to cover it up now. The fact that you're taking a hardcore binary approach of "GL calling me on this = scum" is not a good look for you
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
why do you believe this. Give me a neutral, objective answer.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
No. Answer my question. You effectively claimed VT on page 2 because you weren't thinking about what you were saying, regardless of alignment. Is that because you're scum or VI? And why would "only scum" push you on it when you say something horrendously anti-town? Why is it impossible for me to be town in your eyes?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
If you refuse to answer my question in 87, I will treat it as a literal scumclaim
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
not moving my vote unless karnos gets his head out of his ass and talks to me straight up about why I can't be town here
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
also if I have my way, that time will be coming soon when you're at L-1
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 59, Road Kamelot wrote:rb noah fence but this logic doesnt make any sense and youre missing that charlouxs initial scumread post was a blatant joke
even if youre scumreading him for his tone and responses, which is fine u do you, dont pretend this logic holds water
This also feels like she knows rb is town.
-Logic makes no sense - is that not why we scumread people? lol
-You somehow know he missed the joke and isn't scum misrepping
-Throws the biggest benefit of the doubt I've ever seen like, where did rb talk about tone at all
-Doesn't care if he keeps pushing him but doesn't think it holds water --- what
Like it feels too easy but I think it's just RK + someone who hasn't shown up yet.
in other news, now that RK has responded, I don't find this argument from culted convincing at all. I don't see a convincing reason to believe that RK "knows" rb is town versus the alternative explanation where RK is simply townreading rb.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
Anyway, I basically looked at Karnos vs. GuiltyLion. I don't have much time at the moment but what I will say is that it is GuiltyLion that looks slightly worse from the interactions.
"one of these days i'll read you correctly" - Transcend, Micro 714